8 Answers2025-08-30
They must have had a lot of freedom to shot the scenes in these locations. Rather than shooting a lot of tight shot-reverse-shot scenes in blank rooms for long dull dialogues, they shot the scenes where characters were skating or walking on a beach or leaning up against a classic car on a side street. The locations determined where the action and dialog would be in each scene. The result is a dynamic and alive film.
13 Answers2025-10-27
Methinks the origin of Room 23 is a red herring, a diversion from the true horror at hand. The true power of horror is in the execution, and that dripping faucet sound eventually syncs up with your heartbeats in short order. Oh, and slowly reading through scattered documents changes up the details of the room on second pass. That's power, that's skill. The spark that set it all off – a photo of a real hotel, a bad dream – is of no consequence whatsoever. The true horror is the horror that it does to you, and Room 23 scores high on that count. I shy away from rooms numbered 23 in hotels to this day. The designers deserve it, regardless of their genesis.
4 Answers2025-06-18
Alternate-history Seattle in the 1880s. Seattle is a walled city, hovering on the brink of collapse, filled with noxious toxic gas and the gaping wound left by the cataclysmic event of the Boneshaker. The privileged few live in “clean” districts of the city, while the vast majority of citizens are reduced to scavenging in the horrible Blight for the occasional, fleeting treasure. Others live in the vast, underground maze that exists below the city proper. Airships rule the skies and even seemingly safe cobblestones conceal hidden threats. Priest’s Seattle is a visceral, steampunk world of air, noise, rust and fear.
3 Answers2026-01-15
So the core of Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil is true. Jim Williams’ trial, the Garden of Good and Evil’s setting in Savannah, the figures that walk through the story like sentinels. But Berendt did modify events in order to make the book better for readers. In interviews he has acknowledged that he sometimes combined events in order to better describe a scene, or to more accurately capture a conversation. Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil is a true crime book, a travel book, a character study. After finishing the book I devoured interviews and articles about the real people in the book, and each was more impressive than the last. The truth of the book is the foundation upon which Berendt builds something even wilder.
4 Answers2026-07-08
This is nonfiction. The author uses the true story of the real Dodd family as a narrative in order to portray the events of 1933 in Berlin through their eyes. All of the major historical figures and events in this book are based on real life and the author used a variety of sources from archives to write this book. The true story of the decent Dodd family and their struggle to come to terms with the evil that surrounded them is the greatest aspect of this book. The story is written as if it were a novel, but the extensive research behind every scene is proven in the source notes at the end of the book.
12 Answers2026-04-13
None of your business, and anyone telling you is a liar trying to get attention for harming the artists in some way. Just stop. Talk about their work instead.
9 Answers2025-08-28
I’ve always been one to look for the reasoning behind the choices of locations for films. The film The Fallen, for example, shot in Jordan where the locations provided an idealized version of the past; a lost, great civilization, that existed in a very harsh and beautiful land. The Czech locations, on the other hand, represented the very corrupt and complicated present of all politics and shadows and decaying institutions. The geographical narrative was without a doubt a huge factor in the film feeling as cohesive as it does thematically. The locations weren’t just chosen because they were pretty, they were chosen to further reinforce the storyline of the film. The heat haze in the desert and the chill fog in the Bohemian woods are not just weather conditions, they also symbolize emotions that the actors had to really experience for themselves and not just pretend to in front of a fan with a green screen behind them.
11 Answers2025-10-22
I’m going to be contrarian here and say that I knew the film was shot in Georgia, and that took me out of the film a little bit. I think that it was a budget decision and not an artistic choice. Because this film is set in a very specific cultural world—the Australian elite swimming system, the suburban world of competition swimming—the film really needs to be shot on location to really create that world. Otherwise it’s just going to feel like a film about baseball shot in Texas when it’s really a film about baseball in Cuba. They pulled it off well in terms of the acting and writing, but I do think that a little bit of authenticity was left behind in Australia and shot in Georgia instead.
7 Answers2026-04-16
Mostly at Warner Brothers Ranch with various other locations used for key scenes. All shooting took place on the enormous property which has several large lakes, extensive forests, and lots of wide-open space to establish a country-like setting. A fish pond would have been one of the property’s several large reservoirs. The scenes shot at the schoolhouse would have likely been shot on the ‘town’ part of the set at Warner Brothers. A small crew would have traveled to Virginia for a few specific ‘pickup shots’ of the Blue Ridge Mountains – and that was about it. They would have also shot and edited together a ton of pre-existing footage to acheive the iconic shots they needed in those scenes. Very resourceful and cost effective.
10 Answers2025-06-20
The story is set on a remote homestead in Alaska but that in itself becomes a trap, both physically and emotionally. The father’s ego and ego trips to prove himself mean he cannot admit defeat at the homestead even when it would be safer for him. For the mother and daughter it is a trap of dependency and fear, of how to leave and how to make change happen. The beauty of the setting lures you in, but the brutality of it locked around you like a trap, making each attempt to leave or to make change happen even more tense. It is not scenery, it is an antagonist in a domestic thriller, continually raising the stakes and limiting choices for the three protagonists.