LOGIN
-ADRIAN POV-
I've built my career on the principle that control is everything.
It's the only thing that separates the people who succeed from the people who get swept away by circumstance and emotion. Control is knowing exactly what will happen before it happens. Control is building systems that work regardless of external chaos. Control is keeping the world at arm's length so nothing can touch what I've carefully constructed.
And I'm very, very good at control.
Which is why the assignment Marcus just handed me is simultaneously the most strategic opportunity of my career and the most genuinely irritating thing that's happened to me in months.
"The Westbrook pharmaceutical account," Marcus said, sliding the folder across his desk. "Major rebranding initiative. They want new strategy, new creative direction, new messaging. Fresh perspective on an established brand. Fifty-thousand-dollar retainer. If we nail this, they're talking year-long contract."
"I can do this," I said immediately. Strategy is my specialty. Market analysis, competitive positioning, identifying white space in brand perception—I could do this in my sleep.
"I know you can," Marcus said. "Which is why you're heading it up. But they specifically requested a collaborative approach. They want strategy and creative working together from day one, not sequential. They want the vision built from both directions simultaneously."
That's when the irritation started. Simultaneous strategy-and-creative collaboration is a disaster waiting to happen. Creative people are emotional. They operate on instinct. They make decisions based on feeling rather than data. They're chaos.
"I'll manage it," I said, which was my way of saying I would contain the chaos and make sure the creative person understood that strategy is the foundation everything else is built on.
"I'm putting you with Eli," Marcus said.
And that's when I actually looked at his face closely enough to see he was slightly amused by whatever reaction was about to cross mine.
Eli.
I knew who Eli was because he'd been at the firm for about eighteen months. Young, probably late twenties. Moderately talented but unfocused. Came up with creative concepts that were occasionally brilliant and mostly frustratingly emotional. Had a tendency to argue with strategy people about whether "data" was really the most important thing when people were making decisions based on emotion anyway.
He was the opposite of what I needed for this project.
"There's no one else?" I asked, which was a legitimate question and not at all a reflection of my immediate, visceral reaction to the idea of spending the next six to eight weeks working closely with someone who viewed control as a limitation rather than a necessary structure.
"He's the strongest creative we have," Marcus said. "And honestly, you two have complementary blind spots. You see strategy everywhere. He sees story everywhere. Westbrook needs both."
"Westbrook needs the strategy more," I said. "The story follows the strategy."
"That's where you're wrong," Marcus said, and he was leaning back in his chair in that way he does when he's about to say something I won't like but that's probably true. "Westbrook needs the story first. People don't remember data. They remember how something makes them feel. Eli makes people feel. You make people think. Together, you make people believe."
I hate when Marcus is right.
"When does the project start?" I asked, already mentally organizing how I would structure this to minimize the chaos that would inevitably come from working with someone as undisciplined as Eli.
"Monday," Marcus said. "Initial client briefing, then the two of you start building the framework."
That gave me a weekend to prepare. To build my strategy for managing this partnership. To establish clear boundaries and hierarchies and decision-making protocols so that when Eli inevitably wanted to pursue some emotionally compelling creative direction that had no market viability, I could shut it down with data and framework.
I left Marcus's office with the folder and a plan. This was going to be fine. I was going to take control of the situation, establish the parameters, and deliver a breakthrough campaign that would build my portfolio and secure my position as the firm's top strategic mind.
The fact that I would have to spend significant time in close proximity to someone who made me vaguely uncomfortable for reasons I wasn't entirely clear about was irrelevant.
Monday morning, I arrived at the conference room fifteen minutes early. This is my standard practice—establish presence, set the tone, own the space before anyone else arrives.
The Westbrook brief was thorough. Established pharmaceutical company, declining market share, internal perception problems. They needed to reposition their brand not just as effective but as human. As understanding. As caring about patients rather than just medication.
It was actually a solid brief. There was real strategy to build here.
Then Eli walked in.
I'd seen him around the office before—you can't work in a place for five minutes without encountering most of the people there. But I hadn't really looked at him. Hadn't been paying that kind of attention.
I was paying it now.
