Historians

Alphas Broken Mate
Alphas Broken Mate
** English is not my first language, and I know there is some grammar not being right. But I try my best.** Note to readers. ** this book/novel, contains sexual as well as abusive episodes.** Lina is a 17-year-old orphan living in a foster home, her life is what she think like living in hell. until she one day at school meet the new guy Alex. for some reason he calms her, make her feel things she thought she never had. Alex is 18 and the future Alpha from the Moon Stone Pack. he has been gone for 3 years for training and to learn. Alex is ready for his mate but hasn't found her yet. until he sees the quiet strange girl no one talks to. what will their story be? will he repair his broken mate? is she just a human? if not what exactly is she.
9
66 Bab
Timber Alpha
Timber Alpha
(Completed) Octavia Lennox has always looked forward to the adventure and freedom that her 18th birthday would bring. Finding a mate was never a priority, nor was discovering parts of herself that she refused to acknowledge. Being an Alpha's daughter, and then sister however, didn't come without responsibilities, and when she meets the Timber Alpha she has some choices to make. **This 4 book series is COMPLETE -- Reading order: 1-Timber Alpha Ch 1-86, 2-Mated to Brianna, 3-Mylo (Timber Alpha Ch 89-172), 4-Alpha Heirs
9.8
172 Bab
Pregnant And Rejected On Her Wedding Day
Pregnant And Rejected On Her Wedding Day
Kiara stood in front of the Altar, excited for the day she has waited all her life. Today, she'll officially become the wife of the guy that she had admired and loved all her life!. "Do you, Asher Huxley, accept Kiara Anderson, to be your lovely wedded wife and to love her till the last days of your life?". "I reject you, Kiara Anderson". His voice was cold and his red coloured eyes, piercing as he rejected Kiara in front of the Altar before he left , leaving everybody stunned. This was the day Kiara could never forget. This day was the day she needed her family's care and support the most, but they all turned their backs against her like she was a complete stranger. But what would Kiara do when she discovered she was pregnant for Asher Huxley? The guy who rejected her without a second thought. ……
8.1
192 Bab
Hatred With Benefits
Hatred With Benefits
Eva Carson has one enemy: Son of a rival family, Gorgeous, Cocky, borderline annoying, with a huge Ego– Emerson Ford. They never see eye to eye on things, and remain thorn in each other's flesh. After witnessing Emerson Ford fuck a girl through her window, while holding eye contact with her– something shifts between the two. When their overflowing enmity escalates into an unforgettable night of intense pleasure, Eva's hatred explodes into something else. Something with a teeming, uncontrollable sex drive. With the fued between the two families coupled with her somewhat hatred for him, Eva is unwilling to give in to her unwelcomed desires for Emerson, but when fate plays a cruel trick on them; how long before Eva breaks and finds herself in his bed?
9.9
96 Bab
Tattooed Luna
Tattooed Luna
*There are three books in one! Since they need to be read in order, they are one right after another! * With a genius IQ and her own tattoo shop, Kristen is about to become 18. After years of being abused by her stepmother, Kristen has decided to leave her pack with the money her tattoo shop has made. Regardless of who her mate is, Kristen will be on her own adventure. Unfortunately, more than one male has a problem with her independence. Kristen's fiery personality has placed her into a situation that is forcing her to face everything she has escaped. How much can one person endure before they give up?
9.4
615 Bab
Fake Marriage: The Trillionire Tycoon's Fiesty Bride
Fake Marriage: The Trillionire Tycoon's Fiesty Bride
Evangline Carter was prepared to getmarried to the man she loved her entire life, but suddenly, she discovered that her fiance's heart was captured by another woman who was no other than her stepsister. She was humiliated, face slapped, destroyed for loving a man who despised her. She was willing to sacrifice her youth, time, energy, love and heart for that man, but all her good intentions lead to pain and mystery.Trying to drown her sorrow with alcohol after her ruined wedding with her fiance who hooked up with her stepsister. Evangeline unexpectedly had a one night stand with a stranger who turned out to be the rich and powerful Damien Cross.Damien Cross, the king of the Business world, was a man to be feared. A man who was known as the devil as just the sound of his name made people tremble, cold, ruthless, heart of ice, merciless but extremely enticingly handsome.  There was not a single person in this world that dared to offend him. He had avoided many women who tried so hard to gain his attention. That was until his path unexpectedly collided with Evangeline."I need a wife." Damien declared and they both got a marriage license.After so many years of being in pain and heartache, it was now Evanglines turn to witness and experience a love grander than anyone.The smarter, feistier, witter and cunning Evangline who knew how to survive the cruel, backstabbing and harsh upper class society smiled.Challenges will arise, chaos will commence, and a lot of drama will ensue. But then again, what is a love story without interruption? The story of love without any drama is simply just a crush and the story of Eva and Damien was way different than just an ordinary relationship.
9.1
743 Bab

Which Best Historical Novel Is Recommended By Historians?

