Who Owns The Copyright To 'Tomorrow Will Be Better' Track?

2025-10-28 09:56:03 307

9 Answers

Piper
Piper
2025-10-29 21:01:19
I’ve always loved that communal vibe of 'tomorrow will be better,' but in practice the copyright picture is split. The people who wrote the music and lyrics own the composition copyright (usually administered by a publisher and a performing rights society), while every distinct recording has its own master owner, typically the record label or producer who released it.

So if you want to use the song, figure out whether you need permission for the composition, the master, or both — covers versus using an existing recording make a big difference. I tend to hunt the liner notes and the rights society database first; that usually points me to the right contact. It’s a bit of legwork, but it keeps the song’s spirit intact for me whenever I listen.
Valerie
Valerie
2025-10-30 15:44:20
I get curious about who actually holds the rights whenever an old charity record pops up, and 'tomorrow will be better' is a classic example. Broadly speaking, there are two separate copyrights to think about: the composition (lyrics and melody) and the sound recording (the specific performance captured on a record or tape). In most cases the composition copyright belongs to the songwriters or their publishers, while the recording copyright belongs to the label or production company that funded and released the recording.

For 'tomorrow will be better' specifically, the original creators—those who wrote the melody and lyrics—would normally own the composition rights unless they assigned or licensed them away. The record company or collective that organized and produced the 1985 charity single typically owns the recording copyright, unless the performers or organizers agreed to different terms for a charity release. To be sure, I always check the liner notes, look up performing-rights databases (like ASCAP, BMI, PRS or a local equivalent), or the release credits; that often tells you who the publishers and labels are.

In short: expect the songwriters/publishers to control the composition and the producing label or rights administrator to control the master recording, though charity releases sometimes have special agreements. It's a neat piece of music history that still tugs at me.
Jack
Jack
2025-10-30 22:26:19
I like to think of copyright on 'tomorrow will be better' as a two-part cake: the recipe (lyrics and tune) and the photo of the cake (the recording). The recipe is usually owned by the people who wrote the song or their publishers; the photo is owned by the label or production team that made the recording. Charity singles sometimes give away publishing income or set special licenses, so that complicates things.

If you want the exact owner name, look at the original release credits or check major performing-rights databases—those listings usually show the publisher and the songwriter names. That’s how I figure stuff like this out, and it keeps me happily busy.
Blake
Blake
2025-10-31 21:59:55
Quick take: the composition rights of 'tomorrow will be better' sit with the credited lyricist(s) and composer(s) and their publisher(s), while each recorded version is owned by the label or the entity that produced that recording. Now the longer bit, because music rights are a little like a many-headed hydra.

Over the decades many charity singles get reissued, covered, and rearranged, and each act of recording spawns a new master copyright. If you see a TV montage using a radio edit from an old fundraiser, that specific audio is licensed from whatever archive or label controls that master; if someone else performs a cover on YouTube, they’re dealing with the publishing side (and maybe YouTube’s licensing system). Translation, adaptation, or new arrangements may create separate derivative rights as well.

My usual detective route is: check the release credits, search performing-rights society databases for the composition, find the label for the release, and then contact the publisher/label directly. It feels bureaucratic, but it’s the fastest way to get a straight answer — and I still turn the volume up whenever those harmonies hit.
Ian
Ian
2025-11-01 06:55:47
I get the appeal of 'tomorrow will be better' — it's the kind of collective song that lives in so many hearts, but legally it's quite ordinary: the songwriters (and their publisher) own the songwriting copyright, and whoever owns each sound recording (the record label or the producers) owns the master copyright. Because this track was recorded as a big star-studded charity single, you'll often find many contributors credited for performance rather than ownership.

For practical licensing, you usually need two clearances: a mechanical or publishing license for reproducing the composition, and a master use license if you want to use a specific recording. For covers you generally only need the publishing side; for using a recording in media you need both. To find exact names, I go to performing rights databases, check the CD/album liner notes, and look up ISRC/ISWC codes where available — those codes help trace publishers and recording owners. It's not glamorous, but it works, and the song still gives me chills whenever I hear it.
Riley
Riley
2025-11-01 13:07:36
My curiosity runs toward the legal mechanics more than trivia, so I break it down like this: the copyright interests for 'tomorrow will be better' are likely split between the song creators (for the musical composition) and the entity that financed and distributed the recording (for the master). Historically, many charity singles were arranged so that royalties or publishing income would go to a cause, but that doesn’t always transfer the underlying copyrights—sometimes only the income or certain licenses are assigned.