He was probably around my age, mid-thirties, with the kind of face that suggested he spent more time thinking about ideas than maintaining a careful professional appearance. His hair was slightly too long. His clothes fit in a way that suggested he'd gotten dressed without considering whether they coordinated. There was something about him that suggested he operated on a completely different frequency than the rest of the world.
"Adrian," he said, extending his hand. "I've heard you're excellent at strategy."
There was something in his tone. Not quite mocking, but not entirely sincere either. Like he was testing to see if I would take the compliment at face value or read the implicit critique underneath—that strategy is fine but incomplete.
I shook his hand. His grip was confident. His eyes were intelligent in a way that was irritating.
"And I've heard you're occasionally creative," I said, which was deliberately cool and set the terms immediately: I was the lead here, and he was supporting infrastructure.
He smiled at that. Actually smiled. Like I'd said something funny instead of establishing hierarchy.
"I am," he said. "The question is whether your strategy can handle it when I am."
That's when I should have recognized that this was going to be a problem.
Not the strategy-creative collaboration problem that Marcus had set up. But a different kind of problem entirely.
But I didn't recognize it. I was too busy maintaining control. Too busy thinking about frameworks and decision-making hierarchies and how I was going to manage someone who clearly thought emotion was a viable substitute for analysis.
The client presented their brand challenge. We took notes. We asked clarifying questions. I was building my mental model of the market space, identifying the white-space opportunity, structuring the approach.
And I was acutely aware of Eli sitting next to me, taking notes in a way that suggested he was listening to something entirely different than what I was hearing. He was hearing the client's fear. The emotional underpinning of the brief. The human need underneath the business problem.
Which would have been useful if it wasn't also completely impractical.
"We should get to the creative brainstorm," Eli said after the client had finished. "I want to understand the emotional problem before we spend time on strategy."
"The emotional problem," I said carefully, "stems from the strategic positioning problem. Fix the positioning and the emotions follow."
"That's not how people work," Eli said, and he turned to look at me directly. "People feel first. They rationalize second. You can build the perfect strategy and if it doesn't connect emotionally, nobody cares."
"People care about effectiveness," I said. "They care about data that proves the product works. Everything else is secondary."
Eli leaned back in his chair and looked at me like I'd just said something that revealed a fundamental misunderstanding of human nature.
"We're going to have a very interesting collaboration," he said.
And that should have been my warning. That tone. That look. The absolute certainty that he saw something I was missing.
But I was too busy maintaining control to notice that I was about to lose it completely.
"We'll establish the strategic framework first," I said, making the decision unilaterally. "Once we have that foundation, you can layer in the creative. But the strategy is the foundation."
Eli nodded slowly, like he was considering arguing but had decided I wasn't worth the effort.
"Whatever you think is best," he said, and his tone suggested he thought my approach was fundamentally misguided but he was willing to let me fail on my own terms.
I spent the rest of the meeting establishing the project structure, the timeline, and the decision-making framework. All very clear. All very organized. All designed to give me maximum control and minimum chaos.
By the end of the day, I had a detailed project plan, a competitive analysis framework, and absolutely no idea that I'd just been assigned to work closely with the one person in the entire firm who would eventually make my careful system of control completely irrelevant.
If I'd known that, I would have requested reassignment.
Or maybe I'm lying to myself.
Maybe part of me, the part that had already started noticing the way Eli moved through the conference room, the particular quality of his attention when he was thinking, the exact moment he'd decided that my approach was interesting in a way that suggested he might eventually prove me wrong—maybe that part of me wanted exactly this situation.
Wanted the challenge of someone who couldn't be controlled or categorized or managed.
Wanted, despite every logical part of my brain screaming against it, to find out if there was something underneath my careful control that was worth risking everything for.
But I didn't acknowledge that. Not yet. I was still in control mode, still believing that I could manage this.
Still believing that I could keep Eli at a professional distance and compartmentalize whatever this response was to him into something manageable.
I was going to be very wrong about that.
