Library

Historians

A three year marriage was ended by infertility. When someone else became pregnant, she was forced out of the family without a single cent to her name…

9.3

690 Chapters

A Dangerous Atrophy

Rosaline died, and Sean personally put Jane into the women's prison for it. "Take good care of her"— his words made her three years in prison a living hell and even cost her a kidney. Before she went to prison, Jane said, "I didn't kill her," but Sean was unmoved. After her release from prison, she said, "I killed Rosaline, I'm guilty as sin!" Sean was livid as he said, "Shut up! I don't want to hear you say that!" Jane laughed. "Yes, I killed Rosaline Summers, and I did three years in prison for it." She escaped, and Sean scoured the whole world for her. Sean said, "I'll give you my kidney, Jane, if you'll give me your heart." But Jane looked up at Sean and said, "I don't love you anymore, Sean…"

9.1

656 Chapters

The Alpha's Tough Girl

Scott and Lisa Matthew's construction business is getting hit hard in the recession and this might be their last chance. Scott and Lisa decide it is time to start including werewolves as clients. But things change when it's the wolves pulling them in and not the money to save their business.--------------------------------BOOK 1&2 THE ALPHA'S TOUGH GIRL, BOOK 3- THE TRACKER'S SOULMATE, BOOK 4- THE ALPHA'S IMMORTAL TWINS.

9.7

50 Chapters

Revenge Of The Heir

"You're useless, so why would I be with you!…it's over, I'm getting married to someone else!" Arthur's wife said. — Everyone looks down on Arthur stark. His in-laws call him trash and useless, they consider him lower than their maids, treat him worse than they would treat an animal. But none of that mattered, all that mattered to Arthur Was his wife, and he was patiently waiting for his wife to hold his hand without being ashamed of him. Unfortunately for Arthur that day never came, as he one day discovered his wife was a cheat.

110 Chapters

Nerdy To Badass Werewolf

Book 1, 2 and 3 of Rejection Series. This book contains all three books combined；Skylar Maine was always bullied in her school for being a nerd. But she dealt with it. Always keeping her head down. Never fighting back. Now that her brothers are the new Betas they must all leave and visit the Ancient Wolves. Skylar couldn't be happier. After her Alpha Mate rejected her, she wanted nothing more than to leave. Heck, she didn't even want a mate from the start. Knowing the outcome already. But when she returns, will she be the same? Will she let people walk all over her again? Side note, this book is composed of all three of the Rejected Series books. Hope you enjoy!

9.3

95 Chapters

Mated in the Shadow of My Sister

James Anderson lost his future mate and luna, Stephanie, during a rogue attack. Stephanie's death left his entire pack in mourning; her death anniversary was even declared a pack holiday. Five years later, James discovers that Stephanie's younger sister Lily is his mate. But how can that be? Wasn't Stephanie supposed to be his mate? And would his pack even accept Lily as his mate and Luna—many have always blamed Lily for Stephanie's death, because Stephanie died trying to save Lily. For her part, Lily has lived in the shadow of her beautiful older sister for years. She knows very well that pack members and her parents wish that it was Lily that died that day instead of Stephanie. Lily had looked forward to the day that she would meet her mate and finally feel important to someone. Discovering that her mate is James is Lily's worst nightmare, especially when James reacts poorly to the discovery. Lily decides that she is unwilling to live in Stephanie's shadow any longer. She will not spend the rest of her life with a mate who wishes she was someone else. She rejects James, who all too quickly accepts the rejection. Soon afterwards, horrifying truths come out and James immediately regrets letting Lily go. He sets out to get Lily back and right the wrongs that have been done. But is it too late? Will Lily find love with James, or with someone else?

9.6

276 Chapters

What Did Ancient Historians Say About Hephaestion?

3 Answers2025-10-18 09:48:09

Hephaestion, often recognized as one of the most significant figures in Alexander the Great's life, captivated various ancient historians. For starters, Arrian, one of the most reliable sources on Alexander's campaigns, depicted Hephaestion as more than just a companion; he painted him as Alexander's closest confidant and a quintessential representation of loyalty. Arrian even mentioned that the bond between the two was akin to that of Achilles and Patroclus, which illustrates how deeply interconnected their lives were. The respect Hephaestion earned was further emphasized by his role during battles, where his strategic brilliance often paralleled Alexander's own tactical genius.

Moreover, Plutarch's accounts shed light on Hephaestion's character, emphasizing his charm and intellect. He wasn't just a soldier; he was a cultured individual, one who could hold conversations about philosophy and arts, which made him valuable in various contexts beyond warfare. Plutarch also described the grief Alexander displayed after Hephaestion's untimely death, creating a poignant image of their relationship that resonated across the ages. This illustrates how the ancient world viewed him—not merely as a military leader but as a profoundly influential personal and strategic partner.