To verify ownership in a practical way, I’d scan the original release’s credits for publisher names, search performing-rights organization catalogs (ASCAP, BMI, PRS, JASRAC or regional equivalents), and check the record label listed on the release. Copyright duration varies by country (life of the author plus decades), so older works may still be protected. I find the blend of music, law, and social purpose in records like 'tomorrow will be better' endlessly compelling.
Scarlett
Scarlett
2025-11-01 13:36:55
When I dig into questions like who owns the copyright of 'tomorrow will be better', I split the issue into two parts: who wrote the song and who released that particular recording. The writers (composer and lyricist) normally own the musical composition and its publishing rights, unless they signed those rights to a publisher or handed them off as part of a charity arrangement. The physical recording—the master—usually belongs to the record label or whoever paid for the studio time and production, although sometimes those masters are donated or licensed differently for charity projects.

If you want a definitive name, I usually check the track credits on the original single or compilation, then confirm with publishing databases or the local performing rights organization. For older multi-artist charity records, credits can show a mix of individual songwriters, publishers, and a label or organizing committee credited as the rights holder. At the end of the day I tend to treat the composition and the master separately and double-check both sources before drawing conclusions—keeps things honest and interesting to research.
Addison
Addison
2025-11-02 20:32:28
I tend to think about this from the perspective of someone who streams, covers, or wants to use a track like 'tomorrow will be better' in a fan video, and the practical rule of thumb is simple: the songwriters/publishers own the composition, and the label or producer owns that specific master recording, unless there was an explicit charity agreement transferring rights.

In today’s world you often need two licenses to use the song legally: a sync license for pairing music with visuals (from the composition owner/publisher) and a master use license (from whoever controls the recording). If the original release was set up for charity, the money flow might be different but the underlying copyrights could still be retained by the creators or label. Personally, that layered structure of rights always makes music licensing a bit of a puzzle, which I secretly enjoy solving when I have the credits in hand.
Declan
Declan
2025-11-03 15:39:27
I've dug into the credits for 'tomorrow will be better' more than a few times over the years, and the short practical version is: the composition (lyrics and melody) belongs to whoever is listed as the songwriters and their publisher(s), while each recorded performance (the master) is owned by the label or the parties who funded and released that particular recording.

This matters because 'tomorrow will be better' is a charity ensemble song with many performers and multiple recorded versions. That means there isn't a single universal owner for every audio file you hear — the songwriters/publishers control the underlying work, and separate labels or rights holders control each master recording. If someone created an arrangement or a translation, that version may carry its own rights too.

If I needed to clear usage, I'd hunt down the original liner notes, check the composition's ISWC/registration with the relevant performing rights organization, and contact the publisher and the record label that released the specific version. It’s not public domain, so permission is still required for commercial use — but digging through the credits usually points to the people who own the rights. I always find it strangely comforting to know the creators keep control, even for charity projects.
View All Answers
Scan code to download App

