ログイン本棚
検索
Is 'Reasons And Persons' Worth Reading For Philosophy Beginners?
Derek Parfit's book keeps popping up but seems dense. Did anyone else start with his work as a first philosophy read? Looking for honest takes before diving in.
2026-03-26 11:53:20
307
フォロー21
共有
Reading Explorer
Student
診断スタート
11 回答
ベストアンサー
FinnPine
Book Guide
Librarian
It's definitely worth reading, but with some patience. Parfit's writing is precise but dense, so it helps to read a few summaries alongside the chapters to grasp his arguments about personal identity and ethics. For a more direct narrative take on similar themes, I recently got into a sci-fi web novel called 'The Human' that explores the idea of consciousness being transferred into different synthetic bodies, which forces the characters to constantly question what makes them a person. It frames those philosophical puzzles through a tense survival story on a ruined station, so it's engaging while making you think.
2026-07-30 22:25:47
64
Oliver
Story Interpreter
Student
Short take: Yes, but brace yourself. Parfit’s work is like climbing a mountain—grueling, but the view changes everything. Beginners might need to read pages three times, but that’s normal. His ideas on moral impartiality stuck with me way more than easier reads. If you’re curious about philosophy’s big questions, dive in. Just don’t expect it to feel like casual reading.
2026-03-27 06:20:41
12
Penelope
Book Clue Finder
Police Officer
Oh, 'Reasons and Persons'? Look, I’m not a philosophy professor or anything, but I tried reading it after binging some YouTube philosophy videos. It’s like jumping into the deep end without floaties. Parfit’s ideas are fascinating—like how he dismantles the idea of a 'self'—but man, the writing is dry as toast. If you’re a beginner, maybe grab 'Justice' by Sandel first to build up stamina. Still, if you’re stubborn (like me), highlighters and coffee will be your best friends.
2026-03-27 19:24:04
9
Xavier
Expert
Driver
Derek Parfit's 'Reasons and Persons' is a beast of a book, no lie—but that doesn't mean beginners should avoid it entirely. If you're just dipping your toes into philosophy, I'd recommend pairing it with something lighter first, like Nagel's 'What Does It All Mean?' to get comfortable with the style. Parfit dives deep into ethics, personal identity, and rationality, and his arguments are razor-sharp but dense. The section on personal identity alone will make your brain do backflips—it questions whether 'you' are the same person over time in ways that feel almost sci-fi.
That said, if you love a challenge, go for it! Just don't rush. Take notes, reread paragraphs, and maybe join a study group or online forum to unpack it. The payoff is huge: you'll start seeing everyday choices through a wild new lens. I still think about his 'repugnant conclusion' years later—it’s that kind of book.
That said, if you love a challenge, go for it! Just don't rush. Take notes, reread paragraphs, and maybe join a study group or online forum to unpack it. The payoff is huge: you'll start seeing everyday choices through a wild new lens. I still think about his 'repugnant conclusion' years later—it’s that kind of book.
2026-03-29 02:33:34
3
Xavier
Clear Answerer
Nurse
Honestly? It depends how much you hate feeling confused. 'Reasons and Persons' is brilliant, but Parfit assumes you’re already comfy with terms like 'consequentialism' and 'teletransportation paradox.' If those sound like gibberish, start with 'The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten' for fun intro thought experiments. But if you’re itching to tackle heavy stuff—like whether future people matter as much as current ones—this book’s a masterpiece. Just keep Google handy.
2026-03-29 08:09:14
6すべての回答を見る
コードをスキャンしてアプリをダウンロード
関連書籍
A Good book
martinzjjaaa
0
3.6K
0
3.6K
a really good book for you. I hope you like it becuase it tells you a good story. Please read it.
今すぐ読むLove, Lessons, and Late Blossoms
Crankyswan
0
911
0
911
In the chaos and quiet of her 30s, a woman reflects on the loves that shaped her, the heartbreaks that undid her, and the tender spaces in between. Through fleeting romances, almost-loves, and the weight of expectations—family’s, society’s, and her own—she navigates a world where connection is currency, vulnerability is rebellion, and self-discovery never comes easy.
