Library

Federalist Republic

Karila Aistarabaw I is the last woman in Egyptian history to receive a royal title. Her inherited family wealth has placed her at the center of Western threats, where the war for power has intensified in recent years. With a mere title within a republic commanded by an antagonistic president, Karila lives for revenge in the name of all the losses she had suffered, but is faced with an unknown coming from America capable of making her relearn each of her most intimate principles in the name of a forbidden attraction that will change his life forever.

120 Chapters

The Alpha and The Slave

Elena Tepes is the strongest female werewolf in all of Europe. Not only that she is the Alpha of her pack but also she is the Alpha Supreme of all Europe. Many males came to challenge her, but no one defeated her in a fight. One day she is called by a werewolf from the Silver Pack, in the Republic of Moldova. He said that the Alpha of his pack has a slave. The law of the werewolves forbids any pack to have slaves. Elena, in the beginning, doesn´t believe but either way, it is her duty to find out if it true or not. When Elena gets to the Silver Pack, she saves the slave from a cruel whipping and realizes that the slave is her mate. But she doesn´t want him. Elena doesn´t want a weak mate, that shivers in fear every time he sees her and stutters when he talks. She wants a strong mate. Elena wants a strong mate because she has a mortal enemy- Mihnea, the vampire. He is strong and cunning, and almost impossible to kill. He made a deal with Hades, and he can´t be killed with ordinary weapons. As long as Mihnea is alive, she won´t accept her mate. One day, while Elena looks into Vladimir´s beautiful green eyes and her heart starts beating fast. Little by little, Elena finds herself more drawn by the pure heart of my mate. And when they share a first kiss, everything changes. She wants him, and she wants him forever. But something happened in Vladimir´s past because he keeps telling Elena he is not worthy of love, that he did something terrible, and innocent blood is on his hands. Will Elena learn to accept and love her mate?

67 Chapters

Likaya's Wolves: The Suha Marshes

---> if you are interested in my work, please check out my novel The Starving Vulture. Available on Amazon, $3.99 for the Ebook and $14.95 for the Paperback https://www.amazon.com/Starving-Vulture-Miguel-Monta%C3%B1a/dp/1951150899<--------- Aster Likaya is a Battle Mage of the Zeraph Republic. Raised in a military family, she was destined for a life on the front. As a Battle Mage she has mastered the art of Controlling. A simple but effective kind of magic that is necessary when one bonds and commands the essential robotic warmachines of her world. The Gearbanes. And now, she is a Captain. But much to her surprise, she is not handed a company but a unit of stoic and silent soldiers that call themselves DragonWolves. Her second in command, is Lieutenant Able Froster, young but grim faced soldier who has seen combat since he was barely a boy. For their first mission, they are given a simple task. Retrieve an agent of the Republic who is lost in the vast swampland known as the Suha Marshes. Little do they know, that they are not the only factions searching for the man. For in the Suha Marshes, hunt the cannibalistic Birchmen and the Kolysian pirates. All eager for the prize the agent carries. This is the world of Likaya and Froster. Dominated by machines powered by magic, weapons ignited by runes and wars fought over ancient relics forged by a forgotten past. Welcome to Likaya's Wolves.

Not enough ratings

27 Chapters

The 5-time Rejected Gamma & the Lycan King

BOOK ONE of COALESCENCE OF THE FIVE: After being rejected by 5 mates, Gamma Lucianne pleaded with the Moon Goddess to spare her from any further mate-bonds. To her dismay, she is being bonded for the sixth time. What’s worse is that her sixth-chance mate is the most powerful creature ruling over all werewolves and Lycans - the Lycan King himself. She is certain, dead certain, that a rejection would come sooner or later, though she hopes for it to be sooner. King Alexandar was ecstatic to meet his bonded mate, and couldn’t thank their Goddess enough for gifting him someone so perfect. However, he soon realizes that this gift is reluctant to accept him, and more than willing to sever their bond. He tries to connect with her but she seems so far away. He is desperate to get intimate with her but she seems reluctant to open up to him. He tries to tell her that he is willing to commit to her for the rest of his life but she doesn’t seem to believe him. He is pleading for a chance: a chance to get to know her; a chance to show her that he’s different; and a chance to love her. But when not-so-subtle crushes, jealous suitors, self-entitled Queen-wannabes, an old flame, a silent protector and a past wedding engagement threaten to jeopardize their relationship, will Lucianne and Xandar still choose to be together? Is their love strong enough to overcome everything and everyone? Or will Lucianne resort to enduring a sixth rejection from the one person she thought she could entrust her heart with? *** BOOK TWO: The Rogues Who Went Rogue BOOK THREE: The Indomitable Huntress & the Hardened Duke

