February of the fourth year brought a letter from a man Ernest had not thought about in two years.The man's name was Charles Tennant, and he had been, during the years of the marriage, one of Ernest's closer professional acquaintances — not a friend in the full sense, Ernest had not had many of those, but someone with whom he had regularly shared dinners and industry events and the kind of conversation that was more substantive than networking but less personal than friendship. Charles had known both of them. Had attended the wedding.After the divorce, Charles had continued his acquaintance with Ernest with the careful neutrality of someone who had decided to maintain a relationship with both parties and had therefore — inevitably — become less fully available to either. Ernest had not registered this as a loss at the time. He registered it now, reading Charles's letter, as information about how the divorce had been received in the world beyond the two of them: quietly, with the dip
آخر تحديث : 2026-05-03 اقرأ المزيد