5 Jawaban2025-07-20 07:45:48

As someone who spends a lot of time delving into historical fiction, I've noticed historians often praise 'The Name of the Rose' by Umberto Eco. It's a masterpiece that blends medieval theology, philosophy, and mystery into a gripping narrative. Eco's meticulous research shines through, making it a favorite among scholars. Another frequently recommended book is 'Wolf Hall' by Hilary Mantel, which offers a vivid and nuanced portrayal of Thomas Cromwell and the Tudor court. Historians appreciate its depth and accuracy, as well as Mantel's ability to humanize historical figures.

For those interested in ancient history, 'I, Claudius' by Robert Graves is a classic that historians often cite for its rich detail and compelling storytelling. Graves' portrayal of the Roman Empire feels authentic and immersive. 'The Pillars of the Earth' by Ken Follett is another standout, praised for its detailed depiction of medieval architecture and society. These novels not only entertain but also educate, making them highly regarded by both historians and readers alike.

Which Historians Advised On The Latest Historical Movie?

4 Jawaban2025-08-29 08:10:54

Whenever a new historical movie pops up on my watchlist I get this itch to know who shaped its world — the folks behind the scenes who keep costumes, dialects, and tiny props honest. If you want to find the historians who advised the latest film, the fastest places I check are the end credits (look for titles like 'historical consultant', 'period advisor', 'cultural consultant', or 'military advisor') and the production company's press kit on their official site. Trade outlets like Variety or The Hollywood Reporter often name consultants in their set-visit pieces, and interviews with the director or head of production sometimes mention specific experts.

If those don’t turn anything up, IMDb has a technical and crew section where consultants are sometimes listed, and social media is gold — historians themselves often share their involvement on Twitter/X or LinkedIn. I’ve also emailed PR contacts from a film’s press page once and got a polite list of names, so don’t be shy to reach out if you need confirmation.

Why Is 'Europe: A History' Controversial Among Historians?

4 Jawaban2025-06-19 23:14:40

Norman Davies' 'Europe: A History' sparked debates because it challenges traditional Eurocentric narratives. Critics argue it glosses over key events like the Holocaust with startling brevity, while others praise its sweeping scope—covering everything from Celtic tribes to Soviet collapse. The book’s structure irks some academics; it mixes timelines and inserts quirky 'capsule' asides, which feel disruptive. Yet its ambition is undeniable. Davies sidelines Western Europe to spotlight Eastern contributions, a radical shift that ruffles feathers but enriches the discourse.

Some historians dismiss it as populist for favoring readability over rigor, cramming millennia into one volume. Others defend its accessibility, calling it a gateway for non-scholars. The controversy hinges on balance: Does simplifying complex histories serve enlightenment or erode accuracy? Davies’ provocative stance—like downplaying the Renaissance’s uniqueness—fuels fiery seminars. Love it or loathe it, the book forces conversations about whose stories dominate history.

Which History Book To Read Is Recommended By Historians?

3 Jawaban2025-08-17 06:26:34

I’ve always been fascinated by how history shapes our present, and one book that completely changed my perspective is 'Guns, Germs, and Steel' by Jared Diamond. It’s not just a dry recount of events; it digs deep into why some societies advanced faster than others. The way Diamond connects geography, biology, and culture is mind-blowing. I couldn’t put it down because it answers questions I didn’t even know I had. If you want a book that makes history feel alive and relevant, this is it. It’s like seeing the world through a historian’s eyes, but without the boring lectures.

How Did Edmund Ironside Die According To Historians?

3 Jawaban2025-08-25 00:24:43

Digging through medieval chronicles always feels like being a detective with half the clues smudged. Edmund Ironside died on 30 November 1016, but the how is where historians squabble. Contemporary sources note the date and that he was king briefly after fierce fighting with the Danish invader Cnut, and then—suddenly—he’s gone. Later Anglo-Norman writers, building on earlier annals, offer a more dramatic picture.

One long-standing medieval story, found in chronicles that followed the 'Anglo-Saxon Chronicle', claims Edmund was murdered—some versions say an assassin stabbed him while he was using a privy, a detail that has survived because it’s so lurid. William of Malmesbury and others repeat variations that hint at foul play possibly tied to political motivations (Cnut benefitted most from Edmund’s death). Modern historians treat this with caution: the latrine-murder story could be slander, a memorable rumor meant to paint Cnut or his supporters as treacherous.

So the bottom line I tend to tell friends is: the date is solid, the motive (political benefit for Cnut) is clear, but the cause isn’t certain. Some scholars prefer a view of natural causes or complications from earlier battle wounds. Others accept assassination as plausible. I like to picture the dusty court after the treaty and imagine how sudden deaths get wrapped in stories—sometimes fact, sometimes moral tale. If you’re into primary sources, leafing through 'Anglo-Saxon Chronicle' entries and later commentators is oddly addictive and shows how history and rumor braid together.

