What Is The Chronological Order Of All Sherlock Holmes Stories?

Reading Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's entire canon and getting lost—is there a definitive timeline for the cases of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson from 'A Study in Scarlet' onward?
2026-07-30 07:08:53
59
共有
ABO属性診断
あなたはAlpha?Beta?それともOmega? いくつかの質問に答えて、あなたの本当の属性をチェックしましょう。
あなたの香り
性格タイプ
理想の恋愛スタイル
隠れた願望
ダークサイド
診断スタート

5 回答

GavinShaw
GavinShaw
Story Finder Translator
The Christopher Morley/Baker Street Irregulars organization has published many papers on chronology. This isn't just internet chatter; it's a long-standing literary society's hobby. Their journals are filled with serious, witty debates on the subject. If you want to go to the source, look up writings by the Baker Street Irregulars. This is where the term 'Sherlockian' scholarship was born. They treat the canon as real history to be analyzed.
2026-07-31 07:59:13
3
Otter
Otter
Bibliophile Electrician
The best resource I've found online is the Wikipedia page 'Sherlock Holmes bibliography.' It has tables listing both publication order and several proposed chronological orders side-by-side. You can see where scholars like Baring-Gould, Klinger, and others disagree. It's a fantastic starting point without buying a bunch of annotated books. Just seeing the different lists shows you how ambiguous the clues are. One story's date hinges on whether Watson meant a Monday or a Tuesday based on a historical calendar! It's that level of nitpicky, which is honestly glorious.
2026-08-01 09:59:19
2
EdenStone
EdenStone
Frequent Answerer Editor
The beauty of short stories is you don't need an order. Feel like a gothic horror? Read 'Hound of the Baskervilles.' Feel like a locked-room mystery? 'The Speckled Band.' Feel like a character study? 'The Greek Interpreter.' Treat the canon like a box of chocolates. The lack of a required sequence is a feature, not a bug. It's why they've remained so popular for so long—you can pick them up anytime.
2026-08-03 03:11:18
1
TrueDesk
TrueDesk
Insight Sharer Student
I think the inconsistencies are the point. Watson is telling us these stories years after the fact, from notes and memory. Of course he'd get dates and details mixed up! The 'chronological order' project is an attempt to correct Watson's memoirs, which is a very Holmesian thing to do—imposing order on chaotic data. But in doing so, we might lose Watson's voice, which is warm and human and flawed. I'd rather have Watson's messy, vibrant recollections than a sterile, perfect timeline.
2026-08-04 07:44:23
4
BrightSun
BrightSun
Sharp Observer Worker
The chronological puzzle is a big reason the fandom has lasted so long. It gives people something to do beyond just reading. They can research, debate, write papers. It turns passive consumption into active scholarship. In that sense, the lack of a clear order is a gift from Doyle. He created a world so rich and detailed that fans feel compelled to organize it, even though it resists organization. The ambiguity is the engine of enduring engagement.
2026-08-05 15:19:21
5
すべての回答を見る
コードをスキャンしてアプリをダウンロード

関連書籍

関連質問

What is the reading order for Sherlock Holmes stories?

3 回答2026-07-23 18:33:56
I basically got into Holmes as a complete mess – found 'The Hound of the Baskervilles' first because it was a standalone movie, then stumbled into 'A Study in Scarlet'. If you're aiming for a proper experience, publication order is the move. Start with the novels: 'A Study in Scarlet' introduces Watson and Holmes meeting, 'The Sign of the Four' comes next, then you can jump into the short stories. The first two short story collections, 'The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes' and 'The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes', are where the character really hits his stride. After that, 'The Hound' is a novel again, then the later collections like 'The Return' and 'His Last Bow'. The publication order isn't just chronological; you see Conan Doyle's writing evolve, and the little references between stories actually land. Skipping around ruins some of the callbacks, like the mention of the 'Giant Rat of Sumatra' you only get if you've read the earlier ones. Honestly, 'The Case-Book' can feel a bit uneven, but it's worth it for a few gems. The whole thing is a slow build of their friendship, which gets dismantled if you read out of order.

How does the chronological order of Sherlock Holmes differ from publication?

8 回答2026-07-30 09:33:27
For audiobooks, this gets tricky. Some compilations are in publication order, some are chronological, some are just randomized. If you're listening, maybe check the table of contents. Stephen Fry's introductions often touch on these ordering quirks, which is helpful.

How do the Sherlock Holmes stories read in in-universe timeline order?

6 回答2026-07-30 14:03:48
Just lurkin'. This thread is giving me ideas for my next deep dive.

In what chronological order should a new reader start Sherlock Holmes?

3 回答2026-07-30 09:58:21
What's with the pressure to find the 'correct' order? It's literature, not IKEA furniture. The stories have survived over a century because they're robust. They can be read out of sequence, adapted, parodied, and reimagined. Your personal journey through them is what matters. Forge your own path. Your favorite story might be some obscure one you find by accident.

How do the Sherlock Holmes stories rank by original publication order?

7 回答2026-07-19 06:14:41
The ultimate test: try to explain the publication order to a friend without their eyes glazing over. If you can make it exciting—'It's a saga of death, resurrection, and monkey glands!'—you've won. The order is a story in itself, a meta-narrative about an author and his creation. That's what makes it worth exploring, beyond just a checklist of titles.

What is the reading order for Sherlock Holmes 1 stories?

3 回答2026-07-23 22:44:51
so I'm firmly in the 'publication order' camp for first-time readers. Start with 'A Study in Scarlet.' It's the very first one, where Watson and Holmes meet, and you get that perfect introduction to 221B Baker Street. It just feels right to experience the stories as the original audience did, watching the characters and their world develop over time. Skipping around can ruin some of the continuity, like Watson's shoulder wound moving around or the fact he gets married. That said, if someone finds 'The Hound of the Baskervilles' more appealing and it gets them hooked, that's fine too. But for the full, classic experience, publication order is the way to go. I'm rereading them that way now, and it's a different pleasure than just picking a favorite case at random.
無料で面白い小説を探して読んでみましょう
GoodNovel アプリで人気小説に無料で!お好きな本をダウンロードして、いつでもどこでも読みましょう!
アプリで無料で本を読む
コードをスキャンしてアプリで読む
DMCA.com Protection Status