Why Did 'Robert I Baratheon' Hate The Targaryens So Much?

It's easy to see why Robert Fagles' translation of 'The Iliad' keeps showing up on syllabi — it reads like a living poem without pretending to be ancient English. What I love about his version is how it balances fidelity with momentum: Fagles isn't slavishly literal, but he doesn't drown the text in modern slang either. The lines have a strong, forward drive that makes Homeric speeches feel urgent and human, which matters a lot when you're trying to get a room of people to care about Bronze Age honor systems and camp politics. His diction lands somewhere between poetic and conversational, so you can quote a line in class without losing students five minutes later trying to unpack the grammar. Beyond style, there are practical classroom reasons I've noticed. The Penguin (or other widely available) Fagles edition comes with a solid introduction, maps, and annotations that are concise and useful for discussion rather than overwhelming. That helps newbies to epic poetry jump in without needing a lexicon every other line. Compared to more literal translations like Richmond Lattimore, which are invaluable for close philological work but can feel stiffer, Fagles opens doors: students can experience the story and themes first, then go back to a denser translation for detailed analysis. I've watched this pattern happen repeatedly — readers use Fagles to build an emotional and narrative rapport with characters like Achilles and Hector, and only then do they care enough to slog through more exacting versions. There's also a theater-friendly quality to his lines. A poem that works when read aloud is a huge gift for any instructor trying to stage passages in class or encourage group readings. Fagles' cadence and line breaks support performance and memory, which turns single-page passages into moments students remember. Finally, the edition is simply ubiquitous and affordable; when an edition is easy to find used or fits a budget, it becomes the de facto classroom text. Taken together — clarity, literary voice, supporting materials, performability, and accessibility — it makes perfect sense that educators reach for Fagles' 'The Iliad' when they want to introduce Homer in a way that feels alive rather than academic only. For someone who loves watching words work on a group of listeners, his translation still feels like the right first door into Homeric rage and glory.

Oh man, I love talking about translations — especially when a favorite like 'The Iliad' by Robert Fagles is on the table. From my bedside stack of epic translations, Fagles stands out because he aimed to make Homer slam into modern ears: his lines are punchy and readable. That choice carries over into the notes too. He doesn't bury the book in dense, scholarly footnotes on every line; instead, you get a solid, reader-friendly set of explanatory notes and a helpful introduction that unpack names, mythic background, cultural touches, and tricky references. They’re the kind of notes I flip to when my brain trips over a sudden catalogue of ships or a god’s obscure epithet — concise, clarifying, and aimed at general readers rather than specialists. I should mention format: in most popular editions of Fagles' 'The Iliad' (the Penguin editions most folks buy), the substantive commentary lives in the back or as endnotes rather than as minute line-by-line sidelines. There’s usually a translator’s note, an introduction that situates the poem historically and poetically, and a glossary or list of dramatis personae — all the practical stuff that keeps you from getting lost. If you want textual variants, deep philology, or exhaustive commentary on every linguistic turn, Fagles isn’t the heavyweight toolbox edition. For that level you’d pair him with more technical commentaries or a dual-language Loeb edition that prints the Greek and more erudite notes. How I actually read Fagles: I’ll cruise through the poem enjoying his rhythm, then flip to the notes when something jars — a weird place-name, a ceremony I don’t recognize, or a god doing something offbeat. The notes enhance the experience without making it feel like a textbook. If you’re studying or writing about Homer in depth, layer him with a scholarly commentary or essays from something like the 'Cambridge Companion to Homer' and maybe a Loeb for the Greek. But for immersive reading, Fagles’ notes are just right — they keep the action moving and my curiosity fed without bogging the verse down in footnote weeds.

I still get a thrill when a line from Robert Fagles's 'The Iliad' catches my ear — he has a knack for making Homer feel like he's speaking right across a smoky hearth. The first thing that sells me is the voice: it's elevated without being fusty, muscular without being overwrought. Fagles preserves the epic tone by keeping the grand gestures, the big similes, and those recurring epithets that give the poem its ritual pulse. When heroes stride into battle or gods intervene, the language snaps to attention in a way that reads like performance rather than a museum piece. Technically, of course, you can't transplant dactylic hexameter into English intact, and Fagles never pretends to. What he does is recapture the momentum and oral energy of Homer through varied line length, rhythmic cadences, and a healthy use of repetition and formula. Compared to someone like Richmond Lattimore — who is closer to a literal schema — Fagles trades some word-for-word fidelity for idiomatic force. That means you'll sometimes get a phrase shaped for modern impact, not exact morphemes from the Greek, but the tradeoff is often worth it: the poem breathes. If you're approaching 'The Iliad' for passion or performance, Fagles is a spectacular doorway. For philological nitpicking or line-by-line classroom exegesis, pair him with a more literal translation or the Greek text. Personally, when I want the fury and grandeur to hit fast, I reach for Fagles and read passages aloud — it still feels unapologetically Homeric to me.