Why Do Historians Debate Inaccuracies In Historical Novels?

4 Jawaban2025-08-29 02:11:41

Sometimes while sitting on the subway with a dog-eared paperback I get pulled into a half-serious debate with strangers about whether an author 'cheated' history. For me it comes down to two things: responsibility and craft. Authors of historical fiction are artists first, but they borrow real lives and events. If an author radically alters motivations, erases groups, or invents atrocities that never happened, it shapes how readers — who may never touch a history textbook — understand entire eras.

That said, I adore novels like 'Wolf Hall' and 'Shōgun' for how they make the past breathe. Historians debate inaccuracies because their job is to test claims against sources, context, and methodology. A dramatized timeline or anachronistic detail might be harmless, but repeating myths (or stereotyping entire peoples) becomes a civic issue. Scholars point out these problems to protect nuance and to nudge writers toward better research, not to kill storytelling.

On train rides I keep a mental list of things I want authors to explain in afterward notes: which scenes are invented and why, what sources inspired them, and where readers can learn the complicated truth. That bridge between novel and history — if handled respectfully — is where my favorite reads live.

What Do Historians Say About Film Portrayals Of Kings?

4 Jawaban2025-08-29 02:27:52

Late-night channel surfing and reading dusty history paperbacks have made me suspicious of anything that looks too tidy on screen. When films tackle kings, historians usually wince first and then start explaining why: movies compress decades into two hours, invent conversations, and often turn complex succession disputes into clean moral stories. 'Braveheart' and 'The Last King of Scotland' get invoked all the time—one for heroic myth-making, the other for blending fact and fiction so skillfully that viewers forget to ask where the line was drawn.

What fascinates me is that historians don't always demand textbook fidelity; many care about whether a film captures broader truths about power, legitimacy, or cultural context. They'll critique costume accuracy, of course, and point out anachronistic dialogue, but they're also interested in how movies shape public memory. A bad-but-popular portrayal can overwrite years of academic nuance, and that matters when people use those images to understand their past.

So I end up watching these films like a double-feature: enjoying the craft while mentally fact-checking and jotting down books to read. When a movie sparks curiosity, historians see both a problem and an opportunity—misleading at times, but often a gateway for viewers to dig deeper into the messy, wonderful reality behind the crown.

What Are The Best History Reads Recommended By Historians?

5 Jawaban2025-05-28 05:00:04

As someone who spends a lot of time delving into historical narratives, I've come across a few books that stand out for their depth and accuracy. 'The Guns of August' by Barbara Tuchman is a masterpiece that captures the complexities of World War I with gripping detail. It’s not just about the battles but the personalities and decisions that shaped the conflict. Another favorite is 'A People’s History of the United States' by Howard Zinn, which offers a perspective often overlooked in mainstream history. For ancient history, 'SPQR' by Mary Beard is a brilliant exploration of Rome’s rise and fall, blending scholarship with accessibility.

If you’re into biographies, 'The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt' by Edmund Morris is a thrilling read about one of America’s most dynamic leaders. For something more global, 'The Silk Roads' by Peter Frankopan redefines world history by focusing on the East’s influence. These books aren’t just informative; they’re transformative, offering fresh lenses to view the past.

Why Is 'Fingerprints Of The Gods' Controversial Among Historians?

4 Jawaban2025-06-20 20:05:59

Graham Hancock's 'Fingerprints of the Gods' sparks fierce debate because it challenges mainstream archaeology with bold, unorthodox theories. The book argues that an advanced global civilization existed over 12,000 years ago, wiped out by a cataclysm, leaving traces in ancient monuments like the Sphinx and pyramids. Historians dismiss this as pseudoscience, citing lack of peer-reviewed evidence and reliance on speculative connections. Hancock’s interdisciplinary approach—blending myths, geology, and astronomy—feels refreshing but often strays into cherry-picked data.

Critics also condemn his dismissal of academic consensus as 'close-mindedness,' while fans praise his willingness to question dogma. The tension lies between imaginative storytelling and rigorous methodology—entertaining but divisive.

Who Burned Alexandria Library According To Historians?

3 Jawaban2025-07-26 03:04:36

As someone who loves digging into historical mysteries, the burning of the Library of Alexandria is a topic I find endlessly fascinating. Most historians point to Julius Caesar as the culprit during his siege of Alexandria in 48 BCE. His forces set fire to the harbor, and the flames spread to the library, destroying countless priceless scrolls. Some accounts suggest it wasn't intentional, but the damage was massive. Later, other events like conflicts in 272 CE and 391 CE may have caused additional losses. It's heartbreaking to think about all the ancient knowledge lost forever because of these fires.

Jelajahi dan baca novel bagus secara gratis
Akses gratis ke berbagai novel bagus di aplikasi GoodNovel. Unduh buku yang kamu suka dan baca di mana saja & kapan saja.
Baca buku gratis di Aplikasi
Pindai kode untuk membaca di Aplikasi
DMCA.com Protection Status