8 답변
I tend to be blunt: canon status hinges on source priority. When Edgar's pursuit is shown in the main narrative—consistent actions, consequences, and other characters reacting to it—I mark it as canon. If it's only in extras, adaptations, or interview comments, I treat it as semi-canon or authorial flavor.
In short, parts of the pursuit that appear on-page in the primary text carry the most weight for me; the rest is charming garnish. Personally, those canon moments make me root for him, even if some scenes feel more like fanservice than structural development.
Honestly, I'm a softie for the romance side of things, so I tend to give Edgar the benefit of the doubt. When his pursuit appears repeatedly across different parts of the original work—small scenes, implied decisions, and other characters acknowledging it—I read all that as canon. Even if some of the more melodramatic moments come from spin-offs or author essays, they feel like natural extensions rather than contradictions.
I also think that what feels true emotionally can matter: if the text consistently frames Edgar as someone who won't give up, that trait becomes part of the character regardless of whether every dramatic declaration is printed in the main chapter list. For me, that relentless devotion is one of the reasons I keep rooting for him, and I'll happily call it canon in the sense that it defines who he is.
Looking at Edgar's pursuit from a skeptical, almost editorial angle, I separate two things: narrative fact and tonal emphasis. Narrative facts are on-page events that alter plot or character arcs—these are canon in the strictest sense. Tonal emphasis, like how romantic or obsessive he appears, often changes with each adaptation, director, or translator.
I also consider authorial commentary differently: a tweet or interview can confirm intent, but it doesn't retroactively create new events in the story. So when a side novel or OVAs dramatize Edgar's relentless chase more dramatically than the books, that increases its cultural visibility but not necessarily its canonical weight. Personally, I accept the chase as canon where it impacts the storyline directly; otherwise I enjoy the extras as delightful embellishments that deepen my appreciation of him.
My heart always does a little flip when people argue about canon versus headcanon, and Edgar's case is a textbook example. If you're the kind of person who treats only the original serialization as true, then you'd look for concrete, on-page actions where Edgar persistently chases after his love interest. Those moments matter more than lines in a later interview or a whimsically written bonus chapter.
On the flip side, if you accept author notes, drama CDs, or companion novels as part of the universe, then the pursuit becomes undeniably canon — or at least officially supported. I personally listen to the text first, then let side materials color in the background. What I love is how fans debate this: some see Edgar as a tragic romantic, others as a comic heel. Either way, the documented scenes in the main work tip me toward calling his pursuit canon, albeit with variations across media.
I’ll be blunt: no, it’s not canon in the traditional, textually backed way. What it is, though, is a cultural artifact that many of us treat like canon in our heads. Stories like 'Edgar's Relentless Pursue for The Love of His Life' often arise because they explore emotional truth the original didn’t, and that gives them power. Even without formal recognition, scenes from it get quoted, fan art gets made, and small nods from creators can make the piece feel semi-official.
For me, canon matters for continuity and official lore, but emotional canon — what makes you cry or ship hard — is a separate, valid thing. I keep the official timeline for facts, and I keep this story in a special folder in my heart. It enriches the characters, and honestly, I’m glad it exists; it’s one of those fan works that quietly reshapes how a whole community sees a relationship.
Short version: probably not canon in the strict sense, though it has an unusually strong quasi-official aura. I’ve followed how communities and creators blur the edges of continuity, and this piece fits a familiar pattern — fan-created or derivative work that gained traction and received light nods from people involved with the original property.
Looking into indicators I use to judge canonicity — official publications, in-universe references later adopted by the franchise, statements from the original author, and licensing — 'Edgar's Relentless Pursue for The Love of His Life' meets at most one or two. There was a promotional blurb that referenced a minor event similar to a scene in that story, and an artist with ties to the franchise made art that mirrors a key moment. Those gestures make fans hopeful, but they don’t equal formal canonization. Official continuity tends to require consistent adoption across multiple official channels.
So, my take is pragmatic: it’s influential and emotionally real to the fanbase, and it’s treated with some official affection, but it isn’t part of the core canon unless future releases explicitly integrate its plotlines. Either way, it’s left a mark, and I love how it makes people rethink characters in new, more vulnerable ways.
I get why people obsess over this one — it’s a juicy piece of storytelling that blurs the line between what’s 'official' and what lives in fandom hearts. From everything I’ve tracked, 'Edgar's Relentless Pursue for The Love of His Life' is not part of the original canon of the core series. The scenes, dialogue, and plot beats introduced there directly contradict timeline details and character motivations laid out in the main source material, and the original creator hasn’t incorporated those specific events into later official releases. That usually seals the deal for me: if it’s not referenced in sequels, companion materials, or creator commentary, it’s fan-originated.
That said, canon isn’t a single-lane highway. There are licensed tie-ins, author-approved side stories, and officially sanctioned spin-offs that sometimes become accepted as part of the greater continuity. In the case of 'Edgar's Relentless Pursue for The Love of His Life', there have been murmurs of creator approval on social media and a special illustration that echoes a scene, but nothing that overwrites the contradictions. So while it’s not strictly canonical, it's flirted with official recognition and that makes it feel almost-canon to a lot of people.
Personally, I treat it like a gloriously detailed headcanon: I enjoy its emotional beats and the way it explores character chemistry, but I also keep my timeline notes separate. It’s the kind of thing I’ll re-read on a rainy day and ship hard, while still being aware that the ‘official’ record tells a slightly different story.
For me, digging into whether Edgar's relentless pursuit is actually canon is like unfolding a favorite old manga's notebook: a mix of clear panels and scribbled margins.
On the page-by-page evidence, I find the core moments—scenes where Edgar goes out of his way, lines that show intent, and a couple of pivotal chapters that change his arc—pretty convincing. When those beats show up in the original serialized work, I tend to treat them as core truth. That said, adaptations and spin-offs sometimes push that pursuit into sitcom territory or romanticize it further, which muddies the perception among fans. Interviews, afterwords, or author-side notes can strengthen the claim, but I give the most weight to what actually made it into the primary narrative.
So, in my book the pursuit is canon enough to shape Edgar's character in the main story, though the tone and extent of it depend on whether you're reading the original text or watching/listening to other versions. I love that it adds a stubborn, endearing edge to him.