Absolutely. Give me a protagonist with her own goals any day. So many romances just slot the heroine into a reactive role, waiting for the plot—or the billionaire—to happen to her. I'm much more engaged when she's got her own thing going on, and the romance becomes this complex layer she has to navigate, not her entire purpose.
One that nailed this recently is 'The Dead Romantics' by Ashley Poston. Florence is a ghostwriter for a famous romance author, dealing with a major career crisis and family stuff, all while being hilariously, stubbornly closed-off to love because of past heartbreak. The romantic lead is great, but the core of the book is really her relationship with her family, her grief, and reclaiming her own voice. The romance fits into her journey, not the other way around.
For a different flavor, the 'Kate Daniels' series by Ilona Andrews is a staple. Urban fantasy, but the romance with Curran is legendary precisely because Kate is a lethal, smart-mouthed mercenary first. Their dynamic is all about clashing wills and equals finding a balance of power, not submission. She saves him as often as he saves her, and she'd definitely choose saving the city over a date night if it came down to it.