Honestly, I’ve never bought into the idea of a single ‘best novel ever’—it’s like asking for the best painting or song. The whole concept feels like a marketing stunt or a way for critics to argue in circles. Sure, everyone throws around 'War and Peace' or 'Ulysses,' and yeah, those are technical marvels, but are they actually the most read? Are they changing lives in 2024? I know more people who’ve had their worldview shattered by something like 'The Handmaid’s Tale' or even 'The Hunger Games' than by 'Moby-Dick.' The global ‘best’ should maybe be the book that keeps finding new relevance, that gets translated and debated endlessly across cultures, not just the one with the most footnotes in academic papers.
My two cents is that longevity isn’t enough. A book needs this weird alchemy of a story that sticks in your gut, prose that doesn’t feel dated even when it is, and characters who become a kind of shared cultural shorthand. And even then, it’s completely subjective. My ‘best’ is probably Haruki Murakami’s 'Norwegian Wood' for how it captures a specific loneliness, but I’d never claim that’s a global truth. The lists are fun to argue over, but they tell you more about who’s making the list than about the books themselves.