9.7

200 Chapters

My Boss Is Clueless

Ariel Young finally had her life together. She graduated from a prestigious University in New York and finally landed her dream job.Well...not exactly THE job. Her goal is to start from the bottom and work her way up to become the Executive member of the company. To achieve that goal, she decided to accept the job as the assistant of the CEO at the company. A narcissistic nightmarish of a person who became determined to make her his woman.Find my interview with Goodnovel: https://tinyurl.com/yxmz84q2

9.7

51 Chapters

The Father Of My Twins

Her marriage has been unsuccessful since that day she got married to him. One sided love, and his unknown hatred towards her. "I'd rather sleep in the guest room than with you". His threatening voice echoed inside the room before he left. She finally understood the reality, married to him for a whole five years, only to discover now that he only used her to claim his inheritance. She was so heartbroken when she caught her own husband and his Mistress on a date that he has never taken her to, not even once. Anyways, who was she to call her his Mistress?. She should have understood that the Lady was his only Love of his Life, on the other hand, she was just an urgent second choice because his family didn't support his marriage with a lowly class. But now he actually became the Boss that he was, he didn't care about any bullshit from his family. "I guess, I won't regret what I'm about to do, I'm tired". Night falls, her drunken Handsome Husband she had admired all those years was finally at her own mercy. "There's no backing down this time around!. I won't always be treated like some pushover!". When the morning time arrived, a document "DIVORCE AGREEMENT" could be seen at the top of the bed. "Where is she?!". "E…. Em…. Your wife already left Boss".

8.5

62 Chapters

How Did Federalist John Jay Contribute To U.S. Foreign Policy?

8 Answers2025-10-22 10:19:21

John Jay's role in shaping U.S. foreign policy is truly fascinating and often underrated. He was one of the key figures in crafting the foundations of American diplomacy after the Revolutionary War. To kick things off, as a member of the Continental Congress, Jay was involved in negotiating the Treaty of Paris in 1783, which officially ended the war with Great Britain. His diplomatic skills were invaluable in securing favorable terms for the fledgling nation, emphasizing his ability to navigate complex international relations.

Later, as the first Chief Justice of the United States and a prominent federalist, Jay pushed for ratification of the Constitution, advocating a strong central government to manage foreign affairs effectively. His belief in a balanced and robust executive branch laid the groundwork for how the U.S. would conduct itself on the global stage.

He also played a pivotal role in creating the Jay Treaty with Great Britain in 1794. While it was controversial and met with opposition, it was crucial in stabilizing U.S.-British relations, addressing issues like trade and the withdrawal of British troops from U.S. territories. This treaty ultimately helped secure American sovereignty and economic stability in the early years of the republic. Jay’s contributions significantly shaped the nation's foreign policy direction, marrying diplomacy with a keen awareness of geopolitical realities. Truly, his impact is woven into the fabric of early American diplomacy, showing how one individual can influence an entire nation's standing in the world.

Whenever I delve into America's early history, I find it enlightening to consider figures like John Jay, whose strategic thinking and commitment to the cause of a strong, independent nation are often overshadowed by more flamboyant personalities.

What Are The Major Achievements Of Federalist John Jay'S Career?

4 Answers2025-10-12 23:22:44

John Jay was one of those historical figures whose impact rippled through the early years of the United States. One of his standout achievements was his role as a key negotiator of the Treaty of Paris in 1783, which officially ended the American Revolutionary War. He deftly navigated the complex diplomatic landscape alongside Benjamin Franklin and John Adams, successfully securing significant territorial gains for the fledgling nation. That's no small feat, considering how precarious and divided things were back then!

Additionally, Jay served as the first Chief Justice of the United States from 1789 to 1795. This was a pivotal time in establishing a robust judicial framework for a brand-new country. He made significant contributions towards outlining the powers and responsibilities of the judiciary, laying down important precedents that are still relevant today. His leadership helped shape the role of the Supreme Court in interpreting the Constitution.

