Library

Friedrich Seitz

Samantha didn't know what she was, until Alpha Jack and Luna Sara saved her from her old alpha. He was a sick man, driven mad by the loss of his luna and he abused Samantha for it. She was a true omega. Her new pack taught her that she was a gift from the Moon Goddess herself. She has the ability to calm any wolf and because of this gift, her new pack is thriving. She also causes every wolf to become extremely protective over her, because of this, it's doubtful that she will be blessed with a mate. A mate is supposed to be protective and it would be difficult for the Moon Goddess to find a wolf strong enough to withstand the pull of an omega mate.Samantha is glad that she won't have to worry about a mate. She doesn't want to trust anyone outside of her pack and strong males are extremely untrustworthy in her experience.Everything is going well until her old pack begs her new one for help. The pack's new alpha is Sammy's mate. Can Sammy trust the new alpha or will he mistreat her? Can she forgive her old pack and save them from themselves?

9.8

54 Chapters

Bogus Billionaire

Betrayed by her fiancé, Caroline Evans decides on a whim to marry someone else. Everyone mocks her for the decision of giving up on the heir to the Morrison family and choosing some poor punk instead. However, that poor punk is actually secretly the top wealthiest person around, newly back in the country to invest in its development. He’s also her ex’s uncle! Lamenting about being tricked, Caroline Evans insists on a divorce. But her husband corners her and says unblinkingly, “That billionaire is not me. That guy had cosmetic surgery to look like me.” Looking at his handsome face, Caroline believes it. “What a curse to have the same face as someone of the Morrison family!” The next day, the world is surprised to find that the heir of the Morrison family has been kicked out and now has nothing. As for the newly crowned top billionaire, he starts wearing a mask to hide his attractive features.

9.5

1398 Chapters

Resent, Reject, Regret

Even the coldest heart would soon grow warm if she kept holding on to it. That was what she believed. That was why she became his unloved placeholder of a wife. Unfortunately, all her devotion only led to a heartless divorce. “She’s awake now,” he told her. “Step down and step away, you miserable knock-off.”Then, he left. When he came back, it was because he needed her to do something only an impostor could do: go to jail for his dream girl’s crime. Deirdre McKinnon was condemned to perdition. She lost her baby before it was born. She lost her face to violence. She lost the ability to see. It was two months of a hell-like nightmare. At last, something died inside her heart. Two years later, she found herself another man, but when Brendan Brighthall met her by pure happenstance, a new feeling was born in his heart: jealousy. There were no means too terrible, no scheme too underhanded—not if it meant he’d possess Deirdre’s heart again. And yet, she simply refused to love him anymore.“What do you want me to do, Deirdre McKinnon?! What must I do to go back to the good old days?” His eyes turned red. “I’ll give you everything I have!”“You gave me a copper trinket two years ago. It was a sorry excuse for a wedding ring, and yet I cared for it as though it was the most precious jewel in the world…“But now? Nothing you can give would be even remotely worthwhile. Not even you.”

7.7

1573 Chapters

Return to Power

Upon living for 5000 years, he had witnessed the great battle between Alexander and Moros, Asclepius sampling all herbs, and Cassander harnessing nature to prevent floods. He had witnessed the rise and fall of numerous grand empires. Through the ages past, he persisted—just like a traveler, outside looking in.Once again returned to the present, he remained the discriminated son-in-law.The mother-in-law and sister-in-law despised him, while the stunning wife only gave him the cold shoulder. With his return, his destiny will never be the same as before.Possessing 5000 years of heritage, he was the man with unparalleled knowledge, perfect mastery of all arts, and unsurpassable by another human by any standards.

9.2

2490 Chapters

His reluctant Luna

18+ mature content. Alice has her life all sorted, she has a good job, a wonderful fiancee. Apart from a little secret, she is a werewolf, her life was in her control. After losing her parents in a rogue attack she had been sent away to live with her aunt, a keeper. Alice was what one would call an urban werewolf who had no intention of finding her mate. But things didn't turn out as expected when the most handsome, powerful and dangerous Alpha of US claimed her as his mate. With her wolf in the heat but her mind warning her against the union. How will she resist being his Luna?