Related Books

Who owns my heart?
Who owns my heart?
Who owns my heart? Jason or Ryder? Rich boy or bad boyEmily Collins is a years old girl who came back to her native country Florida for her studies in Edgewood High. She didn't know that this is her life-changing decision. She met a bad boy next door. Girls fall head over heels for Ryder. He's so good in skipping classes and getting himself into trouble without giving damn care about it. On the other side, there's another boy in Edgewood high who's equal to Ryder's range. Jason's son of a famous actress Emma Byrne. He's rich and a smoking hot model in his years. He always gets whatever he wants.Emily's life turned upside down when both boys entered her life at the same time. This was how it supposed to happen. She's no longer an ordinary girl with a normal life anymore.
Not enough ratings
66 Chapters
The Devil Who Owns Me
The Devil Who Owns Me
Trisha is being haunted by her pasts she wanted to forget. They keep coming back and she knows she needed to face them in order to move on. But what if one of it makes her tremble with fear while the other one was with a mix of desire? Can she really escape them? What she doesn't know is that one is willing to protect her no matter what, even binding and branding her with the devil's possession to do so.
Not enough ratings
11 Chapters
Someone Better
Someone Better
Kendra found out her boyfriend cheated on her while in a long distance relationship after visiting him. Kendra just loses her grandmother who raised her and needed someone to cheer her up that's why she decided to visit her boyfriend. But she did not expect to hear this: "Harder James! Harder!" A soft growl came from inside his apartment. "Oh yeah baby!" James replied. Kendra was stunned as she knelt outside the door of James' apartment..
8
108 Chapters
Better Brother, Better Life
Better Brother, Better Life
At the very moment Phoebe Stanton miscarries, her husband, Connor Russell, is celebrating the return of his first love. To him, her three years of devotion and companionship mean nothing more than being a live-in maid and cook. Phoebe gives up on him and decides to divorce. Everyone in their circle knows that Phoebe is clingy and impossible to shake off. "I bet she'll come crawling in a day." Connor sneers. "A day? That's too long—half a day at most." But the moment Phoebe signs the divorce papers, she decides never to look back. She throws herself into a new life. She revives her career, which she once abandoned, builds new connections, and meets new people. As time goes on, Connor no longer sees even a trace of Phoebe at home. He begins to panic. At an industry summit, he finally spots her, surrounded by admirers. Desperate, he pushes forward. "Phoebe, haven't you had enough of this tantrum?" But Gideon Blackwood suddenly steps in front of her, shoving Connor aside, his very demeanor chilling the air. "Don't touch my woman." Connor has never loved Phoebe. But now that he does, it's already too late. There's no longer a place for him in her world.
10
169 Chapters
Lady of the dirt track
Lady of the dirt track
Jennifer Lockwood and Greg Davenport thought they would be together forever. Breakups and differences in hobbies couldn't separate them. But then came the phone and text that put an end to all that dreaming. He decided to go on a journey that she couldn't follow him on. Meanwhile, she ended up with her original plan of going to law school. Everything goes well for her until a devastating call leaves her shattered. Now she's left deciding. Deciding about her future, about what to say to the man in the bed in front of her, deciding whether she can love. While he falls in love with her, she's left with the memories of everything that happened before. Can she return to that life where her heart got broken, or is she forced to walk away and break his?
Not enough ratings
76 Chapters
Better Luna
Better Luna
Mia, a human girl living between wolves. Supposedly adopted. Her heart is set on Ethan. The next Alpha inline. But he is unable to claim the title if he is not fitted with a mate. He doesn't wish to be mated with some human, but his fate is already chosen by his parents. Mia finds out about her history and where she came from. What shocks her the most is what she finds out about her true self.
Not enough ratings
52 Chapters

Related Questions

What Inspired The Author To Write The Better Half Novel?

7 Answers2025-10-22 16:54:33
The opening line caught me off guard and pulled me in, and from there I kept thinking about why the author felt compelled to write 'The Better Half'. For me, it reads like a love letter to contradictions—how two people can reflect the best and worst of each other. I suspect the author was inspired by everyday relationships, the little compromises and private cruelties that make up lives together, but also by a hunger to riff on romantic clichés. There’s a wink toward familiar tropes and then a stubborn refusal to let them sit comfortable; the characters are vivid because they’re not neat archetypes but messy, contradictory humans. Beyond the romance angle, I can see influences from a mix of things the author probably consumed: melancholic songs that linger for days, films that dissect memory, and novels that blur moral lines. The way perspective flips between protagonists feels deliberate, like the writer wanted readers to see how subjective truth can be—how one person’s tenderness is another’s suffocating habit. That suggests personal observation: maybe the author watched a relationship fray and wanted to wrestle with those feelings on paper. On a craft level, the prose leans into sensory detail and small domestic moments, which tells me the author aimed to create intimacy. So the inspiration seems twofold: personal emotional curiosity about what partnership does to identity, and a literary urge to experiment with perspective and tone. I walked away feeling seen in my own messy attachments, and that’s what stayed with me most.