As a co-author of 'The Federalist Papers', alongside Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, he championed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. His essays focused on the importance of a strong central government, arguing for checks and balances that would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. This deepened our systems of governance and started a national dialogue about rights and representations. Jay was not just a contributor; he was an architect of the republic's foundations, truly a remarkable figure in American history!

How To Get To Onyx Dominican Republic From Nearby Cities?

3 Answers2025-10-11 22:05:20

Getting to Onyx in the Dominican Republic is a breeze if you're coming from nearby cities. For example, if you’re starting your journey from Santo Domingo, you have a couple of options at your disposal. The easiest and most common way is to hop on a bus. You can catch one from several terminals in downtown Santo Domingo that head towards Punta Cana, which is relatively close to Onyx. The bus ride typically lasts about two to three hours, depending on traffic, and is a comfortable way to enjoy the scenic views of the countryside.

Alternatively, if you prefer a more personalized experience or are traveling with a group, you could look into renting a car or scheduling a private shuttle service. This allows for flexibility in stopping at small towns along the way and soaking up the local culture. Just make sure to navigate the roads carefully—driving in the Dominican Republic can be an adventure in itself! Keep an eye out for shared van services, known as ‘carros públicos’ as well, which are popular among locals and can be an economical option.

For those steeped in a vacation mindset, catch an early morning flight directly to Punta Cana International Airport, which is only about 30 minutes away from Onyx. With all these options, you’re all set for a fantastic escape to this vibrant destination! I'm always excited to share the journey with friends, imagining the fun adventures we’ll have upon arrival. It's all part of the thrill!

How Does Plato The Republic Describe The Tripartite Soul?

4 Answers2025-08-29 23:01:04

When I first dug into Plato's 'Republic' as a restless undergrad, what gripped me wasn’t just the big city metaphors but how he slices the inner life into three distinct voices. He calls them roughly reason, spirit, and appetite. Reason (the rational part) is the thinking, calculating part that loves truth and should rule; spirit (thumos) is the part that craves honor and supports reason, especially in resisting shame or fear; appetite (the many desires) chases bodily needs, pleasures, money, and all the messy cravings.

Plato links this to his ideal city so tightly that it clicked for me: rulers = reason, auxiliaries = spirit, producers = appetites. Justice, for him, is harmony — each part doing its proper work under reason’s guidance. He ties virtues to these parts too: wisdom with rulers, courage with spirit, temperance with appetite, and justice when all three fit together. Reading it now I still like picturing the soul as a small city where the rational mayor keeps things from descending into chaos — it’s a tidy moral map that actually helps when my own impulses argue for pizza at 2 a.m.

What Is The Main Argument In Federalist Papers 1?

5 Answers2025-09-06 08:04:31

Reading 'Federalist No. 1' always gives me a little jolt — it's like Hamilton slapping the table and saying, pay attention. The main thrust is straightforward: the stakes of the new Constitution are enormous and the people must judge it honestly, not through factional interest or fashionable slogans. He frames the essay as the opening move in a reasoned public debate, insisting that this isn't about partisan posturing but the long-term public good.

He also warns about human nature — that people and factions tend to seek private advantage — so the Constitution must be designed and assessed with caution and clear-eyed realism. Finally, there's an urgency threading through the piece: delay or half-measures could be disastrous, so candid, dispassionate scrutiny is necessary. Reading it, I always feel like I'm being invited into a serious conversation about responsibility, not just politics, and that invitation still feels relevant today.

How Do Scholars Interpret Federalist Papers 1 Today?

1 Answers2025-09-06 10:11:53

Honestly, diving into 'Federalist No. 1' always feels like cracking open the opening chapter of a long, strange saga: Hamilton steps up to frame the whole conversation, warns of the stakes, and sets a tone that’s part moral exhortation and part courtroom opening statement. Scholars today tend to read it less as a narrow historical artifact and more as a deliberate rhetorical gambit. It’s the framers’ attempt to coach the public about how to think about the Constitution—appealing to reason, warning against factional passions, and asking readers to judge the plan by long-term public good rather than short-term local biases. People in my reading group often point out how Hamilton tries to balance ethos, pathos, and logos: he establishes credibility, tweaks emotions with vivid warnings about anarchy or tyranny, and then promises a calm, reasoned debate on the merits. That rhetorical setup is crucial to how scholars interpret the rest of the papers because No. 1 tells you how to listen to the subsequent arguments.

