I'll be honest, most of the popular 'spicy' lists feel incredibly cyclical right now, and it's starting to wear a bit thin. The algorithm keeps pushing the same ten to fifteen books with different, increasingly dramatic thumbnails. You've got your obligatory Ali Hazelwood STEM romance recs, which I enjoy well enough, but 'Love, Theoretically' feels like it's on every single list. Then there's the dark academia-ish mafia adjacent stuff, like 'Does It Hurt?' by H.D. Carlton, which seems permanently lodged in the rotation. The real glut, though, is in monster romance. Last year it felt fresh with 'A Lady of Rooksgrave Manor', but now my entire feed is just variations of 'orcs but they're hot' and 'vampires but they're morally grey and horny'. It's not that these are bad, it's just that the lists feel less like personal recommendations and more like an echo chamber chasing the last viral hit. I've found better, more specific spice by looking at niche trope tags instead of broad 'spicy' lists—searching for 'villain romance' or 'marriage of convenience with spice' has led me to way more interesting finds than the generic top ten videos.
That said, there is one title I see constantly that actually lives up to the hype for me, and that's 'Powerless' by Elsie Silver. It's a hockey romance, which is its own saturated sub-genre, but the dynamic between the two leads has a tension that a lot of other books on these lists lack. The spice feels earned, not just inserted because the genre demands it. But I'm also noticing a shift towards what people are calling 'warm spice' or 'emotional spice'—books where the physical moments are intense but deeply intertwined with character development. 'Yours Truly' by Abby Jimenez gets mentioned for this, though it's less explicit than the typical BookTok fare. The lists are beginning, slowly, to reflect that some readers want the heat to come from a place of connection, not just anatomical description.