Will The Better Half Get A Movie Adaptation In 2025?

7 Answers2025-10-22 11:05:22
My excitement about adaptations makes me want to yell into the void, but I’ll try to be measured: unless there’s already a stealth deal underway, getting 'The Better Half' into cinemas by 2025 feels optimistic. Film pipelines are notoriously slow — rights have to be optioned, a script written and revised, a director and cast attached, then pre-production, shooting, and post. That usually stretches over more than a year. On the brighter side, studios and streamers have been fast-tracking properties when they smell hype, so if a production company grabbed the rights last year and pushed hard, a late-2025 release isn't totally impossible. I like to imagine what a speedy adaptation would look like: tight script focusing on core themes, bold casting choices, and a director willing to trim subplots. If they went for a streaming movie it could bypass some theatrical distribution headaches, which helps timing. Still, I think a 2026 release is more realistic unless there are already cameras rolling. Either way, I'm excited by the possibility and will be watching trade sites like a hawk—would love to see how they handle the emotional beats and pacing in any version.

Why Does The Villain Say Better Run In Stranger Things?

7 Answers2025-10-22 18:52:04
That line—'better run'—lands so effectively in 'Stranger Things' because it's doing double duty: it's a taunt and a clock. I hear it as the villain compressing time for the prey; saying those two words gives the scene an immediate beat, like a metronome that speeds up until something snaps. Cinematically, it cues the camera to tighten, the music to drop, and the characters to go into survival mode. It's not just about telling someone to flee — it's telling the audience that the safe moment is over. On a character level it reveals intent. Whoever says it wants you to know they enjoy the chase, or they want you to panic and make a mistake. In 'Stranger Things' monsters and villains are often part-predator, part-psychologist: a line like that pressures a character into an emotional reaction, and that reaction drives the plot forward. I love how simple words can create that sharp, cold clarity in a scene—hits me every time.

How To Create Effective Sie Exam Study Materials For Better Retention?

1 Answers2025-10-23 05:16:19
Creating effective study materials for an exam can really make a difference in how well information sticks. A big part of the process for me has always been about tailoring my resources to suit my learning style while also making them engaging and interactive. First things first, I focus on breaking down the material into manageable chunks. This helps prevent the classic overwhelming feeling we can all relate to! I often use flashcards for key terms and concepts since they promote active recall, which is critical for retention. The act of quizzing myself feels like a fun mini-game rather than studying, plus I can use colorful markers to make them visually appealing. In addition to flashcards, I love creating mind maps. There’s something so satisfying about visually connecting ideas and concepts in a way that makes sense to me. I’ll start with a central theme in the middle and branch out into subtopics, like a visual web of knowledge. Whenever I look at my mind maps, it almost feels like a quick review without diving back into textbooks. Pairing colors with different branches can also help solidify topics in my mind – who doesn’t love a rainbow of knowledge? Another technique that has won me over is teaching someone else. It sounds cliché, but explaining concepts out loud to a friend or even just to myself helps solidify my understanding. This method highlights any areas I might not have grasped fully, and it often prompts me to dive deeper into that content. Plus, it's a great way to evade boredom! I sometimes record myself explaining key concepts and listen to it while doing chores or commuting, effectively turning downtime into productive study time. Lastly, I incorporate practice tests into my study routine. After I've reviewed everything, sitting down with a practice exam gives me insight into where I'm still shaky. It’s a great way to familiarize myself with the test format, too, which can ease anxiety when the actual day rolls around. Overall, the key is finding a blend of methods that keep studying fresh and enjoyable. Creating study materials is a personal journey, and little tweaks can make a big difference. It’s like crafting your unique potion for success in retention and understanding! Happy studying, and may your exam preparation be as rewarding as the results!

What Libraries Complement React-Native-Webrtc For Better Functionality?