Whenever I pick up 'Mastery' in PDF form I feel like I'm holding a tiny research lab: annotations, highlights, footnotes, and the ability to jump back-and-forth make it ideal for study. I read at my own speed, pause to chew on Greene's historical vignettes, and copy-paste quotes into my notes. The visual layout matters—chapter headings, sidebars, and any diagrams are easier to parse when I can see the whole page and get a sense of structure. For dense sections about apprenticeship or practice, being able to reread a paragraph two or three times helps the ideas stick. On the flip side, the audiobook has a different kind of muscle. While jogging or doing chores, I let the narrator carry me through the stories; the cadence and emphasis make certain lessons land emotionally. If the narrator is engaging, the book becomes a series of lived moments rather than just a set of rules. But audiobooks can blur dense, list-like advice—it's harder to go back to a specific sentence. Personally, I like to alternate: listen first to get the narrative momentum, then deep-dive into the PDF to mine concrete techniques and build my own study notes.

Reading 'Mastery' felt like having a long conversation with a stubborn, wise mentor who refuses shortcuts. I got pulled into the idea that mastery is less about flashy genius and more about patient, stubborn apprenticeship. Greene breaks down how you should spend years absorbing the rules of a field — not rushing to impress, but learning craft, techniques, and failure patterns. That apprenticeship phase, where you deliberately practice and get honest feedback, is the core takeaway that keeps echoing for me. Another big thing I took away is the creative shift after apprenticeship: once techniques are internalized you start experimenting, combining disciplines, and developing intuition. He also stresses social intelligence — navigating egos, politics, and mentors — because skill without people skills can stall. Practical bits stuck with me too: hunt for mentors, embrace boredom as a sign of real work, turn setbacks into data, and structure your environment so you minimize distractions. All of it reframed mastery from a distant myth into a methodical, sometimes messy path that I actually feel ready to try again on a new project.

Okay, here’s the short-but-helpful scoop I usually tell friends who ask me this over coffee: Robert Kiyosaki has authored and co-authored more than two dozen books under the 'Rich Dad' brand. Depending on how you count—main titles, special editions, kid/teen spin-offs, workbooks, and co-authored projects—the commonly cited number sits around the mid-to-high twenties, and some catalogs list 30 or more entries when you include every niche item. What makes the exact count fuzzy is that Kiyosaki often collaborates with different co-authors (like Sharon Lechter and others), releases updated editions, and publishes region-specific or audience-specific versions such as 'Rich Dad Poor Dad for Teens' and workbooks tied to the 'Cashflow' board game. If you want a neat checklist, the most reliable places are the publisher’s site or the 'Rich Dad' website, where they list primary titles and new releases. Personally, I still enjoy revisiting 'Rich Dad Poor Dad' and 'Rich Dad's Cashflow Quadrant'—they're the roots of the whole series, even if the full catalog is pleasantly sprawling.

Growing up, I was enthralled by Robert Downey Jr.'s journey in Hollywood. Did you know he started acting at just five years old? Talk about getting a head start! His childhood was filled with artsy family vibes since his dad was a filmmaker, and I can’t help but wonder how that influenced his creative path. Fast forward to the '80s, he was already a young star in movies like 'The Pick-up Artist.' It's astonishing that he was able to dive into such diverse roles at such a young age. What blows my mind even more is his tumultuous relationship with substances. It’s like watching a real-life superhero facing off with his inner demons. He spent time in rehab multiple times, and you’d think that would be the end of his career, but he came back stronger—how? This comeback led to iconic roles like Tony Stark in 'Iron Man', turning him into a global icon. There’s something deeply inspiring about someone rising from the ashes like that and redefining themselves. And here’s a fun nugget: he was nominated for an Oscar for 'Chaplin'. I mean, the range of talent there is simply impressive. It's hard to believe that such a layered actor faced so many challenges behind the scenes, but that’s part of what keeps me rooting for him! His story has it all: struggle, redemption, and a flair for the dramatic. It's a real-life superhero tale!

Robert Downey Jr. has had quite an extraordinary journey, both in his personal life and career. Many fans know him as Iron Man, but few realize that he was actually born into an artistic family; his father was a filmmaker. This early immersion in the arts clearly shaped his future. During the ‘90s, he struggled with substance abuse, even admitting to using drugs on the set of 'Ally McBeal.' This led him to a series of legal troubles, ultimately changing his life around after a long struggle with addiction. It’s truly inspirational to see how he was able to rise from those depths, and he often credits his family, particularly his wife Susan, for being his rock during tough times. Another fascinating tidbit is that RDJ is a bit of a tech geek! He has a keen interest in artificial intelligence and even created his own AI to help his preparation for roles. It’s amazing how he combines his love for innovation with his craft. His unique approach to acting and his willingness to embrace new technology makes him stand out in Hollywood. And who knew he was so savvy behind the scenes?