Told with wit, warmth, and raw honesty, this novel is a journey through modern love: messy, magical, and sometimes maddening. It's about the people who entered her life, the ones who left, and the version of herself she’s still becoming.
今すぐ読むAccidental Bibliophiles
Epicfield
10
1.0K
10
1.0K
Everette and Jack know next to nothing about romance novels.... or women. So when they accidentally join a book club full of both, they have no idea what to think. But, as the book and time goes on, the ladies in their book club become more interested in a different plot. The love lives of both men.
今すぐ読むThe Man Who Forgot How to Feel
Maren Shallow
10
1.0K
10
1.0K
Anthony Seymour couldn't wrap his mind around it.
He was the one who'd saved them. And yet, in the end, they kept pushing him away. They toyed with him using false confessions, treated him as someone else's stand-in, and left him gravely injured.
He never got so much as a scrap of the good fortune he deserved. Instead, after one emotional wound too many, he developed a disorder that stripped away his ability to feel, and little by little, he lost all attachment to the world.
Then, one day, Anthony made a decision.
He would end his life, and when he did, he'd use his own organs to save seven others. That would be his final goodbye to the world.
From that day on, he began searching for strangers who needed help, using death as his purpose and his method of choosing who to save.
But once word got out, the very women who'd once hurt him came flooding back, begging him through tears not to die.
Anthony, who'd already lost every last one of his emotions, only found it puzzling.
After everything that had happened, he wondered—what were they even crying for?
今すぐ読むA Soul Without Shore
June Moon
0
3.9K
0
3.9K
I lose my memory and wander the streets, surviving on scraps and the kindness of strangers.
Then, Miles Blackwood from the Institute of Medical Research finds me and takes me in. He tells me that I'm his long-lost fiancee who ran away years ago, and that he's spent every ounce of energy searching for me ever since.
As I'm frail and riddled with illness, he watches over me as I take my medication every day, tracing the scar on my lower back with a strange, tender affection.
But everything shatters the day I regain my memory.
I accidentally overhear Miles speaking to a friend.
"Miles, you forcibly removed Cassidy's kidney for Claudia back then. That was what caused her to lose her memories. And in the end, you let Claudia take all the credit for the research.
"Now, after Cassidy's been suffering out there for years, you're bringing her back just to use her for the artificial kidney project? Aren't you worried that she'll regain her memories?"
Miles scoffs.
"She's incredibly grateful to me now. Besides, she's just a sickly woman. So what if she finds out? As long as we succeed in the research on artificial kidneys, Claudia will become the star of the medical world. As for Cassidy? She'll have made her contribution to the medical field."
A cold chill rushes through me in an instant—I am Cassidy.
今すぐ読むTHE THING INSIDE YOUR HEAD (#TIME GODS SERIES)
Salvin Sawyerr
10
4.4K
10
4.4K
This book is a must-read for teenagers. It brings out the emotional and physical countenances of most teenagers, in verisimilitude.
Anderson Simpson and his friend, Harrison Edgeton, are in for an adventure that would blow your mind.
They discovered things about themselves that they never knew or understood, when they went back through time, with the help of an old Time Machine of “The Time Gods"
今すぐ読む関連質問
Is Introduction to Philosophy worth reading for beginners?
3 回答2026-03-22 16:30:44
Philosophy can feel intimidating at first, like staring at a mountain you’re not sure how to climb. But 'Introduction to Philosophy' is one of those books that hands you a map and a flashlight—suddenly, the path doesn’t seem so steep. I picked it up on a whim during college, expecting dense jargon, but was surprised by how approachable it was. The way it breaks down big ideas—from Socrates to existentialism—into digestible chunks made me feel like I was having a conversation, not sitting through a lecture.
What really stuck with me was how it framed questions I’d already been asking unconsciously. Like, why do we care about morality? Is free will real? The book doesn’t just dump answers; it walks you through how different thinkers approached these puzzles, which made me appreciate the process as much as the conclusions. By the end, I was scribbling notes in the margins like it was a personal diary. If you’re even slightly curious about why humans think the way we do, this might be the perfect gateway.
