4 answers2025-06-25 22:31:51
'Lost Roses' unfolds against the turbulent backdrop of World War I and the Russian Revolution, weaving together the lives of women from vastly different worlds. The story splits between New York's glittering high society and the war-torn streets of St. Petersburg, with a third thread following a peasant family fleeing the chaos. The contrast is striking—lavish ballrooms where champagne flows freely versus frozen landscapes where survival hinges on a crust of bread.
Martha Hall Kelly's research shines in the details: the rustle of silk gowns at the Astor mansion, the scent of gunpowder in Russian alleys, and the eerie silence of abandoned estates. Historical figures like Eliza Ferriday mingle with fictional characters, grounding the drama in real events. The setting isn't just scenery; it's a character itself, shaping choices and destinies with every political tremor and social divide.
4 answers2025-06-29 12:46:09
I adore historical fiction, and 'Lost Roses' by Martha Hall Kelly is a gem. You can snag it at major retailers like Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Books-A-Million—both online and in physical stores. Independent bookshops often carry it too; check local listings or platforms like Bookshop.org to support small businesses. Libraries are a great free option if you prefer borrowing. The audiobook version, narrated beautifully, is available on Audible or Libby. For collectors, signed editions might pop up on eBay or author events. The book’s popularity means it’s rarely out of stock, but prices vary by format (hardcover, paperback, e-book).
If you’re outside the U.S., international sellers like Book Depository offer free shipping. Kindle and Apple Books have instant downloads, while secondhand copies thrive on ThriftBooks or AbeBooks. I’d recommend comparing prices—sometimes Target or Walmart has surprising deals. For autographed copies, follow Martha Hall Kelly’s social media for announcements. Don’t forget used-book sales at libraries; I once found a pristine hardcover there for $5.
4 answers2025-06-29 17:14:59
'Lost Roses' follows three unforgettable women whose lives intertwine amid the chaos of World War I. Eliza Ferriday is a New York socialite with a heart for philanthropy—her journey to St. Petersburg to rescue her godmother, Sofya Streshnayva, a Russian aristocrat, forms the core. Sofya’s world crumbles as the Revolution erupts, forcing her into desperate survival. Then there’s Varinka, a cunning peasant girl entangled in Sofya’s fate, whose choices blur the lines between betrayal and survival.
Martha Hall Kelly paints these women with raw authenticity. Eliza’s privilege clashes with her compassion, Sofya’s resilience hides grief, and Varinka’s desperation makes her tragically human. Their stories mirror the era’s upheaval—opulent ballrooms versus bloodied streets, loyalty versus survival. The novel’s power lies in how their bonds fracture and reform, like roses surviving a storm.
4 answers2025-06-29 22:06:21
'Lost Roses' isn't a strict retelling of real events, but Martha Hall Kelly meticulously wove it around historical threads. The novel follows three women during World War I, and while the central characters are fictional, their worlds collide with actual figures like the Romanovs and the Russian Revolution. Kelly dug into letters and diaries to capture the era's grit—aristocrats fleeing Bolsheviks, nurses braving war zones, the opulence and collapse of empires. The book feels true because it mirrors how ordinary people got swept into history's chaos.
What fascinates me is how Kelly blends imagination with facts. Eliza Ferriday was a real humanitarian, and her friendship with Russian aristocrats inspired the story. The devastation of St. Petersburg, the refugee crises—these details are pulled from archives. Yet the emotional core, the friendships and betrayals, springs from Kelly's creativity. It's historical fiction at its best: grounded in truth but alive with invented heart.
4 answers2025-06-29 03:05:13
Reading 'Lost Roses' after 'Lilac Girls' feels like uncovering hidden threads in a vast historical tapestry. Martha Hall Kelly’s novels aren’t direct sequels, but they orbit the same emotional universe—women surviving war’s brutality with grit and grace. 'Lilac Girls' exposes Ravensbrück’s horrors through Caroline Ferriday’s real-life advocacy, while 'Lost Roses' steps back to WWI, following Eliza Ferriday (Caroline’s mother) as she navigates the Russian Revolution’s chaos. Both books spotlight resilience, but 'Lost Roses' feels grander in scope, weaving aristocracy’s collapse with refugee struggles. The connection? It’s in the Ferriday lineage—their compassion bridging generations—and the shared theme of women stitching hope from devastation.
Stylistically, 'Lost Roses' is more atmospheric, lush with pre-revolutionary opulence contrasted against peasant suffering, whereas 'Lilac Girls' punches harder with clinical precision. Yet both use peripheral characters—like Sofya in 'Lost Roses' and Kasia in 'Lilac Girls'—to humanize history’s footnotes. Kelly’s genius lies in showing how wars aren’t isolated events; they ripple through families. Eliza’s wartime trauma in Russia subtly shapes Caroline’s later activism. The books are mirrors: one reflecting the other’s shadows.
3 answers2025-06-21 05:53:41
I just finished reading 'For the Roses' and it's this wild ride about a band of misfit orphans who form their own family in the American West. The story kicks off with four boys finding an abandoned baby girl in a New York alley and deciding to raise her as their own. They name her Mary Rose and carve out a life in Montana, blending frontier survival with makeshift family bonds. The plot thickens when a wealthy Englishman shows up years later claiming Mary Rose is actually his stolen niece. The emotional tug-of-war between her birth family and adopted brothers drives the narrative, mixing raw frontier drama with deep questions about what truly makes a family. The brothers' diverse personalities - from the protective leader to the hotheaded rebel - create constant sparks, especially when they clash over how to handle the threat to their sister. The ending leaves you satisfied but nostalgic for these characters who redefine family on their own terms.
3 answers2025-06-21 17:26:21
Just finished 'For the Roses' and that ending hit hard. The final chapters reveal Clay's true parentage in a dramatic confrontation with the villainous Earl of Marsden. After years of mystery, we learn Clay is actually the long-lost heir to a noble family, stolen as a baby. The resolution comes when he chooses his found family over aristocratic life, rejecting the earl's manipulations. Mary and the other Roses stand by him through the explosive showdown, proving blood doesn't define family. The epilogue shows them rebuilding their ranch together, with Clay finally at peace with his dual identity. What stuck with me was how the author subverted expectations - instead of reclaiming his title, Clay finds happiness in the relationships he built voluntarily.
3 answers2025-06-21 19:17:41
Let me drop some knowledge about 'For the Roses'—it’s one of those gems that sticks with you. The author is Julie Garwood, a powerhouse in historical romance. She’s got this knack for blending fierce heroines with rugged settings, and 'For the Roses' is no exception. Set in Montana during the late 1800s, it follows a found family of orphans-turned-outlaws who protect their own with brutal loyalty. Garwood’s writing is crisp, her dialogue sharp, and she nails emotional beats without dragging scenes. If you dig strong female leads and slow-burn romance with a side of frontier justice, this book’s a winner. Her other works like 'The Bride' and 'The Secret' follow similar vibes—highly recommend.