The Historians

He drove there to annihilate the whole pack which had the audacity to combat against Him, The Dark Lord, but those innocent emerald eyes drugged his sanity and He ended up snatching her from the pack. Lyceon Villin Whitlock is known to be the lethal Dark walker, the Last Lycan from the royal bloodline and is considered to be mateless. Rumours have been circling around for years that He killed his own fated mate. The mate which every Lycan king is supposed to have only one in their life. Then what was his purpose to drag Allison into his destructive world? Are the rumours just rumours or is there something more? Allison Griffin was the only healer in the Midnight crescent pack which detested her existence for being human. Her aim was only to search her brother's whereabouts but then her life turned upside down after getting the news of her family being killed by the same monster who claimed her to be his and dragged her to his kingdom “The dark walkers”. To prevent another war from occurring, she had to give in to him. Her journey of witnessing the ominous, terrifying and destructive rollercoaster of their world started. What happens when she finds herself being the part of a famous prophecy along with Lyceon where the chaotic mysteries and secrets unravel about their families, origins and her true essence? Her real identity emerges and her hybrid powers start awakening, attracting the attention of the bloodthirsty enemies who want her now. Would Lyceon be able to protect her by all means when she becomes the solace of his dark life and the sole purpose of his identity? Not to forget, the ultimate key to make the prophecy happen. Was it her Mate or Fate?

9.5

120 챕터

The Swap

When my son was born, I noticed a small, round birthmark on his arm. But the weird thing? By the time I opened my eyes again after giving birth, it was gone. I figured maybe I'd imagined it. That is, until the baby shower. My brother-in-law's son, born the same day as mine, had the exact same birthmark. Clear as day. That's when it hit me. I didn't say a word, though. Not then. I waited. Eighteen years later, at my son's college acceptance party, my brother-in-law stood up and dropped the truth bomb: the "amazing" kid I'd raised was theirs. I just smiled and invited him and his wife to take their "rightful" seats at the table.

8 챕터

The Badass and The Villain

Quinn, a sweet, social and bubbly turned cold and became a badass. She changed to protect herself caused of the dark past experience with guys she once trusted. Evander will come into her life will become her greatest enemy, the villain of her life, but fate brought something for them, she fell for him but too late before she found out a devastating truth about him. What dirty secret of the villain is about to unfold? And how will it affect the badass?

평가가 충분하지 않습니다.

33 챕터

The Chosen One

Alex found himself entangled in a destiny, just when he was about to enjoy his teenage days. He reluctantly accepted to save his hometown from a calamity which had been happening for some years. He discovered some secrets in the course of saving his people from the calamity, to his surprise. How on earth is the people he regarded to be his biological parents for eighteen years not his? Will he eventually accept his destiny? Will he embrace his identity? Watch out as secrets unfold.

30 챕터

The Noble's Promise

"Jayden, your grandfather gave a promise to Queen Camellia, the mother of King Henry to protect their kingdom after the death of her King consort. And as you know about the backstabbing of Edward II. It seems like we are incompetent in fulfilling the promise of your grandfather. For protecting the throne of Orbloem and giving its actual Ruler back the only way possible is to have a relationship with the Bloemen Royal Family other than Frienship. As Rosaleigh is the crown princess of Orbloem and you're the heir apparent to Swedwish throne. I want you to marry Rosaleigh." Grandmama adjured. Without any further thoughts I stood to my feet and picked up the box from the mahogany table. "Your wish my command mormor." I smiled and bowed at her before leaving the library. Being Born to a royal family is not a cake walk. We're taught to abide by our elder's wish. And here it was about the promise my late grandfather made to Queen Camellia. Or'bloem is a comparatively small monarchy than Swedway. And the only way I see to regain and protect Orbloem's land is to marry Rosaleigh. I am a Royalty and fulfilling my grandfather's promise is my duty. I'll fulfill a NOBLE PROMISE. *** Jayden Alexander Krigston wants to marry Rosaleigh Isabelle Bloemen to fulfill his grandfather's promise. In that attempt he indeed falls in love with Rosaleigh. But as always fate has another plans.. How will Jayden being a NOBLE fulfill the PROMISE? Copyrights © 2020 by B_Iqbal

