Ha, this one always gets debated. Having read the manga all the way through after the anime ended, yeah, there's definitely material left uncovered. The anime wrapped up with the 'Inarizaki High' match, right? That's not the end of the road. The manga continues into the Spring Tournament's final rounds, so we're talking about the 'Nekoma' match we've all been waiting for—that whole 'Dumpster Battle' thing—and the subsequent matches, which honestly escalate the intensity even further. The character arcs get more resolution too, especially for some of the third-years. But to call it a 'different plot'? Not really. It's the same linear continuation. The real shift some folks talk about is a tonal one in the final arcs post-tournament, focusing more on legacy, passing the torch, and a glimpse into the future. Some readers felt it was rushed, others found it poignant. I personally liked seeing where everyone ended up, even if the pacing felt a bit like a fastball down the line.
What's more interesting to me is how the anime adaptation handled the art. The manga's later art gets incredibly dynamic, with double-page spreads that are just insane. The sheer impact of the final plays loses a bit in the translation to animation sometimes, I think. So while the plot points are an extension, the experience of reading versus watching those points is where the bigger difference lies for me. I remember finishing the final volume and just sitting there, thinking about how far the art had come since those early, scrappy chapters.