5 Answers2025-10-23 19:59:29
One fascinating aspect of working with React Native and WebRTC is the multitude of libraries that can enhance functionality. I’ve personally found that 'react-native-callkeep' is a fantastic addition if you're looking to integrate VoIP functionalities. This library allows you to manage call-related activities, helping mimic the native experience of phone calls, which is essential for any real-time communication app. Another library that deserves a shout-out is 'react-native-permissions', providing a robust way to handle permissions within your app. WebRTC needs access to the camera and microphone, and this library streamlines that process, ensuring your users have a smooth experience. It handles permission requests elegantly, and this is crucial because permissions can sometimes be a pain point in user experience. Don't overlook 'react-native-reanimated' either! For applications that require sophisticated animations during calls or video chats, this library can help implement fluid animations. This could enhance user interactions significantly, making your app feel more polished and engaging. With tools like these, your WebRTC implementation can shine even brighter, making your app not just functional but a joy to use as well! I’ve integrated some of these libraries in my projects, and wow, the difference it makes is incredible, transforming the overall vibe of the app.

Where Can I Stream 'Tomorrow Will Be Better' Legally?

9 Answers2025-10-28 20:10:09
Hunting for a legal stream of 'tomorrow will be better' can feel like a little treasure hunt, but there’s a straightforward way I go about it that usually pays off. First, I check the big, global services — Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV/iTunes, Google Play Movies, and YouTube Movies — because many films and shows land there for purchase or rental even if they’re not included with a subscription. If nothing shows up, I switch to region- and genre-specific platforms: for East Asian releases I’ll try Bilibili, iQIYI, Tencent Video, and Rakuten Viki, and for indie or festival titles I look at MUBI, Kanopy (if I have a library card), and the Criterion Channel. When I can’t find a direct stream, I look at the official social media or website for 'tomorrow will be better' — distributors often post links to legal viewing options. I also use aggregators like JustWatch or Reelgood to confirm current availability in my country. Personally, I prefer buying or renting the piece on a trustworthy platform rather than relying on doubtful uploads; it’s better for the creators and avoids sketchy sources. Hope that helps you find a good, legal way to watch it — I always feel better supporting the real deal.

Coraline Book Vs Movie: Which Is Better?

5 Answers2025-11-10 21:50:19
Reading 'Coraline' as a kid was like peering into a twisted fairy tale—Neil Gaiman’s prose had this eerie, lyrical quality that made the Other World feel both mesmerizing and deeply unsettling. The book’s pacing lets you marinate in Coraline’s loneliness before the horror kicks in, and her internal monologue adds layers the movie can’t replicate. Henry Selick’s stop-motion adaptation is gorgeous, no doubt, but it amps up the spectacle with bold visuals and a faster tempo. The movie’s soundtrack and button-eyed creatures are iconic, yet it sacrifices some of the book’s subtle dread for family-friendly thrills. If you crave atmosphere and psychological depth, the book wins. For a visual feast, the movie’s your pick. Funny how the book’s quieter moments—like Coraline talking to the cat—linger in my memory longer than the film’s chases. Both are masterpieces, but the novel feels like a secret whispered in the dark, while the movie’s a campfire story told with puppets.

How Can I Read People Like A Book For Better Communication?

3 Answers2025-11-10 19:48:17
Reading people isn't about decoding secret signals—it's about paying attention to the little things. I picked this up after binging shows like 'Lie to Me' and realizing how much communication happens beyond words. The way someone leans in when they're interested, how their voice tightens when they're uncomfortable, or even the pauses between their sentences—it all tells a story. Body language is huge, but don’t treat it like a cheat sheet. Context matters. A crossed arm might mean defensiveness, or maybe they’re just cold. The trick is to observe patterns, not single gestures. Conversations are like improv scenes—you listen, adapt, and build. If someone keeps steering the chat back to a specific topic, that’s their spotlight. Reflect their energy; if they’re animated, match it (within reason). But authenticity is key—people sniff out performative listening fast. I learned this the hard way when a friend called me out for 'therapist nodding.' Now, I focus on asking open-ended questions that don’t feel like interrogations. 'What’s your take on…?' works way better than 'Why do you think that?' Also, silence is your ally. Letting a pause hang often coaxes out gold nuggets they wouldn’t share otherwise.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status