Library

The Canterbury Tales The Monk

Part One:When Jamie Dalton moved into the house her grandparents left her she was just looking to reconnect with her past and settle in familiar surroundings. Digging through the attic for treasures, she found a nearly life-sized statue of a wolf and a very old, very strange book, Legends of the Werewolf. She was shocked when her new neighbor, Mike Volka, introduced himself and the eyes watching her looked just like the wolf in the book. Using the hypnotic power of the shifter, he draws her into his web and they have sex so hot it nearly burns down the house.Part TwoShifter Lia Popescue is desperate to find the book, Legends of the Werewolf, her only clue as to what happened to her pack. Her attempts to recover it bring her into contact with Riley Morgan, a contact that explodes with sexual chemistry. When she loses her heart to the sexy detective, she wonders how he will handle knowing the truth about her.USA Today best-selling and award-winning author Desiree Holt writes everything from romantic suspense and paranormal to erotic. and has been referred to by USA Today as the Nora Roberts of erotic romance, and is a winner of the EPIC E-Book Award, the Holt Medallion and a Romantic Times Reviewers Choice nominee. She has been featured on CBS Sunday Morning and in The Village Voice, The Daily Beast, USA Today, The (London) Daily Mail, The New Delhi Times and numerous other national and international publications.Wolf Tales is created by Desiree Holt, an EGlobal Creative Publishing signed author.

43 Chapters

Tales of the Heart

Serena Montana is a career woman who's working as a signed writer for a big publishing company in Brisbane, Australia. She received a great news from her Boss that her manuscript was handpicked by a famous production company, and they will have a television adaptation of her novel. Since 50% of the scenes from the novel is back in Walnut Creek, a small countryside area where she grew up, she needs to go back their and relieve the past with her first love, Paolo. Can she successfully finish her work without leaving her heart in Walnut Creek?

112 Chapters

Bloody Tales

'The library is forbidden after dark!' But for Deborah Waters, an adventurous teenager and aspiring journalist, the thrill of the unknown is simply irresistible. As she navigates the challenges of settling into a new town and school, she can’t help but be drawn to the whispers of the library’s hidden secrets. With each step into the shadows, she uncovers spine-tingling tales that promise to reveal more than just stories—they hold the key to mysteries waiting to be unraveled. Will Deborah’s daring curiosity lead her to thrilling discoveries, or will she find herself entangled in a web of danger? Join her on this gripping journey where every page turned could be a step into the unknown!

Not enough ratings

14 Chapters

The Tales Next Door

Not enough ratings

11 Chapters

Fictionary Tales

FICTIONARY TALES: A collection of short stories. Welcome to fictionary tales all written by me which include topics such as KARMA, Love, Revenge, Trauma, Tragedy, Happy endings, Sad endings, Mystery, Adventure and so much more!!

6 Chapters

Norbert's Tales

Rachel had never known what the 'ultimate-freshman-torture'would look like until'the-Norbert-Williams-Karter', Winchester college's bad boy takes interest in her. Unable to face the torment from Allison, Norbert's girlfriend, Rachel flees back to her family home.. leaving behind her reputation that had been seriously marred by Allison as 'STALKER'and'SLURT'. But Rachel soon returns the next semester to complete her scholarship after Allison had disappeared as well. Her disappearance gives a single Norbert the chance to flirt and mingle with Rachel who is still trying to save the little dignity of hers left. But the irresistible Norbert comes up with a mischievous, more like devilish plan where they fake date for a week to clear people's mindset of her, while he in turn gets in her pants. What will happen when Allison gets back? Or when Peter-a transferred student takes immediate and intense interest in Rachel? Or when things fall apart??...

13 Chapters

Why Is The Monk Controversial In The Canterbury Tales?

3 Answers2025-08-03 09:28:25

I’ve always been fascinated by the Monk in 'The Canterbury Tales' because he’s such a walking contradiction. Instead of living a life of poverty and prayer like monks are supposed to, he’s all about hunting, fine clothes, and good food. Chaucer paints him as this wealthy, worldly figure who couldn’t care less about monastic vows. It’s hilarious but also kinda shocking because it’s such a blatant critique of the Church’s corruption back then. The Monk’s love for luxury and his dismissive attitude toward rules make him controversial—he’s basically everything a monk shouldn’t be. Chaucer uses him to show how far some clergy members had strayed from their ideals, and that’s why he sticks in your mind long after reading.

