9 Jawaban2025-06-03
The translation by Michael R. Katz of the novel by Dostoevsky is called The Devils and I think this title is very significant. Demons connotes some sort of internal, perhaps even spiritual force, whereas The Devils implies a number of external, almost person-like forces of evil roaming around in society and corrupting it. In other words, The Devils is a far more politically charged novel than Demons and certainly less of a psychological study of the illness of Russia than the latter novel. My emphasis here is on the historical and polemical aspects of the novel and so by choosing a translation, one is also choosing to view the novel through a somewhat subtle but distinctive interpretive lens even as one reads the title of the novel. Does one see the evil in the novel as some sort of disease of the soul of Russia (Demons) or as a group of rather malicious individuals (The Devils)? Both readings are certainly possible in the novel and are supported by it.
8 Jawaban2025-07-13
It’s interesting that no one has brought up the Constance Garnett translation of “Crime and Punishment” yet. While her translation is historical and oft-reprinted, reading it after P&V is like watching a movie with the contrast cranked down low. The rough edges of Garnett’s translation have all been smoothed over to make Dostoevsky’s work read like that of a slightly more agitated Jane Austen. But Dostoevsky isn’t Austen. He’s a tough, uncomfortable, and repetitive writer who dives deep into the psychological inner lives of his characters to expose their inner conflicts and psychological fears. The P&V translation has somehow managed to resurrect all of the edgey and uncomfortable aspects of Dostoevsky’s novel for English-speaking readers. While it’s true that some of the translations are a bit awkward, it’s sort of necessary in order to accurately portray the main character, Raskolnikov, as well as the dirty, sick, and oppressive city in which he lives. If you want to read a smooth and pleasant classic, then read something else. But “Crime and Punishment” is not for the faint of heart, and you’ll need a translation that isn’t afraid of the novel’s mess.
6 Jawaban2025-08-31
I must acknowledge that the P&V marketing machine is very good at what it does. So, you’ll find them on the cover of most classic sections in bookstores, and they are often good. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are the best translation of a given work, and therefore, other very good translations are dismissed solely on the basis of-store front hype.
And it creates a fascinating (and totally unfair) situation in which to laud Garnett or another translator one instantly appears to be a snarky, overhyping hipster contrarian challenging the givens of mass marketing. P&V is, for many, often the only good option, for specific books, however, another translator might be offering a far more suitable translation than P&V’s. Ultimately, one serves Dostoevsky, not the translator or publishing brand.
2 Jawaban2025-05-22
For free comic PDF editing I rely on GIMP for image layers (covering up original text with translation boxes) and Foxit Reader for annotation and adding new text. Very hacky, but it works. One thing to keep in mind when creating text layers to print out scaled up fan copies is to set the font size of the text layer 10% larger than the original comic book text.
10 Jawaban2025-06-07
I don’t get the translation debates for this book. The copy of Dr. Zhivago I read was a used book from my local used bookstore. It was the original 1958 translation by Max Hayward and Manya Harari. I had no problems with the translation. The book is a powerful story with hard characters and it’s a classic. I don’t think that there is overcompensation with translation of this book. Just find a decently reviewed copy and read it. The core of the book is so strong that it shines through.
12 Jawaban2026-07-29
There is a special case with Nietzsche’s notes and unfinished fragments, compiled under the title The Will to Power by his sister Elisabeth Forster-Nietzsche with often unbearable editorial bias, even Nazi bias. The Kaufmann and Hollingdale translation of The Will to Power includes critical comments on this score. Naturally, one must read this material with extreme caution, bearing in mind that it is not a book by Nietzsche. Translation of these notes requires a huge disclaimer; in fact, one should avoid all editions which present The Will to Power as a single, cohesive work by Nietzsche.
5 Jawaban2025-11-27
It is also important to remember that any given translation is a product of a particular cultural moment in history. When Lady Charlotte Guest was working on The Mabinogion in the Victorian era she was not simply translating texts but also drawing upon her own experiences of and responses to the Romantic era, and the nationalism of the Victorians with their growing interest in the ‘Celtic’. Jones & Jones’ translation was published in the post-war era, and reveals a mid-20th century scholarness, particularly in terms of academic method. And Sioned Davies’ translations are of the 21st century, seeking to provide readers with access to the stories, an appreciation of the narrative, and an insight into the oral nature of the texts as they were passed from mouth to mouth in medieval Wales. Reading Guest’s translation of The Mabinogion is not simply reading The Mabinogion, it is also reading about the Victorian’s fascination with all things ‘Celtic’. We have to ask ourselves whether we want a translation that seeks to be timeless, or whether we are interested in reading about the historical reception of these stories as well as the stories themselves.
4 Jawaban2025-09-21
I know of few books more mysterious, more intriguing and, yes, more eerie than The Trial, another exceptionally excellent Kafka short story. And much different from, say, Metamorphosis or The Hunger Artist, as those two other exceptional short stories by the excellent Kafka are primarily about a person’s transformation and lonely isolation, and here we are immersed in the very strange, too-often confounding, alien society itself, which this book portraits with utmost skill and depth. And the so-hard-to-surmount, virtually faceless, impersonal (and often seemingly bureaucracy-ridden) giant of a structure opposed to the book’s good hero is so skilfully drawn and contrasted with the excellent hero, that, like the hero, we poor readers can’t fail to get stuck mightily in this The Trial.
This is as opposed to ‘The Hunger Artist’ which is a story of a man’s personal struggle to maintain his artistic integrity whilst sacrificing his physical health. In contrast ‘The Trial’ draws on our common anxieties with seemingly powerful and incomprehensible systems and how we struggle through bureaucratic labyrinths to reach our goals. What makes ‘The Trial’ so powerful and to me such a deeply impacting book is that is both reflects our own struggles with certain systems and conveys an anxious sense of foreboding and fear that evokes great unease as you finish reading the book and even sometimes later.
9 Jawaban2025-07-16
Just as there are different interpretations of a Beethoven symphony – period-instruments performance, lush orchestral recording from mid-20th century, piano transcription, etc. – all playing the same notes but with a different timbre, tempo and overall ‘feel’ to them, Garnett being the grand, romantic orchestral recording of Beethoven’s work from the mid-20th century, P&V a period-instruments version of Beethoven’s work often jarring but attempting to be historically accurate, McDuff a crisp and clear digital recording of Beethoven’s work, Avsey being a passionate live performance of Beethoven’s work, etc. – none of them are objectively better than the others; they’re all just different interpretations of the work, and which one to go for will depend on what you’re looking for in music and/or prose.
11 Jawaban2025-08-18
I have a sort of contrarian perspective here. The best translations of literature are typically the oldest published versions, from the early part of the 20th century. This is because there is so much of value in the cultural filter of a translator. The translation becomes a sort of historical document of how the literature was perceived and assimilated by the English-speaking world of that era. I have a number of these very old published versions of Dostoevsky, some of which even I wouldn’t recommend to the general reader, for reasons already mentioned, yet they are of enormous value to the literary historian. For the enthusiast of literature with an interest in reception history, the old published versions are the ‘best’ in a totally different, meta sense.