How Did The New York Times Choose Its Best Books Of 2017?

As a book club organizer planning a retrospective readathon, I'm genuinely curious about the specific methodology used for the 2017 New York Times Best Books list. What criteria did their editorial board prioritize that year?
2026-08-05 22:28:28
102
공유
ABO 성격 퀴즈
빠른 퀴즈를 통해 당신이 Alpha, Beta, 아니면 Omega인지 알아보세요.
향기
성격
이상적인 사랑 패턴
비밀스러운 욕망
어두운 면
테스트 시작하기

11 답변

LilyJay
LilyJay
Book Guide Librarian
Transparency would be nice, but I get why they don't. If we knew it was just three people voting after reading only the first chapters, we'd lose faith. The myth of the diligent, full-read deliberation is part of the brand. Whether it's entirely true or not, it's what we buy into when we use their list as a guide.
2026-08-06 00:20:33
3
JohnClark
JohnClark
Story Finder Engineer
Wouldn't it be wild if they just drew titles from a hat? Kidding, obviously. But seriously, it's a human process with all the biases and brilliance that entails. Different editors have different passions—one might be deep into translated literature, another into historical biographies. The final list is the synthesis of those competing passions. Some years it feels spot-on; other years it feels like they're trying too hard to be esoteric. The fact that we're all here wondering about the 'how' means the mystique is working. It's less a science and more an art—the art of list-making with immense consequences.
2026-08-06 05:05:35
9
JackStone
JackStone
Story Finder Veterinarian
Coffee. Lots of coffee. And takeout containers. And passionate voices talking over each other. That's my mental image. On a serious note, the 'how' is deeply embedded in the culture of the New York Times Book Review itself, which has its own traditions and reputational concerns. They are the old guard. The process is about upholding a certain standard of literary excellence as they define it, which inherently leans toward realism, thematic weight, and prose craftsmanship. A dazzling sci-fi novel would have to work ten times harder to be seen as 'literary' enough for their process. That institutional lens is the invisible first filter.
2026-08-06 06:23:31
1
Cody
Cody
Detail Spotter Translator
Coffee. Lots of coffee. And arguments. Gentle, bookish arguments, but arguments nonetheless. I picture a room full of people who genuinely love books but have wildly different tastes. The quiet poetry lover versus the history buff versus the novelist wannabe. The final list is the fragile peace treaty they all sign.
2026-08-06 16:30:51
1
EmilyLong
EmilyLong
Reviewer Sales
It's an editorial product, first and foremost. The 'how' is the same 'how' for any feature story: pitch, debate, revise, finalize. The raw material is books instead of news events. The editor-in-chief of the Book Review has the final say, I'd imagine, after all the discussion. So it's a top-down curation flavored by bottom-up advocacy. A junior critic might passionately champion a book, but if the senior editors don't feel it, it won't fly. That hierarchy shapes the list in invisible ways.
2026-08-07 12:17:11
3
모든 답변 보기
QR 코드를 스캔하여 앱을 다운로드하세요

관련 작품

연관 질문

How does the New York Times choose the best books of all time?

9 답변2026-08-05 09:53:28
Word of mouth among the cultural elite. Certain books attain a status where it becomes unthinkable to not include them. It's a self-perpetuating cycle: the Times includes a book, which solidifies its classic status, which ensures the next generation of editors includes it too. The 'how' is often tradition. Breaking that cycle to include new voices is the hard part.

How did the New York Times select its best books of 2017?

16 답변2026-08-05 19:17:47
Meh. Another year, another list. I'm sure they have their methods. I'm more interested in the long-tail recommendations from niche forums or genre-specific awards. The Times process seems designed to create a mainstream literary event, which is fine, but it's not where I discover my favorite reads anymore. The internet has democratized taste-making, and I find the crowd-sourced wisdom of fellow readers more reliable than a closed-door committee.

How does the New York Times choose its 10 best books each year?