9.4

110 Chapters

Married at First Sight

Since the day Serenity got hitched to a stranger on their blind date, she had assumed married life would be ordinary but respectful and mundane. It never crossed her mind that her new husband would be clingy like a piece of gum stuck to the bottom of a shoe. To her utmost surprise, he could make her troubles disappear whenever she was in a fix. Despite her questioning, her husband would always pass it off as luck. Until one day, she watched an interview with a local billionaire known for fussing over his wife. That was when she noticed the uncanny resemblance of the billionaire to her husband. The wife whom he was showering attention on turned out to be her!

9.3

4810 Chapters

What Is Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche Beyond Good And Evil?

4 Answers2025-09-06 07:50:34

Okay, here’s how I would describe it when I try to explain to a friend over coffee: 'Beyond Good and Evil' is one of Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s sharpest provocations. It’s not a gentle textbook; it’s a ragged, brilliant polemic that rips apart the comfortable moral assumptions of 19th-century Europe and invites you to re-evaluate why you call something ‘good’ or ‘evil.’ Nietzsche uses aphorisms, biting critiques of philosophers, and poetic turns of phrase to push the idea that morality isn’t some universal law but the product of historical forces, power relationships, and human drives.

Reading it feels like being handed a mirror that distorts in fascinating ways. He introduces ideas like perspectivism — that truth is always from some standpoint — and the will to power, which is less a tidy doctrine and more a way of sensing what motivates life and creativity. He contrasts what he calls ‘master’ and ‘slave’ moralities and urges a revaluation of values. If you’ve seen 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra' or dipped into 'On the Genealogy of Morality', 'Beyond Good and Evil' is where some of those themes get more directly argued.

I usually tell people to expect to be provoked rather than instructed. It’s dense, occasionally petulant, occasionally sublime, and it rewards slow, repeated reading. I still dog-ear passages and argue with him out loud on the train — and that’s part of the fun.

Why Is Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche Beyond Good And Evil Debated?

4 Answers2025-09-06 07:58:22

Honestly, the way 'Beyond Good and Evil' rattled me the first time I read it was exactly why people still argue about it — Nietzsche refuses to be pinned down. The book plays like a philosophical grenade: short aphorisms, provocative rhetorical flourishes, sudden metaphors, and sentences that sound like both diagnosis and dare. That style creates interpretive space; some readers hear a clinical dismantling of moral metaphysics, others hear a manifesto for radical self-creation.

On top of the style, Nietzsche takes aim at foundational assumptions — truth, morality, reason, and the value of compassion — and recasts them as historically and psychologically rooted. Is he saying all values are arbitrary, or that we should actively create stronger, life-affirming values? That's a live split. Add to that the notorious chestnuts: 'will to power' (is it metaphysical or metaphorical?), perspectivism (is truth relative or perspectival in a subtler sense?), and the tension between critique and prescription. Then you get translation issues and later political misuse: his aphorisms were later bent by others into whole-cloth ideologies he likely would have despised. Reading 'Beyond Good and Evil' is like walking on thin ice — exhilarating, risky, and impossible to summarize without losing the sting — so debates are practically guaranteed, and honestly, that uncertainty is part of the thrill for me.

Where Can I Read Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche Beyond Good And Evil?

4 Answers2025-09-06 16:15:55

I get a little giddy talking about where to hunt down 'Beyond Good and Evil'—it's one of those books I like to dip into on rainy afternoons. If you want something immediate and free, start with Project Gutenberg or Internet Archive: they often host older English translations and scanned editions that you can read in your browser or download as ePub/PDF. For the German original, look for 'Jenseits von Gut und Böse' on Wikisource; reading a few paragraphs in the original (if you know any German) gives a different rhythm to Nietzsche's aphorisms.

If you prefer a polished edition, check out university presses and well-regarded translators: a modern annotated translation will give you footnotes and an introduction that clarify historical references and Nietzsche's often biting style. Libraries, both local and through apps like Libby or OverDrive, are excellent for borrowing these newer translations without dropping cash. Personally, I like flipping between a clean translation and a scanned older edition—one feeds clarity, the other feeds atmosphere.

What Does God Is Dead Friedrich Nietzsche Say About Morality?

4 Answers2025-09-03 15:14:22

When Nietzsche declared that 'God is dead' in 'The Gay Science' and later explored the idea in 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra', I took it less as a theological taunt and more as a diagnosis about the grounding of morality. To me it meant that the Christian metaphysical foundation that had underpinned European moral systems for centuries was crumbling. Without that transcendent anchor, values that once seemed absolute start to wobble, and people face what Nietzsche called nihilism — the sense that life lacks inherent meaning.