30 챕터

The Lycan’s Consort

“Consider it your blessed day, Fake fairy. Don't dare to cross my path ever again unless you stop loving your dear life.” His aqua-blue eyes pierced my soul, forcing me to stay still as his fierce voice churned my inside. He casted me a look of pure contempt before giving me the warning which screamed pure death. Pearl Addison, the human girl, landed in New York to find her college sweetheart cum fiance Jordan who vanished into the thin air, without being noticed. But on the very first day she crossed the path of Andreas Ronan Sinfield who was a powerful and mysterious Lycan king and the monarchical bloodline of the Seinfeld lineage which has been existing since medieval times. He developed strong revulsion toward her on their first meeting and first touch. Pearl was terrified of him to the core, seeing his monstrous behaviour and inhumane sight as He scared her with his half Lycan face without realising her human nature. Her six months stay in the foreign land tangled her into ominous experiences among feral beasts in the city and fate tossed her in the arms of Andreas who despised her for a reason unknown to her. But what about the alluring scent she emitted around him which should only come from his fated mate who died years ago? Consipiries, Betrayal, killings, lies, battles and Revenge took the shapes in between the unexpected love between two different souls. Would Pearl manage to slip from under his puissant wings when she happened to see his real identity or would He bind her to himself forever? After all He had some plans for her which she wouldn't be able to deny. As He, himself is the law in the city known by the name of the “Lethal Senator”.

7 챕터

What Did Ancient Historians Say About Hephaestion?

3 답변2025-10-18 09:48:09

Hephaestion, often recognized as one of the most significant figures in Alexander the Great's life, captivated various ancient historians. For starters, Arrian, one of the most reliable sources on Alexander's campaigns, depicted Hephaestion as more than just a companion; he painted him as Alexander's closest confidant and a quintessential representation of loyalty. Arrian even mentioned that the bond between the two was akin to that of Achilles and Patroclus, which illustrates how deeply interconnected their lives were. The respect Hephaestion earned was further emphasized by his role during battles, where his strategic brilliance often paralleled Alexander's own tactical genius.

Moreover, Plutarch's accounts shed light on Hephaestion's character, emphasizing his charm and intellect. He wasn't just a soldier; he was a cultured individual, one who could hold conversations about philosophy and arts, which made him valuable in various contexts beyond warfare. Plutarch also described the grief Alexander displayed after Hephaestion's untimely death, creating a poignant image of their relationship that resonated across the ages. This illustrates how the ancient world viewed him—not merely as a military leader but as a profoundly influential personal and strategic partner.

The way these historians portrayed Hephaestion underscores his complex role in Alexander's life and showcases how notable friendships could shape historical narratives. It's fascinating to think how the interconnections of personal relationships could influence such grand events in history, right?

Is Hidden Figures Based On A True Story According To Historians?

5 답변2025-10-14 17:38:29

I got pulled into the story of 'Hidden Figures' the moment I saw credits roll, and I’ve since dug into what historians say about it. Broadly speaking, yes — it's based on real people and real events. The film draws from Margot Lee Shetterly's book 'Hidden Figures', which is a well-researched account of Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan, and Mary Jackson and their roles at NACA/NASA. Historians generally applaud the movie for shining a light on these women who were long overlooked.

That said, historians also point out that the movie condenses timelines, simplifies institutional complexity, and dramatizes certain scenes for emotional impact. For example, some confrontational moments and the neat resolution of career obstacles are compressed or tweaked to fit a two-hour narrative. Important truths remain: these women made crucial technical contributions and faced racial and gender barriers. If you want the full picture, the book and NASA oral histories add texture and nuance that the film can’t fully capture. Personally, I love how the movie opens doors to the real history — it sent me straight to Shetterly's book and interviews, which deepened my appreciation even more.

Why Do Historians Criticize Alternate History Fanfiction Plots?

4 답변2025-08-29 19:08:14

Sometimes when I read alternate-history fanfiction on my commute I get that giddy feeling of 'what if'—but then I also bristle like a person who’s been taught to ask for sources. Historians tend to criticize these plots because they often skip the messy, structural stuff that actually shapes events. A story that flips one date or kills one leader and then expects everything else to stay the same ignores economies, social networks, institutional inertia, and long-term cultural change. That makes the divergence feel convenient, not plausible.