14 답변2026-08-05 12:32:05
Remember when they used to split it into fiction and nonfiction? I kind of miss that. Having a top five for each category gave more room for variety. The combined top ten feels more competitive and harsh, like a nonfiction book is directly ‘beating’ a novel for a scarce slot.

How did the New York Times choose its best books of 2022?

10 답변2026-08-05 22:20:12
Ultimately, they're making a list for their audience. So while literary merit is key, they're also considering what their readers will find engaging and worthwhile. A dense, experimental novel might be critically adored but deemed too niche for the list. The process involves balancing artistic achievement with broader appeal. It's a tricky line to walk, and you can see them walking it every year.

How did the New York Times select its best books of 2016 list?

8 답변2026-08-05 04:13:08
Imagine the relief when it's over. The list is published, the tweets go out, the articles are written. The editors probably take a day off, exhausted. Then the cycle starts again in January with the first advance readers copies of the next year. The 'how' is a marathon, not a sprint. It's a year-long process of reading, discussing, and filtering that culminates in a few intense weeks of decision-making. The published list is the tip of a massive iceberg of labor, passion, and inevitable disagreement. It's a testament to the messy, wonderful, subjective human love of stories.

How does the New York Times choose its best books of 2023?

15 답변2026-08-05 22:51:25
Accessibility matters more than they let on. A 900-page experimental novel in verse has a higher bar to clear than a tight, 250-page family drama, simply because the judges know only a fraction of their audience will actually finish the former. The list has to be credible as a recommendation for a broad, intelligent audience. Even if they admire the 900-page monster, they might deem it too specialized for a 'best of' list meant for general consumption.

How does the New York Times select best books of the year?

12 답변2026-08-05 19:30:05
It's not just one list, either. They have '100 Notable Books' first, then whittle it down to the top 10. The notable list is itself a curated selection from thousands. So the process is two-tiered: first, inclusion in the notable list (a huge honor), then the fierce competition for the final cut. Being on the longlist means you've been seriously considered by their entire books team. The final ten are the ones that survived the brutal comparative debates.

How does the New York Times choose its best books ever list?

13 답변2026-08-05 15:30:43
What even counts as 'ever'? That's the first problem. Are they judging by literary innovation, cultural impact, or pure storytelling? The Times' critics likely have a bias toward certain styles—often dense, realist, 'important' fiction. You'll see far fewer genre titles or works from non-Western traditions unless they've been thoroughly sanctioned by the literary establishment. The selection pool starts with what they've chosen to review, which already filters out vast swathes of publishing. So the mechanism is a panel, but the input is pre-curated. It's a feedback loop of taste. They're brilliant critics, no doubt, but their 'best ever' is a reflection of a specific, insular world. I find more interesting recommendations in niche forums or from translators who are actually digging globally. The Times list is a useful benchmark, but it's just one map of a much larger territory.

How does the New York Times choose its best romance books?

12 답변2026-08-05 16:51:57
The international angle is often missing. The list is overwhelmingly dominated by American and British authors writing in English. There's a whole world of romance being written and translated from other languages that rarely gets a look in. When it does, it's treated as a special 'exotic' entry. Their selection process seems geographically myopic, relying on the traditional Anglo-American publishing pipeline. They could do so much more to highlight translated works, which would genuinely expand the definition of 'best' and introduce readers to completely new storytelling rhythms and cultural contexts.

How does the New York Times choose its best 100 books list?

10 답변2026-08-05 01:13:12
Hmm. I've never really looked at the list itself, just the arguments it causes online. Maybe I should check one out? Are they usually in order, like #1 is the absolute best? That seems impossible to decide.
좋은 소설을 무료로 찾아 읽어보세요
GoodNovel 앱에서 수많은 인기 소설을 무료로 즐기세요! 마음에 드는 작품을 다운로드하고, 언제 어디서나 편하게 읽을 수 있습니다
앱에서 작품을 무료로 읽어보세요
앱에서 읽으려면 QR 코드를 스캔하세요.
DMCA.com Protection Status