How Does Canterbury Tales The Monk Influence The Tales' Tone?

4 Answers2025-09-03 07:08:49

I get a kick out of how the Monk flips the mood in 'The Canterbury Tales'—he's like a character who can change the music in the middle of a road trip. When Chaucer paints him in the General Prologue, you meet a man who prizes hunting and fine horses over quiet devotion, and that portrait already sets a wry, slightly mocking tone. Reading his presence, I felt the pilgrimage become less pious and more worldly, which primes you for irony every time someone claims moral high ground.

Then his own story, 'The Monk's Tale', dives into a different register: it's a gloomy roll-call of fallen greats, a sequence of tragic exempla. That shift to elegiac, didactic tone creates an odd friction—Chaucer lets a worldly monk deliver stern moral lessons, and the contrast makes the moralizing feel both earnest and suspect. For me, that double-voice—jocular pilgrim, solemn storyteller—keeps the whole collection lively and unpredictable. It’s like hearing a friend suddenly get serious at a party; the change is striking and makes both tones feel sharper.

How Does Canterbury Tales The Monk Contrast With The Prioress?

4 Answers2025-09-03 05:35:33

I get a kick out of how Chaucer paints the two so clearly different that they feel like people you could meet at a medieval market. In 'The Canterbury Tales' the Prioress is all softness and ceremony: delicate speech, an emphasis on manners and little affectations (her French, her forehead, the tender way she feeds her little dog). She performs piety in a courtly, almost theatrical way — sentimental, genteel, and careful about appearances. Her emotional displays (the tears for a small dog, the brooch reading 'Amor vincit omnia') suggest a heart tuned to courtly love and display rather than strict monastic humility.

By contrast, the Monk bursts with rebellious energy against monastic rules. He loves hunting, fine horses, rich clothes; he’s practical, sensual, and modern in his tastes. Where the Prioress clings to surface refinements that mimic nobility, the Monk openly rejects cloistered austerity and embraces worldly pleasures. Chaucer uses both to nudge at clerical hypocrisy: they’re different flavors of devotion and deviation. I find the contrast vivid because it shows how outward signs — weeping, speech, dress — can mean opposite things: one hiding emptiness with sweetness, the other flaunting a break with tradition with brash honesty. That makes them memorable and quietly funny to me.

Who Wrote The Canterbury Tales Featuring The Monk?

3 Answers2025-08-03 14:40:51

I’ve always been fascinated by medieval literature, and 'The Canterbury Tales' is one of those timeless classics that never gets old. The Monk’s tale is just one of the many colorful stories in this collection, and it was written by none other than Geoffrey Chaucer. He’s often called the father of English literature, and for good reason. His work captures the essence of 14th-century England with a mix of humor, satire, and deep insight into human nature. The Monk’s character is particularly interesting because he’s supposed to be pious but ends up being more worldly than you’d expect. Chaucer’s knack for irony shines through here, making the tales as relevant today as they were back then.

Are There Movie Adaptations Of The Canterbury Tales The Monk?

3 Answers2025-08-03 06:49:06

I've been obsessed with medieval literature since college, and 'The Canterbury Tales' is one of my favorites. The Monk's Tale is a collection of tragic stories, but it hasn't gotten a standalone movie adaptation. The closest thing is the 1972 film 'The Canterbury Tales' by Pier Paolo Pasolini, which adapts several tales in a raunchy, comedic style. The Monk's story isn't the focus, though. There's also the 1989 animated version 'Canterbury Tales,' but it skips the Monk entirely. If you want his tales, you might have better luck with audiobooks or YouTube readings. It's surprising how few adaptations exist for such a classic work.

Which Publishers Released The Canterbury Tales With The Monk?

3 Answers2025-08-03 12:44:22

I've been collecting classic literature for years, and 'The Canterbury Tales' is one of my favorites. The Monk's tale is included in most major editions, but some standout publishers include Penguin Classics, which offers a well-annotated version edited by Jill Mann. Oxford University Press also released a scholarly edition with extensive notes, perfect for students. If you prefer a more visually appealing version, the Folio Society's illustrated edition is gorgeous, though pricier. Norton Critical Editions are great for in-depth analysis, while Everyman's Library provides a sturdy hardcover for casual readers. Each publisher brings something unique to the table, whether it's accessibility, aesthetics, or academic rigor.

What Motivates Canterbury Tales The Monk To Prefer Hunting?

