6 回答2026-08-03 00:38:21
Honestly, half the fun is in the confusion and then the satisfying 'aha!' when the connections click. Don't rob yourself of that by over-planning. Dive in. The landscape will catch you. The order of the stones in the river doesn't matter once you're swimming.
8 回答2026-08-03 00:32:30
Why read in order? Because Kerney's life changes drastically from book to book. If you read them out of sequence, major personal events—like family developments and career shifts—won't land with the same impact. The prequels, starting with 'Hard Country', are fantastic but were written to enrich the saga after the fact. I'd slot them in after the main series for a 'how we got here' effect. Check a library catalog or a site like Fantastic Fiction for a clean, numbered list of the Kerney novels.
4 回答2026-07-29 00:12:27
I'm just here for the Berrybender Narratives slander. Everyone forgets them! If you like chaotic, darkly funny historical soap operas on the frontier, that's a whole four-book series: 'Sin Killer', 'The Wandering Hill', 'By Sorrow's River', 'Folly and Glory'. It's a totally separate, bizarre thread in his bibliography. Reading order for those is simply publication order. They're a wild detour from the McMurtry you think you know.
9 回答2026-08-03 09:58:20
The character development is the main reason for order. In 'Tularosa,' Kerney is a somewhat broken, solitary figure. By the time you reach 'Resurrection,' he's a family man, a leader, but still carrying all those old scars. You see him learn to trust, to love again, to be a father.
If you read a random later book first, that arc is spoiled. You'd know who he ends up with, what happens to his career, which friends he loses along the way. The crimes are well-plotted, but the heart of the series is Kerney himself. Protect that journey for yourself by starting at the beginning.
3 回答2026-08-03 03:32:38
It’s less about a strict checklist and more about the echo of decisions across time. A feud started in 'Backlands' might influence a land dispute in 'Hermit's Peak'. Kevin's stubbornness makes more sense when you’ve seen his grandfather’s struggle. I’d recommend reading the first few Kevin books ('Tularosa', 'Mexican Hat'), then loop back to the prequels before continuing. That way, you’re invested in the present-day character before uncovering the roots.
5 回答2026-07-29 22:00:48
Why not start with the first book he ever wrote, 'Horseman, Pass By'? It's slim, powerful, and establishes all his major themes: changing Texas, generational conflict, loss. You see the seeds of everything that comes later. It's like watching a master painter's first confident sketch. Then you can see how he expanded that canvas over time. Jumping straight to his later, denser work can be overwhelming; this is a gentle, brilliant introduction to his voice and preoccupations.
It's a quiet masterpiece that often gets overshadowed.
1 回答2026-08-03 03:33:00
Fun fact: the very first book is 'Tularosa', which came out in 1996. It's a great starting point because it introduces Kevin Kerney as a former Santa Fe police chief who's pulled out of retirement. I always tell people to start there to see his whole arc, from dealing with the death of his son to getting back into law enforcement in New Mexico. You get his complicated personal life and the desert setting right from the beginning. It's more of a slow-burn character study mixed with a solid mystery, so don't go in expecting a fast-paced thriller. The series really builds on the foundations laid here.
6 回答2026-07-29 09:20:19
Nobody's mentioning 'The Last Picture Show'. It's not the same characters as the Westerns, but it's part of his Thalia, Texas series with 'Texasville' and 'Duane's Depressed'. So you've got two separate 'connected' universes: the frontier epics and the small-town Texas comedies.
8 回答2026-07-29 07:21:19
Hmm, I've only read the first one. Are the others actually worth it, or do they diminish the original? I've been burned by sequels and prequels before.