I also see him pushing toward a radical re-evaluation. In 'On the Genealogy of Morality' he traces how what he calls 'slave morality'—values like humility, pity, and meekness—grew as a reaction against the assertive virtues of the powerful. Nietzsche doesn't simply cheer for domination; he's urging us to notice that moral systems are born from particular psychological and historical forces, not from cosmic edicts. For me this is liberating and scary at once: liberation, because it frees us to create values; scary, because it removes automatic moral certainties.

So when I read him, I feel pulled toward responsibility — the idea that we must become creators of meaning rather than passive receivers. He offers concepts like the will to power and the figure of the Übermensch as provocations: not blueprints, but reminders that a post-theistic age demands inventiveness in ethics. It leaves me thinking about what I actually value and why, more than handing me tidy rules.

Why Did God Is Dead Friedrich Nietzsche Shock 19th-Century Europe?

4 Answers2025-09-03 04:43:57

Honestly, the first time I stumbled across that line—'God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him.'—it felt like someone had thrown a brick through a stained-glass window. I was reading 'The Gay Science' late at night, and the bluntness hit harder than any gentle critique. In 19th-century Europe religion wasn't just private devotion; it was woven into law, education, community rituals, even the language people used to mark right from wrong.

What made Nietzsche's claim truly explosive was timing and tone. Europe was already simmering with new ideas: Darwin was rearranging creation myths, industrial changes tore at old social ties, and political revolutions had shown how fragile institutions could be. Nietzsche didn't offer a polite academic argument—he delivered a prophetic, almost theatrical diagnosis that implied an imminent moral vacuum. For clergy and many ordinary people that sounded like the end of meaning itself. Intellectuals felt betrayed or thrilled, depending on temperament, because the statement forced everyone to reckon with moral values that had been justified by divine authority for centuries.

I still love how it pushes you: if the old foundations crumble, what comes next? Reading Nietzsche often feels like standing at a crossroads—exciting, terrifying, and stubbornly honest.

What Misreadings Surround God Is Dead Friedrich Nietzsche Claim?

4 Answers2025-09-03 23:19:25

Frankly, the phrase 'God is dead' gets mangled more often than a meme caption, and that frustrates me in a warm, nerdy way. A huge misreading treats it as if Nietzsche proclaimed a literal obituary for a celestial being — like he figured out a cosmic cause of death. He wasn’t saying a supernatural entity had physically expired; he was diagnosing a cultural shift: the moral and metaphysical authority of Christianity was eroding in modern Europe. That context changes everything.

Another common slip is to hear triumphal atheism or moral nihilism. People assume Nietzsche is cheering: "Hooray, no more morality!" — but his tone is ambivalent. He saw the 'death' as dangerous because it leaves a value vacuum; he feared the rise of nihilism and urged a creative response — a revaluation of values. I keep pointing friends to 'The Gay Science' and 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra' because the poetic, aphoristic style matters; it’s diagnostic and provocative, not a system-builder. Also, beware of political misuses: later ideologues cherry-picked phrases to justify power games, which misses Nietzsche’s critique of herd mentality and his complicated talk about strength, will, and responsibility. For me, the phrase is an invitation to wrestle with meaning, not a victory lap or a battle cry, and that’s what keeps re-reading it rewarding.

Which Quotes From Beyond Good And Evil Friedrich Nietzsche Stand Out?

3 Answers2025-09-04 13:41:21

My head still buzzes when I pull lines from 'Beyond Good and Evil' off the shelf — Nietzsche has that knack for hitting you with a sentence that rearranges the furniture in your skull. One that always stops me cold is 'Supposing truth were a woman—what then?'. It's playful and provocative in the same breath, and it undercuts the whole macho, stone-carved notion of truth as something you bulldoze into place. Reading that, I get this image of truth as slippery, coy, demanding different questions than the blunt instruments of logic usually bring to the party.

Another chunk of his writing that I carry around is 'He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you.' I quote that to friends when they’re neck-deep in online pile-ons or when a story’s antihero starts doing the very thing they set out to stop. It’s a warning about motives, methods, and the cost of crusades — whether in politics, fandom spats, or personal vendettas.

I also often nod at the cold clarity of 'In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs it is the rule.' That line explains so much about trends I see on social media and in history books. These quotes feel less like ornament and more like tools, and I reach for them whenever I need a phrase that makes people pause and rethink. They leave me curious and slightly unsettled, which is exactly why I keep going back to the book.

Why Is Beyond Good And Evil Friedrich Nietzsche Important Today?