From an academic perspective, interpretations split into a few lively camps. Intellectual historians emphasize context: the dangers of weak confederation, post‑Revolution economic turmoil, and the very real contingency that the experiment in republican government might fail. Constitutional theorists and political scientists sometimes read No. 1 as an exercise in elite persuasion—Hamilton clearly worried about “improvident or wicked men” and thus his language has been used by some scholars to argue that the Constitution was pitched by elites who feared popular passions. Other scholars push back, noting that Hamilton’s republicanism still rests on popular consent and that his warnings are as much about preserving liberty from internal decay as protecting it from external threats. Rhetorical scholars love dissecting No. 1 because it’s an instructive primer in persuasion: set the stakes, discredit your rivals’ motives, and then promise evidence. Legal historians also note that while courts use the Federalist papers selectively, No. 1 is less a source of doctrinal guidance and more a statement of intent and attitude—useful for understanding framers’ concerns but not a blueprint for constitutional text.

What I really enjoy is the way contemporary readers keep finding it eerily relevant. In an age of polarization, misinformation, and short attention spans, Hamilton’s pleas about weighing proposals on their merits rather than partisan fervor ring true. Teachers use No. 1 to kick off classes because it forces students to ask: how should a republic persuade its people? Activists and commentators pull lines about civic prudence when debating reform. And on a personal note, rereading it with a warm mug and some marginalia feels like joining a centuries-old conversation—one that’s messy, argumentative, and oddly hopeful. If you’re curious, try reading No. 1 aloud with a friend and then compare notes; it’s amazing how much the tone shapes what you hear next, and it leaves you thinking about what persuasion in public life should even look like these days.

How Should Students Analyze Federalist Papers 1 For Essays?

1 Answers2025-09-06 23:25:29

Diving into 'Federalist Paper No. 1' is one of those reading moments that makes me want to slow down and underline everything. I usually start with a slow, close read—sentence-by-sentence—because Hamilton packs so many moves into that opening salvo. For an essay, treat your first pass as a scavenger hunt: identify the thesis (Hamilton’s claim about the stakes of the ratification debate), note his intended audience (the citizens of New York and skeptics of the new Constitution), and flag lines that show his rhetorical strategy. I like to annotate margins with shorthand: ETHOS for credibility moves, LOGOS for logical claims, PATHOS for emotional appeals, and DEVICES for rhetorical flourishes like antithesis or rhetorical questions. That makes it easy to build paragraphs later without slipping into summary.

After the close read, zoom out and set context. A solid paragraph in your essay should show you know the moment: 1787, state ratifying conventions, heavy debate about union vs. disunion. Mention that 'Federalist Paper No. 1'—authored by Alexander Hamilton—opens the project and frames the stakes: the experiment of a new government designed to secure safety and happiness. That context helps you explain why Hamilton stresses reasoned debate over factionalism, and why his repeated calls for sober judgment are persuasive to readers worried about instability. I always tie a textual detail to the historical backdrop: when Hamilton warns against appeals to passion, you can connect that to the very real fears of mob rule or foreign influence at the time.

Structure your essay using tight paragraph architecture. Each body paragraph should start with a claim (your own sentence about what Hamilton is doing), provide a brief quote or paraphrase from the paper, then spend most of the paragraph unpacking HOW the language works. Don’t just drop a quotation and move on—analyze diction (e.g., ‘‘safety and happiness’’ vs. ‘‘usurpations’’), syntax (short, punchy sentences for emphasis; longer sentences to build authority), and rhetorical tactics (appealing to prudence, delegitimizing opponents by calling them 'uncharitable' or 'rash', anticipating counterarguments). Also look for logical structure: Hamilton often frames problems, suggests the stakes, and calls for reasoned judgement—follow that movement in your paragraphs and mirror it in your own transitions.