Is 'Readings in the Philosophy of Moses Maimonides' worth reading for beginners?
3 回答2025-12-31 03:43:05
Maimonides' work is dense, no doubt, but there's a certain magic in wrestling with his ideas even as a beginner. I stumbled upon 'Readings in the Philosophy of Moses Maimonides' during a phase where I was obsessed with medieval thought, and while some passages felt like deciphering hieroglyphics, the payoff was incredible. His blend of Aristotelian logic and Jewish theology creates this unique bridge between faith and reason. If you're patient and willing to reread paragraphs (maybe with a companion guide or online lecture), the book becomes a gateway to understanding how philosophy shaped religious discourse. It's like peeling an onion—each layer reveals something sharper but more profound.
That said, I wouldn't recommend diving in unprepared. Skimming secondary sources about Maimonides' life or the 'Guide for the Perplexed' first helps contextualize the excerpts. The language is archaic, and the concepts assume some familiarity with terms like 'Prime Mover' or 'negative theology.' But if you enjoy feeling your brain stretch, this collection offers glimpses into a mind that debated eternity, prophecy, and ethics with razor precision. My copy is full of sticky notes and frustrated scribbles—proof it made me think harder than most modern books.
Is Philosophy of the Human Person worth reading?
3 回答2026-01-06 16:18:00
Philosophy has always been this vast, intimidating ocean to me, but 'Philosophy of the Human Person' felt like a gentle paddleboard ride across its surface—accessible yet profound. The way it dissects consciousness, identity, and our place in the universe made me pause mid-page more times than I can count. It’s not just about abstract ideas; it ties them to everyday struggles, like why we crave connection or how we define purpose. I dog-eared so many pages debating free will versus determinism that my copy looks like a hedgehog now.
What really stuck with me was its exploration of suffering. It doesn’t offer cheap comfort but reframes pain as part of what makes us human. After reading, I caught myself staring at strangers on the subway, wondering about their inner worlds—something no textbook has ever made me do. The book’s quiet power lies in how it lingers; months later, I’m still chewing over its questions like mental gum.
Is Ethics Introduced worth reading for philosophy beginners?
4 回答2026-03-07 13:54:04
I picked up 'Ethics Introduced' on a whim after seeing it recommended in a philosophy subreddit, and honestly, it felt like stumbling into a cozy conversation with a patient teacher. The way it breaks down complex ideas—like Kant’s categorical imperative or utilitarianism—into digestible anecdotes is brilliant. It doesn’t drown you in jargon; instead, it uses everyday scenarios, like deciding whether to lie to protect a friend, to illustrate theories.
What really stood out was the chapter on virtue ethics, where the author compares Aristotle’s 'golden mean' to modern self-help trends. It made me realize how much ancient philosophy still shapes our thinking. For beginners, it’s a gentle ramp into deeper waters, though I’d pair it with something like 'Sophie’s World' for a broader historical context. By the end, I was scribbling notes in the margins like a midterm cram session—but in the best way possible.
Is Critique of Pure Reason worth reading for beginners?
3 回答2026-01-09 04:36:24
Philosophy can feel like scaling a mountain blindfolded, and Kant’s 'Critique of Pure Reason' is Everest. I tried tackling it fresh out of high school, armed with nothing but enthusiasm—big mistake. The density of his prose, the labyrinthine arguments about synthetic a priori judgments… it’s like being handed a calculus textbook before learning addition. But here’s the thing: if you prepare, it’s transformative. I revisited it after reading secondary guides like Roger Scruton’s 'Kant: A Very Short Introduction,' and suddenly, the fog lifted. Kant’s ideas about how perception shapes reality rewired my brain.
For beginners, I’d say: don’t dive headfirst. Start with podcasts or YouTube lectures (Wireless Philosophy’s Kant series is gold). Treat it like a puzzle—piece together concepts gradually. And skip the Preface; it’s a notorious trap. The payoff? Understanding modern philosophy without Kant is like trying to explain gravity without Newton. Just pack climbing gear.