3 Answers2025-09-04 08:11:20

Wild thought: reading 'Beyond Good and Evil' felt like getting a jolt of cold water and a warm cup of tea at once. I devoured Nietzsche in fits and starts when I was younger, and this book keeps crawling back into my life because it refuses to let morality sit still. Its insistence on perspectivism—the idea that truths are tied to perspectives rather than absolute, monolithic laws—hits differently now, when everyone seems to curate an identity and swallow neat moral packages online. Nietzsche didn’t hand out a manual; he prods you to interrogate why you believe what you believe.

What really sticks with me is how practical his provocations can be. When I’m scrolling through newsfeeds or arguing in comment threads, I catch myself thinking in Nietzschean terms: Who benefits from this moral outrage? What historical habits underpin these judgments? That genealogical impulse—tracing values back to their roots—works like a mental hygiene check. It’s not permission to be callous; it’s an invitation to be honest about motives and power.

I also have to say: the book warns as much as it liberates. Misreading Nietzsche as endorsement of brute power is so easy, and that’s why context matters. I keep coming back to 'Beyond Good and Evil' not because it tells me what to do, but because it keeps me on my toes, asking uncomfortable questions and trying, imperfectly, to live with more integrity and creative responsibility.

What Criticisms Of Beyond Good And Evil Friedrich Nietzsche Exist?

3 Answers2025-09-04 18:02:33

Flipping through 'Beyond Good and Evil' always feels like sitting down with a friend who delights in poking at every comfortable idea you hold. I love that about it, but it's also the root of many critiques. A common line of attack is that Nietzsche is provocatively elitist: critics argue he seems to praise a kind of aristocratic, superior individual and denigrate egalitarian morals. That raises practical worries — if you trash popular moral systems without offering a workable replacement, you risk empowering cruelty or political reaction. Scholars point to his rhetorical celebration of the 'free spirits' and the 'noble' as language that can be (and historically was) twisted into dangerous social policies.

Another strand of criticism focuses on method and clarity. The aphoristic, poetic style that makes 'Beyond Good and Evil' so lively also makes it slippery. Philosophers from analytic traditions often gripe that Nietzsche doesn't produce a systematic argument: there are powerful insights and memorable lines, but also contradictions and sweeping claims about human nature, morality, and the 'will to power' that read as speculative rather than demonstrable. Feminist critics call out explicit misogynistic remarks and question how his critique of morality intersects with his attitudes toward women. And of course there's the long shadow of misappropriation — the misuse of Nietzsche's ideas by nationalist movements, which many say stems partly from his provocative phrasing and partly from later selective editing.

Despite all that, I find his book endlessly useful as a stimulant. Even if I agree with some criticisms — about lack of constructive alternatives or occasional rhetorical excess — the work pushes me to examine why I believe what I believe. If you read it critically, crediting its literary power while interrogating its presuppositions, it rewards you with more questions than tidy doctrines, and that, to me, is one of its enduring virtues.

How Did Beyond Good And Evil Friedrich Nietzsche Shape Thought Today?

3 Answers2025-09-04 02:20:56

Honestly, 'Beyond Good and Evil' feels like a little thunderbolt that keeps ricocheting through modern thought. When I first read excerpts in a college essay, I was struck by how Nietzsche refuses simple binaries — good vs evil, truth vs falsehood — and how that refusal shows up everywhere now: in literary theory, in the way journalists question 'objective' facts, even in how creators build morally gray characters in games and novels. His perspectivism quietly trained generations to ask who is telling the story and why, and that question is everywhere from film criticism to social media threads.

What I love is the ripple effect. Nietzsche's attack on herd morality didn't just spawn academic debates; it fed existentialists who asked us to make meaning, it nudged psychoanalysis toward the unconscious motives behind moral rules, and it handed later thinkers like Foucault and Deleuze tools to see institutions as power webs, not neutral structures. Of course, history is messy — his aphoristic style invited cherry-picking, and the darkest chapters of the 20th century twisted his ideas for ugly ends. But even that misuse forced deeper readings and corrections, which expanded how we talk about ethics, responsibility, and creativity.

So for me it's not just a book on a shelf. 'Beyond Good and Evil' feels like a voice in the background of so many conversations I have: when a friend questions a received norm, when a writer refuses easy moral resolutions, when a thinker argues truth is layered. It makes me distrust tidy answers and enjoy the work of thinking, which, to be honest, is kind of addicting.