Bring in counterargument and secondary scholarship to deepen your analysis. Anticipate critics: what might someone say about Hamilton’s elitist tone or his assumptions about human nature? You can use a sentence to concede a limitation and then show why Hamilton’s rhetorical choices compensate. Sprinkle in one or two scholarly perspectives if your assignment allows—historians like Gordon S. Wood or legal scholars who discuss Federalist rhetoric can give weight to your claims. Finally, craft a sharp thesis early: for example, ‘‘In 'Federalist Paper No. 1' Hamilton frames the Constitution as a choice between reasoned deliberation and factional chaos, using a blend of authoritative tone, moral appeals, and anticipatory rebuttals to convince skeptical New Yorkers.’’ Use the conclusion to reflect briefly on significance—why this opening matters for the whole project of the Federalist essays—and maybe suggest a modern parallel or a question for further thinking. When you finish, read your draft aloud: the Federalist is about persuasion, so your essay should persuade too, with clear claims, vivid textual evidence, and engaging analysis.

What Star Wars Books Are Set In The Old Republic Era?

2 Answers2025-10-07 04:29:43

When delving into the 'Star Wars' universe, especially the Old Republic era, we discover a treasure trove of books that transport us back to the ancient history of the galaxy. Two really standout novels come to mind: 'Drew Karpyshyn's Darth Bane Trilogy' and 'Deceived' by Paul S. Kemp. I can't help but admire the intricate world-building in this time period. The Sith and Jedi are at each other's throats in such a raw and compelling way. In 'Darth Bane: Path of Destruction,' we follow Bane’s journey as he makes his way through the aftermath of the New Sith Wars, exploring themes of power, betrayal, and the desire to reshape the galaxy’s future. It’s gritty, and you really get a sense of how the Sith philosophy evolved, which is just super fascinating! The exploration of the dark side isn’t just about the flashy lightsaber duels; it’s deeply psychological, making you question morality and the toll power takes on the soul.

Then, you simply cannot miss 'Deceived,' which takes place around the time of the 'Star Wars: The Old Republic' MMO. This book centers around the character of Darth Malgus, whose complex persona and motivations are explored in depth. The action is intense, and the battle scenes immerse you in the chaos of the Galactic War, but it’s the character dynamics that grip me the most. Seeing the frailty of alliances, both personal and political, in such a high-stakes environment reveals so much depth that it’s hard to put down.

If you dive into these tales, it’s essential to know the context of the 'Old Republic' as a time of immense conflict and transformation for both the Jedi and the Sith. I’ve read them multiple times, and each go-around reveals new nuances I’d missed before. Whether you're a die-hard fan or just dipping your toes into the 'Star Wars' pool, these books offer an exhilarating ride.

Where Were The Writers Of The Federalist Papers From?

4 Answers2025-08-21 18:24:05

As a history enthusiast, I find the origins of the Federalist Papers' writers fascinating. These brilliant minds hailed from diverse backgrounds, but most were deeply rooted in the American colonies. Alexander Hamilton, the driving force behind the project, was born in the Caribbean but moved to New York as a teenager. John Jay, another key contributor, was a native New Yorker, born and raised in the bustling city. James Madison, often called the 'Father of the Constitution,' was from Virginia, representing the Southern perspective. Their varied origins enriched the Papers, blending urban commercial interests with agrarian views.

What’s particularly interesting is how their regional identities shaped their arguments. Hamilton’s New York upbringing influenced his advocacy for strong federal power and commerce, while Madison’s Virginian roots grounded his emphasis on states' rights and individual liberties. Jay, with his legal and diplomatic experience, brought a pragmatic tone to the discussions. These differences didn’t divide them; instead, they created a balanced vision for the new nation. The Federalist Papers remain a testament to how diverse backgrounds can unite for a common cause.

Which Writers Of The Federalist Papers Became President?

4 Answers2025-08-21 23:09:38

As a history enthusiast, I've always been fascinated by the Founding Fathers and their contributions to American democracy. The Federalist Papers, a series of essays advocating for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, were primarily written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Out of these three brilliant minds, only James Madison went on to become the fourth President of the United States. Madison's presidency was marked by significant events like the War of 1812 and the establishment of many foundational policies.

Alexander Hamilton, though a towering figure in early American politics, never became president. His life was cut short by the infamous duel with Aaron Burr. John Jay, another key contributor, served as the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court but never held the office of president. Madison's presidency is often overshadowed by his earlier work on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but his leadership during a tumultuous period in American history is worth remembering.