The way these historians portrayed Hephaestion underscores his complex role in Alexander's life and showcases how notable friendships could shape historical narratives. It's fascinating to think how the interconnections of personal relationships could influence such grand events in history, right?

Is Hidden Figures Based On A True Story According To Historians?

5 Answers2025-10-14 17:38:29

I got pulled into the story of 'Hidden Figures' the moment I saw credits roll, and I’ve since dug into what historians say about it. Broadly speaking, yes — it's based on real people and real events. The film draws from Margot Lee Shetterly's book 'Hidden Figures', which is a well-researched account of Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan, and Mary Jackson and their roles at NACA/NASA. Historians generally applaud the movie for shining a light on these women who were long overlooked.

That said, historians also point out that the movie condenses timelines, simplifies institutional complexity, and dramatizes certain scenes for emotional impact. For example, some confrontational moments and the neat resolution of career obstacles are compressed or tweaked to fit a two-hour narrative. Important truths remain: these women made crucial technical contributions and faced racial and gender barriers. If you want the full picture, the book and NASA oral histories add texture and nuance that the film can’t fully capture. Personally, I love how the movie opens doors to the real history — it sent me straight to Shetterly's book and interviews, which deepened my appreciation even more.

Why Do Historians Criticize Alternate History Fanfiction Plots?

4 Answers2025-08-29 19:08:14

Sometimes when I read alternate-history fanfiction on my commute I get that giddy feeling of 'what if'—but then I also bristle like a person who’s been taught to ask for sources. Historians tend to criticize these plots because they often skip the messy, structural stuff that actually shapes events. A story that flips one date or kills one leader and then expects everything else to stay the same ignores economies, social networks, institutional inertia, and long-term cultural change. That makes the divergence feel convenient, not plausible.

Beyond plausibility, there’s the way counterfactuals get handled. Historians like controlled thought experiments: you change one variable and trace the causal chain honestly. Fanfiction sometimes introduces a butterfly effect without exploring realistic constraints, or it imposes modern values onto past people—what scholars call presentism. And then there’s the ethical side: minimizing trauma or glossing over suffering for dramatic payoff can make the whole rewrite feel shallow. Still, I love when writers try; well-researched alternate histories can be brilliant gateways into real history, so when I see sloppy work I just wish they'd read a book or two more before posting.

Are There Good Books About American History Written By Historians?

5 Answers2025-04-28 10:39:36

Absolutely, there are some incredible books on American history penned by historians that dive deep into the nation’s past. One standout is 'A People’s History of the United States' by Howard Zinn. It’s a game-changer because it flips the script, focusing on the voices often left out—workers, women, Native Americans, and enslaved people. Zinn doesn’t just recount events; he challenges the traditional narrative, making you rethink what you thought you knew.

Another gem is '1776' by David McCullough. It’s a gripping, almost cinematic account of the pivotal year in the American Revolution. McCullough’s storytelling is so vivid, you feel like you’re right there with Washington and his troops, enduring the freezing winter at Valley Forge. His attention to detail and ability to humanize historical figures make history feel alive, not just a series of dates and facts.

For a broader perspective, 'The Warmth of Other Suns' by Isabel Wilkerson is a must-read. It’s not just about history; it’s about the Great Migration, where millions of African Americans moved from the South to the North and West. Wilkerson weaves personal stories with historical context, making it both informative and deeply moving. These books aren’t just dry academic texts—they’re stories that resonate, challenge, and inspire.

Why Are The Canterbury Tales Helpful To Historians?

4 Answers2025-10-30 04:34:17

The wealth of information packed into 'The Canterbury Tales' is simply astounding! It’s not just a collection of stories; it's a vivid snapshot of 14th-century life in England. The tales weave together a diverse group of characters, each representing different social classes, professions, and perspectives. This diversity serves as a rich tapestry that historians can unravel to understand the societal dynamics of the time.

For instance, Chaucer’s depiction of the Knight highlights the ideals of chivalry, while the Wife of Bath offers a candid view on gender roles and marriage. The various tales also reflect prevalent themes such as morality, social criticism, and religious commentary. By analyzing the characters and narratives, historians can extract insights into the values, conflicts, and everyday concerns of medieval society.

What makes this work even more valuable is Chaucer’s use of the vernacular. Written in Middle English, 'The Canterbury Tales' provides scholars with linguistic data that can be invaluable for understanding the evolution of the English language during that period. In short, these tales are like a time capsule, offering an immersive experience of the human condition across centuries. I often find that revisiting these stories allows me to appreciate not just the narrative craft, but the societal structures that influenced them.

How Does The Author Of The Canterbury Tales Aid Historians?

4 Answers2025-10-30 20:48:12

Geoffrey Chaucer's 'The Canterbury Tales' serves as an incredible resource for historians because it offers a vibrant snapshot of 14th-century English society. Each tale represents a distinct voice, highlighting various social classes, professions, and personal backgrounds, from the noble knight to the plucky miller. By weaving these characters into a pilgrimage narrative, Chaucer lets readers glimpse daily life, societal norms, and the values of the time.

