6 Réponses2026-08-02 04:49:13
I disagree with the absolutist 'only one way' stance. For a reread, mixing in the Esslemont books can be fantastic. But for a first timer? Absolutely, publication order is law. You need the solid foundation of Erikson's voice, scope, and themes before you appreciate how Esslemont complements and expands the world. Jumping between them initially would be like learning two different dialects of a language simultaneously. Master one, then learn the other.
3 Réponses2026-08-02 17:25:35
I annotated my first read with a notebook, and even I didn't mess with the order. It's: GotM, DG, MoI, HoC, MT, TBH, RG, TtH, DoD, tCG. (We use acronyms to save time).
That's the sacred sequence. 'Midnight Tides' (MT) is the great filter. If you can embrace its new setting and characters, you have what it takes to finish the series. The order is a rite of passage.
7 Réponses2026-08-02 00:03:59
Honestly, I bounced off 'Gardens' twice before it clicked. The third time, I used a fan-made guide chapter by chapter. It was the only way I could get through. So my take is: follow publication order, but use every resource you need to stay afloat. There’s no prize for suffering in silence.
7 Réponses2026-08-02 03:30:44
Can we take a second to laugh at the Dramatis Personae lists? You'll be referring to those constantly, regardless of order. My copy of 'Memories of Ice' has more highlighted names and scribbled notes than a textbook. That's the Malazan experience. The 'correct' order is the one where you have access to those lists, a notepad, and maybe a fan-made map. It's an active reading experience. You're not just consuming a story; you're reconstructing a history. That's why it's so rewarding, and why getting the sequence right provides the necessary scaffolding for that reconstruction.
7 Réponses2026-08-02 23:01:57
Wait, are we talking about the big paperback ones with the single picture or the smaller ones with the painted scenes? Mine are all the smaller ones but the last two have a different logo. Is that wrong? I got them from my uncle.
2 Réponses2026-08-02 19:12:25
Honestly? The series order messes with your head in the best way. You'll be halfway through a book and suddenly a throwaway line from three novels back will snap into focus with earth-shattering implications. That 'aha!' moment is a direct product of the chosen sequence. If you read the books in a 'logical' chronological order, those moments wouldn't exist; you'd just have a linear, if complex, story. The non-chronological, perspective-shifting order is what transforms the plot into a puzzle you actively solve alongside the author.
4 Réponses2026-08-02 18:11:08
A friend of mine tried the chronological route. He gave up halfway through the second novel in that sequence because, in his words, 'it felt like reading a wiki summary, not a story.' The pacing was shot, and characters he'd just met would be referenced as if he should already care about them. The publication order builds connections and investment gradually.
Save the chronological analysis for the wiki after you've read the books. Experience the story first.
3 Réponses2026-08-02 19:37:42
Looking for a romantic through-line? Good luck. But if you want to see how a single character's journey weaves through, take Fiddler. He starts as a sapper in the Bridgeburners in 'Gardens', goes on a hellish trek in 'Deadhouse', becomes a pivotal figure in 'The Bonehunters', and his story is a key thread all the way to the end.
You won't get that if you jump around. The connection is in following these anchors—Fiddler, Kalam, Quick Ben, Tavore—as they navigate the chaos. Their growth and endurance is the spine the sprawling lore hangs on. Publication order is the only way to walk that path with them.
5 Réponses2026-08-02 12:45:56
There is a 'chronological' order floating around fan forums, but it's a trap for new listeners. It involves jumping between Erikson and Esslemont's books and is meant for rereads. For your first time, the simplicity of 1-10 is your best friend. 'Gardens of the Moon' sets a tone, 'Deadhouse Gates' expands the emotional range, and 'Memories of Ice' proves the scale is limitless. That arc only works in that order.
Audiobook-wise, they're all reliably produced. No abridged versions or weird skips. The length is daunting, but if you like immersive world-building, it's a feature. Think of each book as a season of an incredibly dense TV show. You wouldn't watch season 5 before season 1. Same principle here, but with even more interconnected plotlines.
4 Réponses2025-12-18 19:20:36
Man, the Malazan series is a beast to tackle, but oh-so-rewarding! The core reading order is straightforward: start with 'Gardens of the Moon' and follow the publication sequence—'Deadhouse Gates', 'Memories of Ice', and so on, all the way to 'The Crippled God'. But here's where it gets juicy. If you want the full experience, weave in Ian Esslemont's companion novels like 'Night of Knives' after 'House of Chains'. The world feels even richer when you see both authors' perspectives.
Some fans swear by chronological order, but I wouldn't recommend that for first-timers—Erikson's writing assumes you'll piece things together gradually. The confusion is part of the charm! Personally, I took breaks between books to digest the lore, and it made those 'aha!' moments hit harder when connections finally clicked.