Is The Queen'S Nose Suitable For Children?

I've always been fascinated by how a single name can mean very different things depending on who’s retelling it. In Lewis Carroll’s own world — specifically in 'Through the Looking-Glass' — the Red Queen is basically a chess piece brought to life: a strict, officious figure who represents order, rules, and the harsh logic of the chessboard. Carroll never gives her a Hollywood-style backstory; she exists as a function in a game, doling out moves and advice, scolding Alice with an air of inevitability. That pared-down origin is part of the charm — she’s allegory and obstacle more than person, and her temperament comes from the game she embodies rather than from childhood trauma or palace intrigue. Over the last century, storytellers have had fun filling in what Carroll left blank. The character most people visualize when someone says 'Red Queen' often mixes her up with the Queen of Hearts from 'Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland', who is the more hot-headed court tyrant famous for shouting 'Off with their heads!'. Then there’s the modern reinvention: in Tim Burton’s 'Alice in Wonderland' the Red Queen — Iracebeth — is reimagined with a dramatic personal history, sibling rivalry with the White Queen, and physical exaggeration that externalizes her insecurity. Games like 'American McGee’s Alice' go further and turn the figure into a psychological mirror of Alice herself, a manifestation of trauma and madness. Personally, I love that ambiguity. A character that began as a chess piece has become a canvas for authors and creators to explore power, rage, and the mirror-image of order. Whether she’s symbolic, schizophrenic, or surgically reimagined with a massive head, the Red Queen keeps being rewritten to fit the anxieties of each era — and that makes tracking her origin oddly thrilling to me.

Sitting down with a sketchbook and a cup of tea, I like to think of the nose as a set of simple planes before I worry about skin texture or tiny highlights. Start by squashing the anatomy into broad, readable shapes: bridge, tip, nostril wings. Blocking those planes with a midtone helps me place where the light will hit and where shadows fall, so the nose sits convincingly on the face rather than floating like a sticker. After blocking, I work in values — not colors — using a soft brush or a well-blended pencil. The trick I keep coming back to is subtlety: soft edges around the bridge and alar creases, a slightly harder edge under the nostrils where the cast shadow meets the face, and a faint core shadow along the side plane. I also use ambient occlusion: the deepest tones where skin meets skin (under the tip, inside nostrils) and a faint rim highlight opposite the main light to sell volume. For digital work I love a low-opacity multiply layer for shadows and an overlay or soft light layer for warmer midtones and a tiny, cool specular highlight where the light grazes oily skin. For traditional media, cross-hatching and gentle blending do the same job. Studying noses from life and doing quick value thumbnails changed my work more than chasing tiny details — a solid value foundation makes everything readable and believable, and that always makes me smile when a face finally clicks.

I still get a little thrill when I think about how a chess novel became one of my favorite underdog stories. Walter Tevis wrote 'The Queen's Gambit' — the book was published in 1983 — and he wasn't a chess grandmaster, but he knew how to write about obsession. I'd first bumped into his voice through 'The Hustler' and 'The Color of Money', so when I picked up 'The Queen's Gambit' it felt familiar: lean, sharp, with damaged people who live and breathe a single game. Tevis drew inspiration from two main wells: his own battles with addiction and the intense, almost gladiatorial world of competitive games. He'd written about hustling pool before, so swapping pools for chess felt natural — same rhythms of practice, psychological warfare, and small victories that mean everything. The book also rides the era's chess fever; the Cold War rivalry and figures like Bobby Fischer made chess feel cinematic in the public mind, and Tevis used that backdrop to heighten the stakes for his fictional prodigy. He wanted to explore loneliness, triumph, and the costs of genius, and making his protagonist a girl gave the story an extra twist because women were rarely the center of that particular competitive arena. Reading it on a rainy afternoon, I felt less like I was studying chess and more like I was eavesdropping on someone's inward battle — which is exactly what Tevis was trying to show. It’s a gritty, intimate ride that made me want to look up famous games and then play until my hands cramped.

I still get a little buzz thinking about how 'The Queen's Gambit' made chess feel cinematic without totally betraying the game. As someone who's taught at a community chess club and watched dozens of tournament streams, the show gets a surprising amount right: the board positions you see on screen are mostly plausible and rooted in real tactical and positional ideas, the clock drama and time-trouble moments ring true, and the way a player can rehearse sequences in their head — the visualized board in Beth's mind — is a legit part of serious study. The consultants (real grandmasters and coaches) did their homework, so the moves you see aren't random TV filler; they're built from actual principles and occasionally lifted or inspired by historic games. That said, it's also TV, and it compresses and elevates for drama. Beth's meteoric rise, the neatness of some of her brilliant turns, and the way entire tournaments are condensed into a few intense scenes are storytelling choices. The social context — prejudice against women, Soviet training systems, and the loneliness of travel — is dramatized but based on truth. Some technical details are simplified: the show won't teach you opening theory or the deep endgame technique you need to beat a titled player. But as a portrayal of obsession, training, and competitive tension, it's one of the most authentic-feeling chess dramas out there. If the series hooked you, try replaying the on-screen games on a site like Lichess or Chess.com; you'll see how the moves stand up under engine scrutiny, and that turns watching into real study, which I loved doing after my first watch.