Beyond plausibility, there’s the way counterfactuals get handled. Historians like controlled thought experiments: you change one variable and trace the causal chain honestly. Fanfiction sometimes introduces a butterfly effect without exploring realistic constraints, or it imposes modern values onto past people—what scholars call presentism. And then there’s the ethical side: minimizing trauma or glossing over suffering for dramatic payoff can make the whole rewrite feel shallow. Still, I love when writers try; well-researched alternate histories can be brilliant gateways into real history, so when I see sloppy work I just wish they'd read a book or two more before posting.

Are There Good Books About American History Written By Historians?

5 답변2025-04-28 10:39:36

Absolutely, there are some incredible books on American history penned by historians that dive deep into the nation’s past. One standout is 'A People’s History of the United States' by Howard Zinn. It’s a game-changer because it flips the script, focusing on the voices often left out—workers, women, Native Americans, and enslaved people. Zinn doesn’t just recount events; he challenges the traditional narrative, making you rethink what you thought you knew.

Another gem is '1776' by David McCullough. It’s a gripping, almost cinematic account of the pivotal year in the American Revolution. McCullough’s storytelling is so vivid, you feel like you’re right there with Washington and his troops, enduring the freezing winter at Valley Forge. His attention to detail and ability to humanize historical figures make history feel alive, not just a series of dates and facts.

For a broader perspective, 'The Warmth of Other Suns' by Isabel Wilkerson is a must-read. It’s not just about history; it’s about the Great Migration, where millions of African Americans moved from the South to the North and West. Wilkerson weaves personal stories with historical context, making it both informative and deeply moving. These books aren’t just dry academic texts—they’re stories that resonate, challenge, and inspire.

Why Are The Canterbury Tales Helpful To Historians?

4 답변2025-10-30 04:34:17

The wealth of information packed into 'The Canterbury Tales' is simply astounding! It’s not just a collection of stories; it's a vivid snapshot of 14th-century life in England. The tales weave together a diverse group of characters, each representing different social classes, professions, and perspectives. This diversity serves as a rich tapestry that historians can unravel to understand the societal dynamics of the time.

For instance, Chaucer’s depiction of the Knight highlights the ideals of chivalry, while the Wife of Bath offers a candid view on gender roles and marriage. The various tales also reflect prevalent themes such as morality, social criticism, and religious commentary. By analyzing the characters and narratives, historians can extract insights into the values, conflicts, and everyday concerns of medieval society.

What makes this work even more valuable is Chaucer’s use of the vernacular. Written in Middle English, 'The Canterbury Tales' provides scholars with linguistic data that can be invaluable for understanding the evolution of the English language during that period. In short, these tales are like a time capsule, offering an immersive experience of the human condition across centuries. I often find that revisiting these stories allows me to appreciate not just the narrative craft, but the societal structures that influenced them.

How Does The Author Of The Canterbury Tales Aid Historians?

4 답변2025-10-30 20:48:12

Geoffrey Chaucer's 'The Canterbury Tales' serves as an incredible resource for historians because it offers a vibrant snapshot of 14th-century English society. Each tale represents a distinct voice, highlighting various social classes, professions, and personal backgrounds, from the noble knight to the plucky miller. By weaving these characters into a pilgrimage narrative, Chaucer lets readers glimpse daily life, societal norms, and the values of the time.

Historians can analyze the interactions between characters to understand class dynamics and conflicts, as well as the notion of pilgrimage itself as a significant cultural practice. The tales also reflect prevailing attitudes toward religion, morality, and gender roles, making it a multifaceted text that is rich in historical context.

Moreover, Chaucer's keen observations on the personalities and behaviors of his characters paint a picture of the zeitgeist—a mix of humor, criticism, and vivid characterization makes the text both entertaining and educational, which is what makes it a treasure trove for anyone studying this period in history.

