Why Does Athena Support The Greeks In The Iliad?

It's easy to see why Robert Fagles' translation of 'The Iliad' keeps showing up on syllabi — it reads like a living poem without pretending to be ancient English. What I love about his version is how it balances fidelity with momentum: Fagles isn't slavishly literal, but he doesn't drown the text in modern slang either. The lines have a strong, forward drive that makes Homeric speeches feel urgent and human, which matters a lot when you're trying to get a room of people to care about Bronze Age honor systems and camp politics. His diction lands somewhere between poetic and conversational, so you can quote a line in class without losing students five minutes later trying to unpack the grammar. Beyond style, there are practical classroom reasons I've noticed. The Penguin (or other widely available) Fagles edition comes with a solid introduction, maps, and annotations that are concise and useful for discussion rather than overwhelming. That helps newbies to epic poetry jump in without needing a lexicon every other line. Compared to more literal translations like Richmond Lattimore, which are invaluable for close philological work but can feel stiffer, Fagles opens doors: students can experience the story and themes first, then go back to a denser translation for detailed analysis. I've watched this pattern happen repeatedly — readers use Fagles to build an emotional and narrative rapport with characters like Achilles and Hector, and only then do they care enough to slog through more exacting versions. There's also a theater-friendly quality to his lines. A poem that works when read aloud is a huge gift for any instructor trying to stage passages in class or encourage group readings. Fagles' cadence and line breaks support performance and memory, which turns single-page passages into moments students remember. Finally, the edition is simply ubiquitous and affordable; when an edition is easy to find used or fits a budget, it becomes the de facto classroom text. Taken together — clarity, literary voice, supporting materials, performability, and accessibility — it makes perfect sense that educators reach for Fagles' 'The Iliad' when they want to introduce Homer in a way that feels alive rather than academic only. For someone who loves watching words work on a group of listeners, his translation still feels like the right first door into Homeric rage and glory.

Oh man, I love talking about translations — especially when a favorite like 'The Iliad' by Robert Fagles is on the table. From my bedside stack of epic translations, Fagles stands out because he aimed to make Homer slam into modern ears: his lines are punchy and readable. That choice carries over into the notes too. He doesn't bury the book in dense, scholarly footnotes on every line; instead, you get a solid, reader-friendly set of explanatory notes and a helpful introduction that unpack names, mythic background, cultural touches, and tricky references. They’re the kind of notes I flip to when my brain trips over a sudden catalogue of ships or a god’s obscure epithet — concise, clarifying, and aimed at general readers rather than specialists. I should mention format: in most popular editions of Fagles' 'The Iliad' (the Penguin editions most folks buy), the substantive commentary lives in the back or as endnotes rather than as minute line-by-line sidelines. There’s usually a translator’s note, an introduction that situates the poem historically and poetically, and a glossary or list of dramatis personae — all the practical stuff that keeps you from getting lost. If you want textual variants, deep philology, or exhaustive commentary on every linguistic turn, Fagles isn’t the heavyweight toolbox edition. For that level you’d pair him with more technical commentaries or a dual-language Loeb edition that prints the Greek and more erudite notes. How I actually read Fagles: I’ll cruise through the poem enjoying his rhythm, then flip to the notes when something jars — a weird place-name, a ceremony I don’t recognize, or a god doing something offbeat. The notes enhance the experience without making it feel like a textbook. If you’re studying or writing about Homer in depth, layer him with a scholarly commentary or essays from something like the 'Cambridge Companion to Homer' and maybe a Loeb for the Greek. But for immersive reading, Fagles’ notes are just right — they keep the action moving and my curiosity fed without bogging the verse down in footnote weeds.

I still get a thrill when a line from Robert Fagles's 'The Iliad' catches my ear — he has a knack for making Homer feel like he's speaking right across a smoky hearth. The first thing that sells me is the voice: it's elevated without being fusty, muscular without being overwrought. Fagles preserves the epic tone by keeping the grand gestures, the big similes, and those recurring epithets that give the poem its ritual pulse. When heroes stride into battle or gods intervene, the language snaps to attention in a way that reads like performance rather than a museum piece. Technically, of course, you can't transplant dactylic hexameter into English intact, and Fagles never pretends to. What he does is recapture the momentum and oral energy of Homer through varied line length, rhythmic cadences, and a healthy use of repetition and formula. Compared to someone like Richmond Lattimore — who is closer to a literal schema — Fagles trades some word-for-word fidelity for idiomatic force. That means you'll sometimes get a phrase shaped for modern impact, not exact morphemes from the Greek, but the tradeoff is often worth it: the poem breathes. If you're approaching 'The Iliad' for passion or performance, Fagles is a spectacular doorway. For philological nitpicking or line-by-line classroom exegesis, pair him with a more literal translation or the Greek text. Personally, when I want the fury and grandeur to hit fast, I reach for Fagles and read passages aloud — it still feels unapologetically Homeric to me.

Okay, I get carried away by this question, because the 'Iliad' feels like a living thing to me — stitched together from voices across generations rather than a neat product of one solitary genius. When I read the poem I notice its repetition, stock phrases, and those musical formulas that Milman Parry and Albert Lord described — which screams oral composition. That doesn't rule out a single final poet, though. It's entirely plausible that a gifted rhapsode shaped and polished a long oral tradition into the version we know, adding structure, character emphasis, and memorable lines. Linguistic clues — the mixed dialects, the Ionic backbone, and archaic vocabulary — point to layers of transmission, edits, and regional influences. So was the author definitely Homer? I'm inclined to think 'Homer' is a convenient name for a tradition: maybe one historical bard, maybe a brilliant redactor, maybe a brand-name attached to a body of performance. When I read it, I enjoy the sense that many hands and mouths brought these songs to life, and that ambiguity is part of the poem's magic.

