Does 'The Mercies' Have A Sequel Or Follow-Up Novel?

The historical setting of 'The Mercies' is chillingly real—it's based on the 1621 Vardø witch trials in Norway. Kiran Millwood Hargrave drops us into this frozen fishing village after a storm wipes out nearly all the men. The women left behind struggle to survive in a society that views their independence as suspicious. When a fanatical commissioner arrives, whispers of witchcraft spread like wildfire. The novel captures the oppressive atmosphere of 17th-century Scandinavia, where superstition and religious zealotry could turn neighbors into accusers overnight. The stark landscape mirrors the characters' isolation, making every decision feel life-or-death. It's historical fiction with teeth, showing how quickly fear can destroy a community.

I recently hunted down 'The Mercies' myself and found Book Depository to be the most reliable option for international shipping. They offer free delivery worldwide, which is rare, and their packaging keeps books pristine. Amazon also ships internationally, but their rates vary wildly by country. For those in Europe, Blackwell's has competitive shipping prices and often gets books to you faster than expected. Waterstones can be hit or miss with international orders, but they sometimes have exclusive editions worth the extra wait. If you prefer supporting indie bookstores, Powell's Books in Portland offers international shipping, though it's pricier than the big retailers.

Okay, diving straight in — my take on how 'Little Mercies' wraps up leans into the small, human reckonings more than a tidy plot bow. The climax peels back the layers of secrecy and denial that have been building, so you finally get the truth that’s been hovering under every scene. It’s not an explosive, everything-is-solved finale; rather, the final chapters trade big plot fireworks for quieter moral accounting. People are forced to own the consequences of choices that once seemed forgivable, and the story rewards honesty in surprising, modest ways. What really lingered with me was the note of imperfect reconciliation. Some relationships start to mend, but not all wounds close. The author leaves room for doubt and future repair, which felt honest — like someone handing you a bandage and a list of things still to fix. I finished feeling both comforted and a bit unsettled, which, for me, is the hallmark of a book that trusts its readers.

I just finished 'The Mercies' and was blown away by how grounded it felt. Turns out, it's heavily inspired by real historical events. The novel is set in 1617 Norway after an actual storm killed nearly all the men in a fishing village, leaving the women to survive alone. What makes it chilling is the witch trials that follow—these actually happened in Vardø, where dozens of women were burned as witches. The author Kiran Millwood Hargrave took these brutal facts and wove them into a gripping narrative about resilience and persecution. The details about Sami culture and the oppressive lens of Christianity are painfully accurate too. If you want more historical fiction with this level of research, try 'The Witches of New York' by Ami McKay.

The main female characters in 'The Mercies' are some of the most compelling women I've read about in historical fiction. Margret stands out as the young widow who loses her husband in the tragic 1617 Vardo storm that wipes out most of the local fishermen. Her grief is raw but she transforms into this quiet strength, learning to survive in a world that gives women no power. Then there's Ursa, the commissioner's wife who arrives from Bergen with her own burdens. Watching her awkward attempts at fitting into this harsh environment while secretly being drawn to Margret creates this electric tension. The character of Maren deserves special mention too - she's this fierce outsider who challenges the status quo, becoming both a beacon of hope and a target for suspicion in the witch hunt madness that engulfs the village.

The novel 'Little Mercies' pulled me in with a quiet, raw energy that hides a lot of moral complexity beneath its small-town surface. It follows a woman who has lived with a private grief for years — a motherhood that never went the way she expected — and who, when faced with another fragile child in crisis, makes a desperate, human choice that sets off ripples through the community. The plot moves between the immediate fallout of that decision and the slow unspooling of why she acted the way she did: secrets from the past, judgement from neighbors, and the steady, awkward work of trying to make a safe life with limited options. There’s an investigation thread — less a procedural and more a human portrait of people trying to do right under pressure — and the climax forces characters into reckonings where mercy and punishment feel dangerously close. What I loved most was how the novel treats compassion as something complicated, not neat. It doesn’t hand out easy resolutions; instead it asks, repeatedly, what kindness looks like when you’re terrified and cornered, and whether forgiveness can ever really erase certain choices.

The Mercies' dives into witchcraft accusations with brutal realism, showing how fear and superstition can turn neighbors into enemies. Set in 17th-century Norway after a storm wipes out most male villagers, the remaining women start rebuilding their lives—until a commissioner arrives, suspicious of their independence. The novel mirrors historical witch trials, where women who healed or spoke their minds became targets. What chills me is how easily suspicion spreads: a herbal remedy here, a muttered prayer there, and suddenly you're a devil's accomplice. The author doesn't romanticize; she shows accusations as tools of control, stripping women of power under the guise of righteousness. The protagonist's fate hinges not on evidence but on who holds authority to define 'witch.'

Honestly, 'Little Mercies' stuck with me in this quiet, sideways way that makes certain lines curl under your skin — and I love sharing the ones that have lived with me. I’m not going to paste big chunks of the text, but I’ll walk through the moments and paraphrased lines that hit hardest, and why each one feels like a small shard of the book’s moral weather. If you’ve read it, you’ll nod; if you haven’t, I hope these glimpses make you want to pick it up and sit with the quiet tension for a while. One line that keeps coming back to me is the narrator’s weary clarity about choices and consequences — the idea that good intentions don’t erase harm and that people act out of a mix of love, fear, and tiredness. It plays out in a few tight, quiet sentences where responsibility is weighed like a ledger you can’t close. Another is an almost domestic confession about holding someone when everything else is collapsing — a line that captures how small physical comforts can be urgent, necessary mercies. There’s also a blunt observation about how silence can be its own kind of violence, and that failing to speak up sometimes hurts as much as the wrong words. Each of these moments reads less like a flourish and more like someone setting down a heavy truth in the room. I also loved the book’s quieter, kinder flashes: a thought about forgiveness that refuses the grand gestures and instead insists on daily, imperfect acts; a sequence where a memory of childhood innocence is sharpened into both nostalgia and regret; and a spare reflection on motherhood that balanced awe with exhaustion without making either emotion sentimental. The phrasing in these bits is lean — nothing ornate — but it’s precise, which gives the emotion a real gravity. The way the narrator notes small domestic details (the hum of a fridge, the way a jacket is folded) turns ordinary life into tiny anchors that keep the novel from drifting into melodrama. What I keep telling friends after finishing 'Little Mercies' is that the book’s power isn’t in big revelations but in how it holds the small, uncomfortable truths up to the light. The lines that stood out are the ones that don’t try to fix everything; they ask you to notice. If you like stories that treat compassion as complicated and not always tidy, those passages will feel like a quiet companion. I’d recommend carrying a pencil when you read it — you’ll want to underline the things that quietly sting — and maybe be prepared to sit with the book for a bit after you close it, letting those small mercies and regrets settle. If you want, tell me which lines hit you hardest when you finish — I’d love to trade notes.