4 Answers2025-09-03 05:11:18

I get a kick out of how Chaucer paints the monk in 'The Canterbury Tales' — he makes him as un-monastic as you can imagine, and the love of hunting explains a lot. To me it’s not just a hobby: hunting stands in for an appetite for freedom, physical pleasure, and the world outside the cloister. The monk’s fancy horses, his greyhounds, his embroidered sleeves — all of that screams someone who prefers the open chase to quiet devotion.

Reading the portrait, I keep thinking about medieval expectations versus lived reality. Monastic rules, like the Rule of St. Benedict, praised prayer and work, not chasing deer. So when the narrator shows the monk swapping cassock-like humility for hunting gear, it’s both a character trait and a jab from Chaucer. That tension — between idealised religious life and human desire for status, sport, and comfort — is what makes the monk feel alive to me, and a little comic too.

How Does Canterbury Tales The Monk Criticize Church Corruption?

4 Answers2025-09-03 07:11:22

Whenever I go back to 'The Canterbury Tales', the Monk jumps out at me as a deliciously sharp piece of satire—Chaucer uses him to skewer church corruption by showing the gap between ideal and reality. I like to picture the Monk not as a sermon-giver but as a small parade of contradictions: he boasts of hunting, fine horses, fur-lined sleeves and a love for material comforts, all things directly opposed to the Rule of St. Benedict that monks were supposed to follow.

Chaucer doesn't lecture; he shows. The narrator’s seemingly approving catalog of the Monk’s luxuries is actually ironic—those details expose institutional hypocrisy. By giving the Monk worldly tastes and a contempt for 'stale' traditions, Chaucer hints that monastic houses had drifted into wealth, landholding, and leisure, all signs of corruption. The Monk’s behavior becomes a miniature case study of broader clerical decadence: secular pursuits disguised by religious title, a loss of spiritual purpose, and the normalization of comfort over devotion. Reading his portrait next to other clerics in the pilgrimage makes the pattern unmistakable, and that's where the critique really lands on me.

How Does Canterbury Tales The Monk Reflect Medieval Secularism?

4 Answers2025-09-03 12:29:52

Whenever I dive into 'The Canterbury Tales' and land on 'The Monk,' I feel like I'm watching someone who took monastic vows as a costume and then forgot the script. Chaucer paints him with little flags of worldly living: fine clothes, a love of hunting, and a general contempt for the old monastic Rule. That contrast is exactly where medieval secularism shows up — not as a modern ideology, but as a lived tension between spiritual ideals and social reality. The monk's priorities are courtly and aristocratic rather than ascetic, which tells you a lot about how lay culture and noble tastes had seeped into religious life by Chaucer's day.

I also think Chaucer is gently satirical here. The monk isn't an outlier so much as a symptom. Wealth, landholding, and patronage meant many monasteries were tied to secular power; clerics could be land managers and social climbers rather than hermits. So when I read his description now, it feels like a snapshot of the medieval church's slow drift toward worldly concerns — a precursor to the criticisms that later fueled reform movements. It leaves me curious about how people then reconciled faith with the demands of status and income.

How Does Chaucer Contrast The Canterbury Tales The Friar And Monk?

4 Answers2025-09-06 14:56:02

When I read Chaucer's portraits in 'The Canterbury Tales' I keep getting struck by how playful and precise his satire is. The Monk and the Friar are both churchmen on paper, but Chaucer paints them as two totally different flavors of clerical corruption. The Monk is described with almost aristocratic gusto: lavish clothes, hunting hobbies, and a taste for expensive horses and greyhounds. Chaucer gives him the language of leisure—he treats monastic rules like an old book on a shelf, dusted off but ignored. In short, the Monk turns outward toward the pleasures of the world, preferring the chase to contemplation.

By contrast, the Friar is all social gloss. Chaucer characterizes him as a savvy broker of favors and confessions, the kind of man who charms widows, arranges marriages, and knows the best taverns. His begging license becomes a business model: he’s a community operator who trades spiritual services for worldly perks. The sharp contrast is theatrical—the Monk’s luxury looks like escapism, the Friar’s friendliness like professional opportunism. Chaucer uses costume, behavior, and ironic narration to make both figures memorable, and through them he skewers institutional weaknesses while still hinting at human complexity. I always end up smiling at how easily Chaucer makes a moral critique feel like gossip told over wine.