Is Solomon A Villain In Fate Series?

Solomon's morality in 'Fate' is like trying to solve a puzzle where the pieces keep changing shape. On one hand, he's the guy who basically wrote the playbook on magecraft; on the other, his legacy is hijacked by Goetia to burn human history. But here's the kicker: Solomon *knew* this would happen. His Clairvoyance let him see the future, and he still chose to become a Heroic Spirit, knowing his corpse would be used for evil. That's some next-level tragic foresight.

The 'Fate' series often asks whether ends justify means, and Solomon's arc is a masterclass in that debate. His cold, calculated love for humanity led to both salvation and ruin. And let's not forget Romani Archaman—his human incarnation—who spends years undoing the mess. The way these threads weave together makes Solomon less of a villain and more of a flawed architect. Plus, his voice lines in 'FGO' are hauntingly poetic. 'The time of birth has come. I am the one who governs all'—goosebumps every time.

Debating Solomon's villainy in 'Fate' feels like arguing whether fire is good or bad—it depends how it's used. Goetia is undeniably the antagonist, but Solomon? He's the match that lit the flame, then threw himself into water to put it out. His story is all about consequences. He created the Demon Gods, yeah, but also built the system to defeat them. That's not villainy; that's responsibility taken to the extreme.

What sticks with me is his final scene in 'FGO'. The way he smiles as he vanishes—it's bittersweet. He could've been a god, but chose to be human instead. If that's not heroic, I don't know what is.

Man, Solomon in the 'Fate' series is such a fascinating character to unpack! At first glance, he seems like this wise, almost detached figure—King Solomon, the mage of miracles, right? But then 'Fate/Grand Order' throws a curveball with Goetia, who's basically Solomon's darker side wearing his corpse like a suit. Goetia's the big bad of Part 1, so technically, Solomon's body *is* the vessel for the antagonist. But the real Solomon? Dude sacrificed his own existence to set up humanity's victory. It's wild how the series blurs the line between hero and villain.

What really gets me is how Solomon's story plays with destiny. He's a Servant who literally erased himself from the Throne of Heroes to stop Goetia's plan. That's not something a true villain would do. But then again, his actions created Goetia in the first place—his cold, logical approach to humanity's suffering birthed a monster. The 'Fate' series loves these moral gray areas, and Solomon's legacy is one of its best examples. In the end, I'd say he's more of a tragic figure than a straight-up villain.

Solomon's role in 'Fate' is peak storytelling ambiguity. Goetia—the Beast I—uses Solomon's name and form, but they're fundamentally different entities. Solomon himself is a Heroic Spirit who made the ultimate sacrifice, while Goetia is the accumulation of his demons (literally). The irony? Solomon's wish for humanity's survival is what *allowed* Goetia to exist. That duality is what makes him so compelling—he's both the cause and solution to the problem.

I love how 'Fate/Grand Order' frames him. His final act, relinquishing his powers and name, feels like redemption. But calling him a villain oversimplifies it. He's more like a catalyst for the conflict, a mirror to humanity's flaws. The way his story intertwines with themes of free will vs. predestination is just *chef's kiss*. Also, his design? Majestic as heck. That robe with the floating rings lives rent-free in my head.