Historians can analyze the interactions between characters to understand class dynamics and conflicts, as well as the notion of pilgrimage itself as a significant cultural practice. The tales also reflect prevailing attitudes toward religion, morality, and gender roles, making it a multifaceted text that is rich in historical context.

Moreover, Chaucer's keen observations on the personalities and behaviors of his characters paint a picture of the zeitgeist—a mix of humor, criticism, and vivid characterization makes the text both entertaining and educational, which is what makes it a treasure trove for anyone studying this period in history.

Additionally, the language used—Middle English—provides insights into the evolution of the English language, offering linguists a glimpse into how speech and literature were transforming. Modern historians would acknowledge that Chaucer isn’t just telling stories; he’s also documenting an entire age, making his work invaluable to understanding our collective past.

Which Of The Following Historians Is Credited With Writing The First Modern History Book?

4 Answers2025-06-10 02:50:14

As someone who spends a lot of time diving into historical texts, I've always been fascinated by the origins of modern historiography. The credit for writing the first modern history book usually goes to Leopold von Ranke, a 19th-century German historian. His work, 'Histories of the Latin and Germanic Nations from 1494 to 1514,' broke away from the traditional narrative style and introduced rigorous source criticism and an emphasis on objectivity. Ranke’s approach laid the foundation for how history is studied today, prioritizing primary documents and factual accuracy over grand, moralistic storytelling.

Before Ranke, many historical works were more like chronicles or moral lessons, but he transformed history into a scholarly discipline. His famous phrase, 'wie es eigentlich gewesen' (how it really was), encapsulates his commitment to truth. While others like Thucydides or Herodotus are often called the 'fathers of history,' Ranke’s methodological innovations make him the true pioneer of modern historical writing.

How Does The Historians End?

4 Answers2025-11-26 19:29:35

I was completely swept away by the ending of 'The Historians'—it’s one of those books that lingers in your mind long after you’ve turned the last page. The story wraps up with a poignant reconciliation between the protagonist and their estranged mentor, set against the backdrop of a crumbling archive they’ve spent years trying to preserve. The symbolic fire that consumes the building feels like a metaphor for the cyclical nature of history itself—what’s lost and what’s remembered.

What really got me was the final scene, where the protagonist chooses to rewrite their own narrative instead of clinging to the past. It’s bittersweet but empowering, like watching someone step out of a shadow. The author leaves just enough ambiguity to make you wonder: Did they truly move on, or are they doomed to repeat the same patterns? That complexity is why I keep recommending this book to friends who love layered, character-driven stories.

How Do Historians Assess Catherine De Medici'S Leadership Today?

6 Answers2025-10-22 18:09:46

I see a layered, almost operatic quality to how historians talk about Catherine de' Medici nowadays.

They used to paint her as either a monstrous schemer or a power-hungry witch — the culprits were obvious: sexism, propaganda from her enemies, and sensational stories around events like the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre. Modern historians have pushed back hard on those caricatures. I find it fascinating how scholarship now balances the grime of court politics with the very real administrative, diplomatic, and cultural work she did. Researchers highlight her use of marriage alliances, her patronage of the arts, and her bureaucratic tinkering to keep a fragile monarchy afloat.

Reading the newer takes, I get the sense that people are trying to be fair without whitewashing. They argue she was ruthlessly pragmatic at moments — sometimes cruel by our standards — but often acting within severe constraints: several weak heirs, religious civil war, and a male-dominated state apparatus. So I tend to come away seeing her as a survivor who shaped the Valois age in ways that mattered beyond the gossip, which is honestly kind of admirable.

How Do Historians Evaluate Plutarch S Lives For Accuracy?

9 Answers2025-10-27 03:05:55

Picking up 'Parallel Lives' can feel like eavesdropping on a series of intimate confessions rather than reading a dry history book. I tend to start by asking what Plutarch wanted from his reader: he was writing character portraits aimed at moral teaching and comparison, so I never treat his anecdotes as courtroom evidence. Instead I read them as windows into how people in his era thought virtue and vice should look. That immediately sets the bar for accuracy — moralizing authors regularly reshape facts to make a point.

When I actually evaluate a claim, I triangulate. I check whether other ancient writers mention the same event, whether coins, inscriptions, or archaeological finds lend weight, and whether the internal timeline matches known dates. Plutarch often quotes speeches or gossip that modern historians flag as literary inventions; those can be illuminating psychologically but weak for literal truth. Manuscript tradition is another filter: editors compare variants in medieval copies and citations in later authors to reconstruct a more reliable text.

All this means I read Plutarch for character, anecdote, and reception history, and cross-check for factual certainty. He’s indispensable for getting the human color of the past, but I always keep one skeptical eyebrow raised — which, to me, makes history feel alive rather than flat.