The Westbrook campaign reached its production peak in the third week.We had eight patient stories completed. The media buy was finalized. The strategic rollout schedule was locked. Everything we'd built was coming together into something that felt genuinely breakthrough-level.And I was increasingly unable to separate my professional experience of Eli from my personal experience of him.We were in a constant state of collaboration. Production reviews. Strategy refinement. Client updates. Media placement discussions. All of it required us to be in close proximity, sharing screens, discussing creative details, making rapid decisions that only worked because we'd developed a kind of shorthand with each other.The attraction was becoming background noise—still present, but something I'd integrated into the working dynamic rather than something I was fighting against.Until Wednesday afternoon, when everything shifted.We were reviewing final media placement options. Eli was sitting close
By the second week, I was noticing things about Eli that had nothing to do with professional collaboration.The way he moved his hands when he was explaining a concept he was passionate about. The particular quality of his silence when he was thinking deeply. The curve of his neck when he leaned over laptop screens to review footage.These observations were not helpful. They were actively detrimental to my ability to maintain professional boundaries.The problem was that noticing these things made it impossible to dismiss him as just a creative person I was collaborating with. He was becoming a person. A complicated, brilliant, infuriatingly compassionate person who was systematically dismantling my carefully constructed understanding of myself."You're staring," Eli said without looking up from his laptop during our Monday morning production review."I'm not," I said, which was a lie. I was definitely staring. I'd been staring for approximately forty-five seconds while watching him m
The first week of actual campaign execution was controlled chaos.We had the Westbrook team demanding updates. We had our internal production team asking clarifying questions about resource allocation. We had a ticking clock and the weight of a six-figure contract hanging over every decision.Eli was handling the casting for the authentic patient stories. I was handling the media production framework and the strategic positioning rollout.We were supposed to be operating in parallel. Instead, I kept noticing that I was waiting for his input before finalizing decisions. Not because I needed his permission, but because what he thought actually mattered to the outcome.This was new.The problem surfaced on a Thursday afternoon.The production team had filmed the first authentic patient story—a woman talking about her experience with chronic pain, her fear about medication, her journey to trusting Westbrook. It was raw. It was emotional. It was absolutely not what I had expected when I'd
The problem with Eli's approach is that he made it impossible to dismiss him as just a creative person with impractical ideas.By Wednesday, he'd articulated his emotional storytelling framework with enough structure that I couldn't argue it was completely unstrategic. It still prioritized authenticity over control, but he'd built a compelling case for why that wasn't actually a weakness—it was a different kind of strength.Which meant I had to rebuild my dismissal of him. And I wasn't sure I wanted to."Here's my concern," I said in our working session, pulling up market research. "Emotional authenticity is inconsistent. It depends on who's telling the story, the quality of the casting, the production values, the media placement. You can't control all those variables.""That's the entire point," Eli said, and he was frustratingly patient. "You can't control them. But you can influence them. You can create conditions where authenticity is more likely to emerge.""That's not a strategy
The Westbrook strategic briefing room became our second office by Tuesday.I'd laid out my market analysis across three whiteboards: competitive positioning, market gaps, consumer pain points, demographic breakdowns. Everything quantified. Everything structured. Everything pointing to a clear strategic direction: position Westbrook not as another pharmaceutical option but as the humane choice in healthcare.It was solid work. Defensible work. The kind of work that would win pitches and deliver results.Eli walked in, looked at the whiteboards, and didn't say anything for a full minute. He just stood there, studying my framework like he was reading something I hadn't actually written."This is good," he finally said, which should have been satisfying but somehow felt like he was about to follow it with a "but.""But?" I said, because I know how people work, and the tone in his voice suggested there absolutely was a but."But you're missing the story," he said, turning to look at me. "Y
-ADRIAN POV-I've built my career on the principle that control is everything.It's the only thing that separates the people who succeed from the people who get swept away by circumstance and emotion. Control is knowing exactly what will happen before it happens. Control is building systems that work regardless of external chaos. Control is keeping the world at arm's length so nothing can touch what I've carefully constructed.And I'm very, very good at control.Which is why the assignment Marcus just handed me is simultaneously the most strategic opportunity of my career and the most genuinely irritating thing that's happened to me in months."The Westbrook pharmaceutical account," Marcus said, sliding the folder across his desk. "Major rebranding initiative. They want new strategy, new creative direction, new messaging. Fresh perspective on an established brand. Fifty-thousand-dollar retainer. If we nail this, they're talking year-long contract.""I can do this," I said immediately.







