What Makes Good People Do Bad Things Commonlit Answers

Oshun is such an interesting figure! I see her as more of a nuanced character than simply good or bad. She's the goddess of love, fertility, and rivers in Yoruba mythology, often bringing joy and prosperity. However, she can also show her fierce side when disrespected. That duality creates a rich tapestry of stories about her. Overall, I think her goodness shines through, as she embodies compassion and strength, but she can definitely hold her own when necessary.

Bad fantasy novels often feel like someone dumped a dictionary of tropes into a blender and hit puree without adding any flavor. The worst offenders have cardboard-cutout characters who exist just to move the plot forward—like the Chosen One with zero personality or the villain who monologues about darkness. These stories rely on tired clichés instead of fresh ideas, making everything predictable. It's like eating plain oatmeal when you were promised a feast. World-building is another common pitfall. Some authors throw in random magical rules or creatures without consistency, breaking their own logic. A dragon that breathes fire in chapter one but ice in chapter ten with no explanation? That's lazy writing. Good fantasy makes you believe in its world, even when it's full of magic. Bad fantasy just makes you roll your eyes at the contradictions. The pacing can also kill a fantasy novel. Some drag on with endless descriptions of trees or political intrigue that goes nowhere, while others rush through key moments like they're sprinting to the finish line. I recently read one where the 'epic final battle' lasted two pages—after 500 pages of buildup. It felt like a prank. A bad fantasy novel either forgets to entertain or tries too hard to be 'deep' without earning it.

As someone who devours romance novels like candy, I’ve come across a few tropes and flaws that can ruin an otherwise promising story. One major red flag is poorly developed characters—when the protagonists lack depth or their motivations feel contrived, it’s hard to root for their love. Insta-love is another pet peeve; relationships that go from zero to soulmates in three chapters rarely feel authentic. Another issue is excessive reliance on clichés, like the 'miscommunication trope' where the entire conflict could be resolved with a single honest conversation. Toxic relationships glamorized as 'passionate' also leave a bad taste, especially when unhealthy behaviors are romanticized. Weak world-building in fantasy or historical romances can also break immersion—if the setting feels like an afterthought, the love story loses its magic. Lastly, a lack of emotional stakes makes the romance forgettable; if the characters don’t face real challenges, their happily-ever-after feels unearned.

What makes a good story you ask? Oh, it's a combination of many pastel colors and deep hues, each bringing something unique to the canvas! A tantalizing tale is like a hearty soup, combining a variety of ingredients, each contributing to the overall taste. The perfect fusion of elements like depth plot, engaging characters, twists and suspense, immersive world, tantalizing conflict, and a satisfying resolution makes the reader's heart race, their breath hitch, and eyes stuck on the pages.

As someone who has devoured countless fantasy novels, I believe a great fantasy novel must have a richly imagined world that feels alive. The setting should be immersive, with its own rules, history, and cultures that make sense within the narrative. Magic systems, if present, need to be consistent and well-defined—think 'Mistborn' by Brandon Sanderson, where the laws of Allomancy are meticulously crafted. Characters are another cornerstone. They should be multi-dimensional, with flaws and growth arcs that resonate emotionally. A story like 'The Name of the Wind' by Patrick Rothfuss excels here, with Kvothe’s journey feeling deeply personal yet epic. The plot must balance tension and payoff, weaving twists that feel earned rather than arbitrary. Themes that explore human nature, like in 'The Broken Earth' trilogy by N.K. Jemisin, elevate the genre beyond mere escapism. Lastly, prose matters—whether lyrical like Guy Gavriel Kay’s or brisk like Joe Abercrombie’s, the writing should serve the story.

As someone who’s devoured fantasy books for years, I believe a good fantasy novel needs more than just magic and dragons. It’s about world-building that feels alive—like stepping into 'The Name of the Wind' by Patrick Rothfuss, where every detail, from the currency to the folklore, feels real. The characters must grow, too; think of Vin from 'Mistborn' by Brandon Sanderson, who starts as a street thief and becomes something far greater. A great fantasy book also balances stakes and wonder. 'The Lies of Locke Lamora' by Scott Lynch mixes heist thrills with a rich, gritty setting, while 'The Priory of the Orange Tree' by Samantha Shannon offers epic scale without sacrificing intimacy. Themes matter as well—whether it’s the moral ambiguity in 'The Blade Itself' by Joe Abercrombie or the hope in 'The House in the Cerulean Sea' by TJ Klune. A truly good fantasy book leaves you thinking about its world long after you’ve turned the last page.

A good fantasy book takes you to a world so vivid, you forget reality exists. The magic system needs rules—not just flashy spells—but something that feels real, like in 'Mistborn' where Allomancy is based on consuming metals. The characters must grow; think of Vin’s journey from street thief to heroine. And the stakes? They should make your heart race—whether it’s Sauron’s looming shadow in 'The Lord of the Rings' or the political knives in 'A Song of Ice and Fire'. World-building is key. Tolkien didn’t just write a story; he crafted languages, histories, even songs for Middle-earth. But depth shouldn’t drown pacing. 'The Name of the Wind' balances lore with Kvothe’s gripping tale. Themes matter too—'The Broken Earth' trilogy uses fantasy to explore oppression and resilience. And originality? No recycled elves and dwarves; give me sentient deserts like in 'The Stormlight Archive'. A great fantasy book lingers in your mind like a spell you can’t shake.

A good dystopian novel grabs you by the throat and refuses to let go. It's not just about bleak futures or oppressive regimes—those are just the backdrop. The real magic lies in how it mirrors our own world, twisting familiar realities just enough to make you uncomfortable. Take '1984' or 'The Handmaid's Tale'—they work because they feel eerily plausible, like a distorted reflection of our own society. The best dystopias don’t just predict the future; they hold up a cracked mirror to the present. Characters are everything. If I don’t care about the people struggling in this nightmare world, the whole thing falls flat. Protagonists don’t have to be heroes—they can be flawed, broken, even unlikeable—but they must feel real. Their struggles should make me question what I’d do in their place. The tension between survival and rebellion, compliance and defiance, is where the story comes alive. And the villains? They can’t just be mustache-twirling tyrants. The scariest antagonists are the ones who believe they’re right, like O’Brien in '1984' or the Commanders in 'The Handmaid’s Tale'. Worldbuilding is another make-or-break element. The rules of the dystopia need to be clear but not spoon-fed. I love when details drip-feed through the narrative, letting me piece together how things got so bad. But it can’t feel like a textbook—show me the world through the character’s eyes, like the worn-out shoes of a worker in 'Brave New World' or the empty shelves in 'The Road'. The little things sell the big lies. The best dystopias leave you with a lingering unease. They don’t wrap up neatly with a bow; they haunt you. That’s why 'Never Let Me Go' sticks with me more than any action-packed rebellion story. It’s the quiet horror, the realization that some systems can’t be punched away. A good dystopian novel doesn’t just entertain—it makes you look sideways at the world you live in.