Watching 'The Queen's Gambit' made me want to sit at a board and play 1.d4 for a week straight. Beth Harmon, as a character, is most strongly associated with the Queen's Gambit proper — she opens with 1.d4 and routinely plays 2.c4 to challenge Black's center. The series showcases Queen's Gambit structures a lot: both the Queen's Gambit Accepted and Declined themes appear, and you can see how she exploits the pawn tension and piece activity those lines create. What I loved was how the show used those familiar opening shapes to tell a story about her style — controlled, positional, but ready to snap into sharp tactics when the moment calls for it. Beyond the titular gambit, the show peppers in other mainstream openings to keep the games realistic and varied. You’ll spot Ruy Lopez-style positions and occasional Sicilian structures when opponents play 1.e4; when she’s Black, lines with Nimzo-Indian and Queen’s Gambit Declined flavor show up as logical replies to 1.d4. There are also hints of hypermodern systems — Catalan-ish ideas and English-like setups — depending on the movie-software choreography and the opponent’s choices. The producers worked with chess consultants, so the repertoire shown isn’t random: it reflects a mix of classic opening theory and dramatic, instructive positions. If you’re trying to emulate Beth, start with 1.d4 and learn the main Queen’s Gambit lines, but don’t be afraid to study the Ruy Lopez and Sicilian so you can recognize and respond to them fluently.

I binged 'The Queen's Gambit' over a long weekend and then spent the next week lurking on chess forums — the buzz was unreal. A lot of people in the real chess community were genuinely pleased: they praised the series for making the feel of a chess tournament believable (the tension, the body language, the ambience). Many posters pointed out that the positions shown on screen were often based on real, famous games or were carefully crafted by consultants so they would look legitimate to viewers who know their openings. That attention to detail mattered; when grandmasters and tournament regulars nodded along, it felt like a win for the show. At the same time, there was healthy critique. A number of players noted small glitches — sequences that were stitched together from different games, some impossible mate patterns that would never pass muster in a strict analysis, and the occasional inaccuracy in move order. People also debated the portrayal of rapid improvement and the solitary genius trope: while Beth's rise made for great drama, many real players reminded each other that actual tournament success usually involves long study, coaches, and a slow grind. Best part for me was seeing the community split between protective purists and excited newcomers — both camps ended up talking about chess more than before, which felt lovely. Perhaps most tangibly, the chess world loved the attention. Chess clubs filled up, online play saw an influx of beginners, and conversations about openings (including the titular Queen's Gambit) popped up at coffee shops. I'm still teaching a neighbor how to castle because of that show, and that small victory is what I'll remember most.

I get a little giddy every time this question comes up because ‘Ravenna’ and ‘Raven Queen’ live in two different corners of fandom and both have lines that sting or sparkle in different ways. To avoid stepping on anyone’s toes, I’ll handle both: Queen Ravenna from the live-action realm of ‘Snow White and the Huntsman’ (and its sequel) and Raven Queen from the doll/web series world of ‘Ever After High’. I’ll give the quotes I think people remember most and a quick note about why they land — sometimes I’ll paraphrase because some lines are more famous for their emotion than exact wording. From Queen Ravenna in ‘Snow White and the Huntsman’: the classic mirror line — the story’s heartbeat — shows up in various forms, and what sticks is the chilling demand to be proven the fairest. Think of it as the dark chorus: 'Mirror, tell me who is fairest of them all.' It’s simple, vain, and terrifying because it reveals a hunger that can never be sated. Another line that gets under my skin is when she says something like 'I will remain beautiful even if I must kill to do it' — it’s not always verbatim in transcripts, but the sentiment of preserving youth and beauty at any cost is what the character is built on. There’s also a quieter, almost bitter one where she mocks love and vulnerability: 'Weakness makes you beautiful, but not powerful.' Those moments are memorable because her voice flips from fragile to predator; you can almost see the mask fall in the silence after she speaks. Switching gears to Raven Queen from ‘Ever After High’ — she’s the defiant, destiny-questioning kid of the Evil Queen trope, and her lines are all about choice and identity. The fan-favorite refrain is basically 'Not my destiny' or 'This isn't my story' — short, punchy, and the core of why fans latch on to her. She also has moments like 'I don't want to be the villain in someone else's book' and 'I want to write my own ending' (again, sometimes paraphrased), which capture that teenage, messy, hopeful rebellion. There are softer lines too — when she confesses fear about becoming what people expect, you get quotes along the lines of 'I'm scared I'm going to hurt the people I love' — which makes her feel real, not just cartoon-angsty. Those quotes land because they turn a fairy-tale archetype into someone you’d sit beside on a subway and commiserate with. I tend to approach these lines not as quotations to recite, but as emotional spikes I can replay when I want a mood: Queen Ravenna’s lines give me that delicious, theatrical dread that’s perfect for a moody playlist, while Raven Queen’s snippets are my rallying cry on days I’m resisting expectations. If you want exact phrasing from a scene, watching the clip once more is such a fun little ritual — it’s one of my favorite ways to re-feel why a character once hit me so hard. Which of the two vibes are you leaning toward — high-tragedy villainy or earnest rebel energy? I can dig up more scene-accurate lines if you tell me which one you want to sink your teeth into.

If my nose piercing falls out before it's fully healed, I’d gently clean the area with saline solution to avoid any infection. I’d then try to reinsert the earring carefully, making sure my hands are clean. If it’s giving me trouble, I wouldn’t force it. Instead, I’d consider heading to a professional piercer. Keeping an eye on any signs of infection is key during this healing process. Also, I'd avoid touching or playing with it too much. Patience is vital to ensure it heals properly.