I think it depends entirely on which 'surviving the game' book you're talking about, as there are quite a few with that premise. If we're focusing on a popular one like 'The Hunger Games', the core survival strategy isn't just physical strength or combat skills, though those are important. It's about manipulating public perception. Katniss's most crucial move in the first book is the 'star-crossed lovers' act with Peeta. That narrative, broadcast to the entire nation, turns them from tributes into symbols, giving the Capitol a reason to keep them alive beyond the arena's rules. It shifts the game from a pure battle royale into a political performance where survival hinges on winning the audience's favor as much as defeating opponents.
Beyond that, a more universal strategy across these types of stories is alliance-building, but with a sharp edge of constant evaluation. You form temporary partnerships for mutual benefit—sharing resources, watching each other's backs—but you always know the alliance has an expiration date, because in the end, only one person or team can win. The smartest characters know when to hold on and, more critically, when to break away or even turn on their allies before they get turned on. It's a brutal calculus of trust versus tactical advantage.
Resource management is another huge pillar. This means not just finding water and food, but also scavenging weapons from the environment, understanding the arena's geography to control engagement zones, and sometimes, just mastering the art of hiding and patience. Avoiding conflict altogether can be a more effective long-term strategy than seeking it out, preserving energy and keeping your profile low until the final stages. The strategy is never just one thing; it's a layered approach where social manipulation, tactical alliances, and raw survival instinct constantly intersect, and the moment you forget one layer is usually the moment you're eliminated.