I still get a little thrill every time I read Book 5 of the "Iliad" — Diomedes' aristeia is one of those scenes that feels like a medieval boss fight where the hero gets a temporary superpower. Athena literally grants him the eyesight and courage to perceive and strike immortals who are meddling on the field. That divine backing is crucial: without Athena’s direct aid he wouldn’t even try to attack a god. So why Aphrodite and Ares? Practically, Aphrodite had just swooped in to rescue Aeneas and carry him from the mêlée, and Diomedes, furious and on a roll, wounds her hand — a very concrete, battlefield-motivated act of defense for the Greek lines. He later confronts Ares as well; the narrative frames these strikes as possible because Athena singled him out to punish gods who are actively tipping the scales against the Greeks. Symbolically, the scene dramatizes an important theme: mortals can contest divine interference, especially when a goddess like Athena empowers them. It’s not pure hubris so much as a sanctioned pushback — a reminder that gods in Homer are participants in the war, not untouchable spectators. Reading it now I love how Homer mixes raw combat excitement with questions about agency and honor.

I’ve always loved how the Greeks split the idea of war into two different people — it tells you a lot about how they thought. Athena is this cool, collected force: goddess of wisdom, crafts, and strategic warfare. She didn’t just enjoy fighting; she embodied the intelligent, lawful side of conflict. Born fully armored from Zeus’s head, she’s often shown with an owl, an olive tree, a helmet, and the aegis — symbols of knowledge, civic life, and protection. In stories like the 'Iliad' and the 'Odyssey', she’s the brains behind heroes like Odysseus, nudging them toward clever plans and just outcomes. Her worship was civic and institutionalized — think the Parthenon and the festivals of Athens — a protector of cities, law, and skilled labor like weaving. Ares, by contrast, feels like the raw noise of war. He’s the god of bloodshed, rage, and the heat of battle rather than its planning. His images include dogs and vultures; people tended to fear or avoid him more than revere him. In poems he’s reckless and often humiliated, a figure of brute force rather than honorable strategy. Even Rome’s version, 'Mars', ended up with more nuanced agricultural and civic roles, which shows how differently cultures adapted that raw war-energy. In pop culture, you see this split again: Athena-type characters mentor and strategize, while Ares-types are often antagonists who revel in chaos. Personally, I find Athena more inspiring — I like the idea that wisdom can win a fight without turning into brutality, and that civic values matter even in war.

Walking through a museum courtyard and seeing a marble helmet or an owl statuette always gets me thinking about why artists loved painting and carving Athena the way they did. For one, she was a brilliantly compact symbol: wisdom, strategy, civic order, and righteous violence all bundled into one recognizable figure. Ancient viewers needed quick visual cues, so painters and sculptors leaned on a stable iconography — helmet, spear, shield or aegis often bearing the Gorgoneion, and the owl or olive — to signal ‘‘that’s Athena.’’ That shorthand let artists tell stories at a glance on vases, temple friezes like the Parthenon, and public monuments tied to festivals such as the Panathenaia. Another reason is cultural taste and politics. I like to imagine a vase painter in Athens deliberately emphasizing her calm, helmeted profile because the city wanted to present itself as guided by reason, not brute force. Athena’s mixed portfolio — crafty war rather than chaotic battle, patronage of crafts and law — mirrored civic ideals. Poets like Homer in the 'Iliad' and Hesiod in the 'Theogony' gave artists rich source material, and temple patrons wanted that mix of divine authority and moral example embodied visually. So artists weren’t just pretty-making; they were shaping civic identity. Finally, there’s artistic play: depicting a goddess who’s both serene and fierce let artists explore gesture and costume. Drapery, contrapposto stances, the terrifying Gorgon on the aegis, the small, knowing owl — all of these offered texture and contrast. For me, those contradictions are the most alive part of ancient art: you can see society’s anxieties and aspirations carved in marble and painted in slip, and that keeps me coming back for another look.

There’s something endlessly fun about tracing Athena’s voice through myths — she’s the kind of goddess who shows up with a plan, a polished shield, and a deadpan remark that actually changes history. When I read the 'Odyssey' on a rainy afternoon once, Athena felt alive in every scene where a disguised stranger nudges a hero toward the right decision. She counsels Odysseus repeatedly (sometimes in the form of Mentor), shaping his strategy, encouraging restraint, and jumpstarting Telemachus into manhood. The whole ‘mentor’ idea literally comes from her influence, which always makes me smile when I see the word used in modern storytelling. Athena’s counsel isn’t only private pep talks. In the 'Iliad' she intervenes strategically — advising Diomedes to take bold action and steering battles so that wit, not just brute force, wins the day. Then there’s the courtroom climax in 'Eumenides' where she’s the calm arbiter, founding trial by jury and offering a civic solution to bloodfeuds. It’s fascinating: the same goddess who lends a polished shield to Perseus is also the one who helps create laws and institutions. Her contest with Poseidon for Athens — gifting the olive tree — reads like a mythic brief in favor of civilization and craft over simple dominance. I love how these stories scatter little reminders that wisdom and strategy are as heroic as strength. If you’re into reading myths like a strategist, Athena is the best kind of guide: practical, slightly stern, and disarmingly effective. Next time you watch a clever protagonist win, check for an Athena whisper behind the scenes — I bet you’ll find one.