3 คำตอบ2025-02-10 10:42:01
Nagini ended up with Voldemort because they both shared an uncommon trait - they were both living Horcruxes, created by Voldemort himself using dark magic. He used Nagini to perform many of his dark deeds and she was loyal because of the soul fragment within her. Ultimately, Nagini was more than just a pet to Voldemort, she was a vessel for a piece of his soul.
3 คำตอบ2025-08-01 20:09:56
Nagini is one of the most fascinating characters in the 'Harry Potter' series, and I’ve always been intrigued by her backstory. She’s not just any ordinary snake; she’s a Maledictus, a person cursed to transform permanently into a beast—in her case, a giant serpent. Originally a human woman with the ability to shapeshift, Nagini’s tragic fate binds her to Lord Voldemort, becoming his loyal Horcrux and companion. The way J.K. Rowling revealed her human past in 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' added so much depth to her character. It’s heartbreaking to think about her losing her humanity over time, especially when you see her in 'Fantastic Beasts' as a circus performer struggling with her curse. Her duality as both victim and villain makes her one of the most complex figures in the Wizarding World.
1 คำตอบ2024-12-04 00:14:52
Voldemort from 'Harry Potter' lacks a nose because, by creating Horcruxes for immortality, he lost his human form and started looking serpent-like which symbolizes his evil nature
2 คำตอบ2025-02-01 16:34:01
Well, this part of the Potterverse gets really deep. Voldemort's killing of Snape was a matter of convoluted intricacies, rooted in his beliefs about the Elder Wand's allegiance. Voldemort believed in the 'wand ownership transfer through murder' theory. He was convinced that Snape, who had killed Albus Dumbledore, was the master of the Elder Wand.
Consequently, he believed that to become the rightful owner and unlock the full power of the Elder Wand, he needed to kill Snape. Now here's where it gets darkly ironic. Voldemort, an epitome of cunning and power, was misled by his own theories. The Elder Wand's allegiance had already shifted to Harry, not through murder, but disarmament. Draco Malfoy, not Snape, was the one who'd disarmed Dumbledore prior to his death. Harry later disarmed Draco, making him unbeknownst the wand's genuine master.
Yet, Voldemort's misinterpretation led to Snape's tragic end. Snape dies, in the end, revealing another truth to Harry through his memories—a truth about his undying love for Lily Potter. Snape's death, thus, turned out to be one of the most heartbreaking moments in the books. Through his death, a misunderstood character transformed into a tragic anti-hero, etching a permanent place in readers' hearts.
2 คำตอบ2025-02-20 10:51:57
Ah, the tale of Tom Riddle and his transformation into Voldemort has always been a chilling one. Born to a witch mother, Merope Gaunt, and a Muggle father, Tom Riddle was always unusual. His tragic upbringing in an orphanage didn't stop him from being exceptionally gifted in the magical arts. Climbing up the ranks while at Hogwarts, he was charming and cunning.
Dumbledore, the then Transfiguration teacher, could always sense something off about him, though. His obsession with immortality, superiority and his resentment towards his muggle father led him down a dark path. He changed his name to 'Lord Voldemort', as a symbol of his complete detachment from his muggle heritage. It's a dark transformation, but a fascinating character study.
2 คำตอบ2024-12-31 11:12:11
Ah, the dreaded 'He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named', otherwise known as Voldemort from the 'Harry Potter' series. J.K. Rowling portrays Voldemort as a character with an unnaturally contorted visage, his serpentine features lacking what would normally be present in the area above the mouth. This was not how he had always appeared. Young Tom Riddle, before becoming Lord Voldemort, was said to carry a more comely countenance. His physical transformation into the monstrous form we know as Voldemort resulted from his exploration of treacherous arcane arts in pursuit of immortality. In fracturing his soul through the production of Horcruxes, an act dividing one's essence to attain everlasting life though at tremendous cost, with each fragmentation his human semblance further unraveled. Hence emerged his lack of a nasal protrusion lending him a snakelike mien symbolic of his kinship with serpents and the accoutrement of Parseltongue. Additionally, this inhuman visage aptly illustrates his cruelty and the horrifying effects of his departure from natural existence into something wholly unnatural. Voldemort's deficiency of a nose not only underscores his inhumanity but also reinforces Rowling's narrative, emphasizing the dread and monstrosity associated with him. This, in my view, represents a powerful literary device whereby outward form reflects inward nature.
5 คำตอบ2025-01-17 21:52:59
The ability to enjoy both infallibility and invulnerability required that there should be no hazards whatever. So he desperately yearned to hear the full chance, in case his own guess was wrong-and that Harry Potter represented a Chosen
One destined to confront him. It is all about control, is it not? Understanding the prophecy would be one way for Voldemort—who liked nothing better than to have complete control over everything imaginable—to exert some control over its outworking.
3 คำตอบ2025-09-11 22:24:07
Magic battles aren't just about raw power—it's about ideology, tactics, and the weight of history. Voldemort's strength lies in his obsession with immortality and pure-blood supremacy, which made him terrifyingly single-minded. He created Horcruxes, something even Grindelwald never attempted, showing a willingness to fracture his soul for power. But Grindelwald? He wasn't just a dark wizard; he was a revolutionary. His charisma united wizards across Europe, and his visions of wizard dominance were almost political. The duel between Dumbledore and Grindelwald in 'Fantastic Beasts' was legendary, while Voldemort's fights often relied on fear rather than skill.
Personally, I think Grindelwald's broader influence and strategic mind would outmaneuver Voldemort's brute-force approach. Voldemort might have more 'dark magic accolades,' but Grindelwald understood people—something Voldemort never grasped. It's like comparing a dictator to a cult leader; both are dangerous, but one leaves a deeper ideological mark. The way Grindelwald wielded the Elder Wand also hints at a mastery Voldemort never achieved, despite his obsession with it.