Why Is 'El Túnel' Considered A Psychological Novel?

I've always been fascinated by how 'El túnel' digs into the human psyche with such raw intensity. It's not just a story about obsession; it's a masterclass in psychological dissection. The protagonist, Juan Pablo Castel, isn't your typical unreliable narrator—he's a walking paradox of logic and madness, which makes every confession feel like peeling back layers of a wound. The way he fixates on María Iribarne isn't romantic; it's pathological. His tunnel metaphor isn't just poetic; it's a prison of his own making, where every thought loops back to paranoia and isolation. What gets me is how Sábato doesn't spoon-feed the reader. Castel's jealousy isn't dramatic outbursts; it's in the way he describes a painting or the silence between dialogues. The novel forces you to live inside his head, where reality twists into something claustrophobic and suffocating. That's psychological genius—it doesn't tell you he's broken; it makes you feel the cracks spreading.

And let's talk about the structure. Most psychological novels rely on flashbacks or therapy sessions, but 'El túnel' is a straight dive into Castel's confession. No detours, no safety nets. His voice is so unnervingly precise that you start questioning your own sanity. When he dissects María's slightest gestures—like the way she touches her hair—it's not love; it's forensic analysis. The novel's power lies in what it doesn't say. The gaps in Castel's logic, the moments where his narrative contradicts itself, these are the places where psychology bleeds through. Sábato doesn't need monsters or ghosts; the horror here is entirely human. That's why it sticks with you—it's not about what happens, but why a mind would choose to happen it.