4 Answers2025-11-11
Aedan’s story in ‘Dawn of Wonder’ follows the young man after his home has been destroyed by slavers. Rage and cunning get him into the famous academy, where he is pushed to his limits in the most intense training scenes. However, it are the quiet moments between these scenes that show most growth, like his strange bond with a stray dog, and his complicated views on authority. The looming figure of the Fury is, of course, the biggest threat, but Renshaw has written all his characters up so well in dialogue that even the smallest of them are memorable. This is a big book, but every chapter was so needed.
8 Answers2025-11-03
My friend said it was kind of like “The Thing” meets “Tron” – a small group of people are stuck in a data fortress in the Arctic and the Error is this shape-shifting digital entity that can imitate and corrupt any person or system. So, a really closed-in, don’t-trust-everyone kind of story.
Rather than trying to understand the Error, you read about a small group of people who are gradually having to struggle to survive as the Error learns to use their environment against them in a series of climactic and increasingly intense events. It’s a totally tense read, with no easy solutions at the end. Just the depature [sic] stark reality of their eventual survival at what cost.
4 Answers2025-06-27
'Wonder' shows the absence of empathy at first and then the gradual growth of it through a series of small positive moments with Jack, Summer and others, including Miranda’s belated apology. The book is good because it shows kindness is not always rewarded but is worth it. Auggie’s family is good too, in that their love for each other is not perfect. His dad’s jokes hide his fear and his mum’s over-protectiveness is smothering at times, but they both love him relentlessly. The book shows that empathy is not always pretty but it is necessary.
7 Answers2025-12-24
Am I talking about the book with the twist about the narrator? If so, it’s best to go into it blind, as any summary of the book would give away about 70% of the book’s power. The set-up for the book is fairly mundane (a crime, an investigation) but the execution of the book is incredibly good. The book is told from the perspectives that the author chooses and at first the prose is very dry and observational. However, as the book continues on, the prose becomes more and more fevered and fragmented. I wouldn’t want to commit a crime to tell you more about this book, but if you like stories that play with point-of-view and try to trick the reader, then this is the kind of book that you’ll want to read.
One of the plot points is the plot against the reader's assumptions.
9 Answers2025-08-25
Hah, I saw it coming. The main character was the CEO of his own evil empire and had been working 24/7 to maintain it, fighting fires and backstabbing people left and right. He obviously reached a point where he couldn’t take it anymore and retired to a rural setting with a low stress of living, where he can grow his own vegetables in the sun. The “villainy” of the main character was just a metaphor for the cutthroat world of business and the main character’s achievements were not about being evil, but about being able to achieve the ultimate work-life balance and retire to a cabin in the woods, fucking off and spending his days doing whatever he wants. That’s the most relatable happy ending to fiction that I’ve ever read. No emails, no meetings, no office politics. Just him, out in the sun, growing his own vegetables.
6 Answers2025-06-29
This is a great supplementary textbook, it is highly recommended for generating interest and giving students a narrative account of ancient myths. However, as with any primary source, it should not be substituted for students’ reading of said source, as well as other neutral summaries and accounts of the myths. A student could easily come away with the Fry version of a particular myth, and as a result it would be best to use this textbook outside of the classroom as supplementary reading for self-study or purely for pleasure. The writer successfully portrays the glorious human flaws of the ancient gods and heroes and helps readers feel that they have encountered each of the main characters in the book, thereby coming away with a far better understanding than they would have received from a list of all of the ‘facts’ about the myths of ancient peoples. In the long run such a ‘taking on board’ of these stories in this way will no doubt prove to be far more valuable than the correction of simple facts for the continuation of the stories of these long-dead cultures.
11 Answers2025-12-17
I am a sucker for superior beings falling to incredibly human weaknesses. Newton, an alien from a superior civilization, isn’t defeated by a wondrous army of scientists, nor by curious box after curious box. In the end, it was just whiskey, TV, loneliness, and the petty greed of his employees that brought him down. His advanced mind simply couldn’t grasp (and thus protect against) the nasty, banal evils of the human condition. A checklist of human vices, applied to a previously untouched soul, one by one. The ways in which he tries to utilize human systems and ends up being twisted to serve against his goals are endlessly, wickedly clever. How he’s searching for companionship, only to be thrown aside, or not even to recognize the love and help that’s right in front of him. How, in seeking relief from pain, he becomes instead an addict, lost. It’s a systematically brilliant deconstruction of an alien. A simple plot summary, but immense power in the execution, a steady, unrelenting trickle of compromises and decays. It’s one of the most humanly written stories about an alien ever. And so very, very inhuman about us.
11 Answers2026-06-03
There are some VERY nasty villains in this book. William Hamleigh is so detestable I dislike him intensely, though he is probably not a totally historically accurate and nuanced villain. A totally historically accurate and nuanced villain might be slightly more realistic, but I doubt I would be as indignant at the plight of the serfs if I were reading a historically accurate novel of life in the 12th century. As it is, I am able to feel the outrage of Follett’s corrupt lord, his evil bishop, and his cunning spy, because I care about the sufferers under their oppression. The historical accuracy of the novel lies not in the psychologically realistic portrayal of the oppressors, but in the emotional truth of their oppressive regime.
5 Answers2025-12-05
There’s a lot of novels that make you check over your shoulder while reading ‘The Burrow’ is one of them. Four friends dared each other to map out their cave, or burrow, and the next night the layout had changed. What follows is the struggle of the four friends to maintain trust as they try to work out whether they’re just being paranoid or whether something supernatural is going on. The dialogue between the teenagers is particularly great as they argue between logic and fear. One of the most surprising moments for me was when a character suddenly disappeared mid-sentence, and the others frantically try to explain away what’s just happened. The ending is left somewhat open to interpretation, but just gives you enough to keep speculating long after you’ve finished reading the book.
8 Answers2026-01-13
I previously mentioned that the inaccuracy in this book was minimal but very strategic. Levin names real places, such as Asunción, as well as real people, like José Mengele and the Auschwitz experiments. With such a small amount of prior knowledge of WWII history, most readers will know these references. Hence, they will grant Levin’s rather outlandish tale of cloning a certain amount of credibility. Indeed, most historical fiction uses a large amount of prior knowledge and actually makes something up whereas Levin does the reverse: he uses the historical fiction to describe the rather outlandish yet quite evil cloning going on. So the historical inaccuracy in this book is minimal but very effective for the speculative genre in which it is written.