Additionally, the language used—Middle English—provides insights into the evolution of the English language, offering linguists a glimpse into how speech and literature were transforming. Modern historians would acknowledge that Chaucer isn’t just telling stories; he’s also documenting an entire age, making his work invaluable to understanding our collective past.

Which Of The Following Historians Is Credited With Writing The First Modern History Book?

4 답변2025-06-10 02:50:14

As someone who spends a lot of time diving into historical texts, I've always been fascinated by the origins of modern historiography. The credit for writing the first modern history book usually goes to Leopold von Ranke, a 19th-century German historian. His work, 'Histories of the Latin and Germanic Nations from 1494 to 1514,' broke away from the traditional narrative style and introduced rigorous source criticism and an emphasis on objectivity. Ranke’s approach laid the foundation for how history is studied today, prioritizing primary documents and factual accuracy over grand, moralistic storytelling.

Before Ranke, many historical works were more like chronicles or moral lessons, but he transformed history into a scholarly discipline. His famous phrase, 'wie es eigentlich gewesen' (how it really was), encapsulates his commitment to truth. While others like Thucydides or Herodotus are often called the 'fathers of history,' Ranke’s methodological innovations make him the true pioneer of modern historical writing.

How Does The Historians End?

4 답변2025-11-26 19:29:35

I was completely swept away by the ending of 'The Historians'—it’s one of those books that lingers in your mind long after you’ve turned the last page. The story wraps up with a poignant reconciliation between the protagonist and their estranged mentor, set against the backdrop of a crumbling archive they’ve spent years trying to preserve. The symbolic fire that consumes the building feels like a metaphor for the cyclical nature of history itself—what’s lost and what’s remembered.

What really got me was the final scene, where the protagonist chooses to rewrite their own narrative instead of clinging to the past. It’s bittersweet but empowering, like watching someone step out of a shadow. The author leaves just enough ambiguity to make you wonder: Did they truly move on, or are they doomed to repeat the same patterns? That complexity is why I keep recommending this book to friends who love layered, character-driven stories.

How Do Historians Assess Catherine De Medici'S Leadership Today?

6 답변2025-10-22 18:09:46

I see a layered, almost operatic quality to how historians talk about Catherine de' Medici nowadays.

They used to paint her as either a monstrous schemer or a power-hungry witch — the culprits were obvious: sexism, propaganda from her enemies, and sensational stories around events like the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre. Modern historians have pushed back hard on those caricatures. I find it fascinating how scholarship now balances the grime of court politics with the very real administrative, diplomatic, and cultural work she did. Researchers highlight her use of marriage alliances, her patronage of the arts, and her bureaucratic tinkering to keep a fragile monarchy afloat.

Reading the newer takes, I get the sense that people are trying to be fair without whitewashing. They argue she was ruthlessly pragmatic at moments — sometimes cruel by our standards — but often acting within severe constraints: several weak heirs, religious civil war, and a male-dominated state apparatus. So I tend to come away seeing her as a survivor who shaped the Valois age in ways that mattered beyond the gossip, which is honestly kind of admirable.

How Do Historians Evaluate Plutarch S Lives For Accuracy?

9 답변2025-10-27 03:05:55

Picking up 'Parallel Lives' can feel like eavesdropping on a series of intimate confessions rather than reading a dry history book. I tend to start by asking what Plutarch wanted from his reader: he was writing character portraits aimed at moral teaching and comparison, so I never treat his anecdotes as courtroom evidence. Instead I read them as windows into how people in his era thought virtue and vice should look. That immediately sets the bar for accuracy — moralizing authors regularly reshape facts to make a point.

When I actually evaluate a claim, I triangulate. I check whether other ancient writers mention the same event, whether coins, inscriptions, or archaeological finds lend weight, and whether the internal timeline matches known dates. Plutarch often quotes speeches or gossip that modern historians flag as literary inventions; those can be illuminating psychologically but weak for literal truth. Manuscript tradition is another filter: editors compare variants in medieval copies and citations in later authors to reconstruct a more reliable text.

All this means I read Plutarch for character, anecdote, and reception history, and cross-check for factual certainty. He’s indispensable for getting the human color of the past, but I always keep one skeptical eyebrow raised — which, to me, makes history feel alive rather than flat.