Is Attacking Faulty Reasoning worth reading for beginners?
3 回答2026-01-06 09:46:52
I picked up 'Attacking Faulty Reasoning' on a whim after seeing it recommended in a forum debate, and it completely changed how I approach arguments—both in books and real life. For beginners, it’s like getting a toolkit for dismantling bad logic, but it doesn’t feel like a dry textbook. The author breaks down fallacies with examples that stick, like comparing 'slippery slope' arguments to actual banana-peel comedy skids. It’s accessible, but don’t expect fluff; you’ll need to chew on some concepts. That said, if you’re into critical thinking or just want to spot plot holes in 'Sherlock' faster, it’s a gem.
What surprised me was how often I started noticing these flaws in everyday stuff—political tweets, anime rivalries ('You lost because you’re weak!'—classic ad hominem), even my own rants. It’s not about winning debates but understanding why some arguments crumble. If you’re new to logic, pair it with something lighter like 'The Demon-Haunted World' for balance. The book’s a bit old-school, but hey, bad reasoning never goes out of style.
Is Being and Time suitable for beginner philosophy readers?
3 回答2026-01-26 14:13:47
Reading 'Being and Time' as a beginner in philosophy is like trying to climb Mount Everest in flip-flops—possible, but boy, will you struggle! Heidegger’s masterpiece is dense, packed with jargon like 'Dasein' and 'thrownness,' and it assumes you’re already familiar with phenomenology and existentialism. I tried tackling it early in my philosophy journey and spent more time googling terms than actually reading.
That said, if you’re dead-set on it, pair it with secondary sources like Hubert Dreyfus’s 'Being-in-the-World' or lecture series on YouTube. Start with simpler existential works—Camus’ 'The Myth of Sisyphus' or Sartre’s 'Existentialism Is a Humanism'—to build a foundation. 'Being and Time' is rewarding, but it’s a marathon, not a sprint.
Are there books similar to 'Reasons and Persons' in ethical theory?
5 回答2026-03-26 23:59:06
Oh, diving into 'Reasons and Persons' feels like wrestling with a philosophical octopus—every tentacle is a new paradox! If you're craving more brain-twisters, Derek Parfit’s own 'On What Matters' digs deeper into normative ethics and rationality, though it’s denser than a black hole. Peter Singer’s 'Practical Ethics' is another gem, blending utilitarianism with real-world dilemmas in a way that’ll make you question every life choice. For something with a narrative twist, Nagel’s 'The View from Nowhere' explores objectivity vs. subjectivity in ethics, though it’s less about personal identity than Parfit. And if you want sheer audacity, try Korsgaard’s 'The Sources of Normativity'—her Kantian take feels like a high-stakes debate with Parfit himself.
Honestly, after these, even grocery shopping feels like an ethical minefield.
What is the main argument in 'Reasons and Persons'?
5 回答2026-03-26 08:42:27
Derek Parfit's 'Reasons and Persons' is a philosophical heavyweight—it reshaped how I think about identity, ethics, and time. The core argument revolves around personal identity not being as concrete as we assume. Parfit uses thought experiments like teleportation or split-brain scenarios to argue that what matters isn't some unchanging 'self,' but psychological continuity. If my memories and desires gradually transfer to someone else, is that still 'me'? He says no, and it's mind-blowing because it challenges our fear of death—if identity is fluid, maybe survival isn't binary.
Then there's his critique of self-interest theory. Parfit dismantles the idea that rationality means always acting in your own best interest. He shows how pure self-interest can lead to paradoxical outcomes, like future selves suffering for past choices. The book's density scared me at first, but now I quote it in random conversations—like when friends stress about legacy, I hit them with Parfit's 'Bundle Theory' and watch their brains short-circuit.
関連する検索
人気質問
無料で面白い小説を探して読んでみましょう
GoodNovel アプリで人気小説に無料で！お好きな本をダウンロードして、いつでもどこでも読みましょう！
アプリで無料で本を読む
コードをスキャンしてアプリで読む
